• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

姑息治疗住院患者无论预后、身体状况或社会经济地位如何,均倾向于参与研究:多中心队列研究。

Palliative care inpatients favour research participation irrespective of prognosis, performance or socioeconomic status: multicentre cohort study.

作者信息

Dewhurst Felicity, Wakefield Donna, Elverson Joanna, McConnell Robert, Bryan Charlotte, Spriggs Helena, Atkinson Kate, Frew Katherine

机构信息

Population Health Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

St Oswald's Hospice, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Dec 15. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2022-004037.

DOI:10.1136/spcare-2022-004037
PMID:36522142
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Palliative care needs to embrace research to guide service development and effective symptom management. Healthcare professionals often feel research is too burdensome for patients who have poor performance status or are near the end of life. Many studies exclude these groups from participating.We aimed to identify whether specialist palliative care inpatients would wish to take part in research and whether preference varies according to study design, demographics, diagnosis, performance status and prognosis.

METHODS

100 inpatients in two National Health Service specialist palliative care units and one independent hospice in the Northeast of England completed a short questionnaire about preferences for involvement in research.

RESULTS

92% of participants stated they were interested in being involved in research. This was mostly unaffected by age, diagnosis, prognosis, performance and socioeconomic status. Three-quarters were within the last 3 months of life. Simple questions or interviews were the preferred methodology, whereas only half of patients would want further investigations or additional medications and fewer still wanted to participate in online activities, lifestyle change or group activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Palliative care inpatients welcome the opportunity to be involved in research and should not be excluded on the grounds of advanced disease, poor prognosis and low performance status.

摘要

目标

姑息治疗需要开展研究以指导服务发展和有效的症状管理。医疗保健专业人员常常认为,对于身体状况较差或濒临生命终点的患者而言,研究负担过重。许多研究将这些群体排除在参与范围之外。我们旨在确定姑息治疗专科住院患者是否愿意参与研究,以及其意愿是否因研究设计、人口统计学特征、诊断、身体状况和预后而有所不同。

方法

英格兰东北部两个国民保健服务专科姑息治疗病房和一家独立临终关怀医院的100名住院患者完成了一份关于参与研究意愿的简短问卷。

结果

92%的参与者表示有兴趣参与研究。这大多不受年龄、诊断、预后、身体状况和社会经济地位的影响。四分之三的患者处于生命的最后3个月内。简单的问题或访谈是首选方法,而只有一半的患者愿意接受进一步检查或额外用药,更少的患者愿意参与在线活动、生活方式改变或团体活动。

结论

姑息治疗住院患者欢迎参与研究的机会,不应因疾病晚期、预后不良和身体状况差而被排除在外。

相似文献

1
Palliative care inpatients favour research participation irrespective of prognosis, performance or socioeconomic status: multicentre cohort study.姑息治疗住院患者无论预后、身体状况或社会经济地位如何,均倾向于参与研究:多中心队列研究。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Dec 15. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2022-004037.
2
Eye donation from palliative and hospice care contexts: the EDiPPPP mixed-methods study.从姑息治疗和临终关怀环境中进行眼捐献:EDiPPPP 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Nov;11(20):1-159. doi: 10.3310/KJWA6741.
3
The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.AMBER 关怀包用于生命末期临近、康复情况不确定的住院患者:改善关怀可行性群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(55):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23550.
4
5
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
6
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hospital-based specialist palliative care for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers.针对患有晚期疾病的成年人及其护理人员的医院专科姑息治疗的有效性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 30;9(9):CD012780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012780.pub2.
7
Social and clinical determinants of preferences and their achievement at the end of life: prospective cohort study of older adults receiving palliative care in three countries.社会和临床决定因素对生命终末期偏好及其实现的影响:对三个国家接受姑息治疗的老年患者的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0648-4.
8
Right needle, right patient, right time? A national flash-mob audit of thromboprophylaxis in palliative care.右针,右病人,右时机?姑息治疗中血栓预防的全国快闪审计。
Thromb Res. 2023 Mar;223:95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2023.01.021. Epub 2023 Jan 26.
9
Preferred place of death for patients referred to a specialist palliative care service.转诊至专科姑息治疗服务机构的患者的首选死亡地点。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015 Sep;5(3):294-6. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000338. Epub 2013 May 27.
10
Preferences regarding disclosure of prognosis and end-of-life care: A survey of cancer patients with advanced disease in a lower-middle-income country.关于预后和临终关怀信息披露的偏好:对一个中低收入国家晚期癌症患者的调查。
Palliat Med. 2016 Jul;30(7):661-73. doi: 10.1177/0269216315625810. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Providing life-sustaining treatments at home for those with Motor Neurone Disease: A qualitative study of bereaved family members' experiences of responsibility.为运动神经元病患者在家提供维持生命的治疗:一项关于失去亲人的家庭成员责任体验的定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2025 May;39(5):584-593. doi: 10.1177/02692163251327866. Epub 2025 Mar 22.