Department of Oral Medicine, Glasgow Dental Hospital and School, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
Evid Based Dent. 2022 Dec;23(4):142-143. doi: 10.1038/s41432-022-0843-9. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
Design This study is a double-blind, single-centre, split-mouth, prospective randomised control trial. In total, 48 patients had bilateral third molars removed during two separate operations at least 21 days apart by the same maxillofacial surgeon. During the control operation, the tooth was irrigated with saline at 25°C. During the test operation, patients were randomised to tooth irrigation with saline at either 10°C (n = 24) or 4°C (n = 24). Local anaesthetic, flap design, burr design and sutures remained consistent throughout. Patients were prescribed amoxicillin, chlorhexidine and were advised to take paracetamol as needed. The patients remained blinded to which test group they were randomised to and to the order of the control or test operations performed. Participants self-recorded analgesia use and post-operative pain daily for seven days using a visual analogue scale (VAS). A second maxillofacial surgeon examined patients on days one, three and seven. Facial swelling was assessed by measuring the distance between various soft tissue points compared to pre-operative levels. Trismus was determined by measuring maximum inter-incisal opening compared to pre-operative levels.Case selection In total, 28 female and 20 male medically fit adult patients with a mean age of 24.6 ± 3.8 with bilateral mandibular asymptomatic third molar teeth were selected. Second molars with periodontal probing depths >4 mm or impacted third molars associated with cysts or tumours were excluded. Patients had no antibiotic prescription in the preceding month nor analgesic consumption in the 12 hours before surgery.Data analysis The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to evaluate if the sample fit a normal distribution. Relationships between the categorical variables of the groups was tested using chi-square statistics. Data comparisons were examined with the Duncan, Kriskal-Wallis, Dunn and Friedman test (p <0.05).Results The median duration of the control and test group operations were similar (p = 0.051). Test group patients reported lower pain VAS values and consumed less analgesics compared to the control groups (p = 0.001), with the lowest values seen in the 4°C group (p <0.001). A greater decrease in trismus levels was also seen on day three and seven in the test groups (p <0.001) compared to the control group (p = 0.07). Swelling was greatest in the control group (p <0.001) and reduced on day seven (p <0.001) in all groups. While trismus and swelling values were lower in the 10°C test group compared to the control (p <0.001), the lowest values of these parameters at all time points was in the 4°C group (p <0.001).Conclusions Early complications following third molar removal include facial swelling, trismus and pain. In this study, intraoperative cooled saline irrigation to 4°C and 10°C was more effective than saline irrigation at 25°C in reducing the intensity of these conditions.
设计 本研究为一项双盲、单中心、劈裂口腔、前瞻性随机对照试验。总共有 48 名患者由同一位颌面外科医生在两次不同的手术中分开拔除双侧第三磨牙,两次手术至少相隔 21 天。在对照手术中,用 25°C 的生理盐水冲洗牙齿。在试验手术中,患者随机分为用 10°C(n=24)或 4°C(n=24)的生理盐水冲洗牙齿。局部麻醉、皮瓣设计、钻头设计和缝线在整个过程中保持一致。患者均给予阿莫西林、洗必泰,并被建议按需服用扑热息痛。患者对他们被随机分配到哪个试验组以及进行对照或试验手术的顺序均保持盲态。参与者使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)每天自我记录七天的镇痛药物使用情况和术后疼痛。由第二位颌面外科医生在第 1、3 和 7 天检查患者。通过测量与术前水平相比不同软组织点之间的距离来评估面部肿胀。通过测量与术前水平相比最大切牙开口距离来确定牙关紧闭程度。病例选择 共选择了 28 名女性和 20 名年龄在 24.6±3.8 岁之间、双侧下颌无症状第三磨牙的医学适宜成年患者。排除牙周探诊深度>4 毫米或伴有囊肿或肿瘤的阻生第三磨牙的第二磨牙。患者在术前一个月内没有抗生素处方,术前 12 小时内没有使用镇痛药。数据分析 使用 Shapiro-Wilk 检验评估样本是否符合正态分布。使用卡方检验检验组间分类变量之间的关系。使用邓肯、克雷斯瓦尔-沃利斯、邓恩和弗里德曼检验(p<0.05)检查数据比较。结果 对照组和试验组手术的中位持续时间相似(p=0.051)。与对照组相比,试验组患者的 VAS 疼痛评分较低,镇痛药用量较少(p=0.001),4°C 组的评分最低(p<0.001)。在第 3 天和第 7 天,试验组的牙关紧闭程度也较对照组明显下降(p<0.001)(p=0.07)。与所有组相比,对照组的肿胀程度最大(p<0.001),但所有组在第 7 天肿胀均减轻(p<0.001)。与对照组相比,10°C 试验组的磨牙和肿胀值较低(p<0.001),但在所有时间点,这些参数的最低值均在 4°C 组(p<0.001)。结论 第三磨牙拔除后的早期并发症包括面部肿胀、牙关紧闭和疼痛。在这项研究中,与 25°C 的生理盐水冲洗相比,4°C 和 10°C 的术中冷却生理盐水冲洗在减轻这些症状的强度方面更有效。