Bhamber Tiagpaul, Sarwar Zereen, Jones Yekaterina, Albers Brittany K, Shah Chetan
Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, USA.
Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, USA.
Cureus. 2022 Nov 15;14(11):e31531. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31531. eCollection 2022 Nov.
Background and purpose Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) have been administered clinically since 1988. They are remarkably well tolerated by children and result in dose-dependent tissue deposition, even in patients with normal renal function. No adverse effects of gadolinium deposition in patients with normal renal function have been established. Given the uncertain effects of gadolinium deposition, we sought to analyze gadolinium use in the imaging follow-up of nonenhancing primary brain neoplasms in children. Materials and methods This retrospective, institutional review board-approved and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study evaluated pediatric patients who received GBCA in the routine evaluation of brain neoplasms. This special subset included 30 patients (<18 years old) with initially nonenhancing primary intracranial neoplasms who received treatment and follow-up at our institution. Patient data included sex, age from diagnosis to most recent imaging follow-up, number of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow-up exams, and histopathology from a biopsy or resection. Results The group had an expected variety of tumors, including low-grade astrocytomas, dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors, oligodendrogliomas, and teratomas. Half of our patients had tumors of unknown histopathology that were not biopsied or resected. The median age at diagnosis was 8.9 years, the median of four follow-up MRIs per patient, and the median follow-up time of four years. Only one of the 30 patients developed an enhancing focus on follow-up MRI that remained stable and asymptomatic over two years and did not require surgical intervention. Conclusion Judicious use of GBCA in children, especially when numerous exams over many years are anticipated, is advised given the data regarding soft-tissue deposition. Preliminary results suggest that it may be feasible to omit GBCA from routine follow-ups of initially nonenhancing brain neoplasms.
背景与目的 钆基造影剂(GBCAs)自1988年起应用于临床。儿童对其耐受性良好,即使在肾功能正常的患者中也会导致剂量依赖性的组织沉积。肾功能正常的患者中尚未证实钆沉积有不良反应。鉴于钆沉积的影响尚不确定,我们试图分析钆在儿童非强化原发性脑肿瘤成像随访中的使用情况。材料与方法 这项经机构审查委员会批准且符合《健康保险流通与责任法案》的回顾性研究评估了在脑肿瘤常规评估中接受GBCA的儿科患者。这个特殊子集包括30例(<18岁)最初患有非强化原发性颅内肿瘤并在我们机构接受治疗和随访的患者。患者数据包括性别、从诊断到最近一次成像随访的年龄、对比增强磁共振成像(MRI)随访检查的次数以及活检或切除的组织病理学结果。结果 该组患者有多种预期的肿瘤类型,包括低级别星形细胞瘤、胚胎发育不良性神经上皮肿瘤、少突胶质细胞瘤和畸胎瘤。我们一半的患者患有组织病理学不明的肿瘤,未进行活检或切除。诊断时的中位年龄为8.9岁,每位患者的中位随访MRI次数为4次,中位随访时间为4年。30例患者中只有1例在随访MRI上出现强化灶,该强化灶在两年内保持稳定且无症状,无需手术干预。结论 鉴于有关软组织沉积的数据,建议在儿童中谨慎使用GBCA,尤其是在预计多年进行多次检查的情况下。初步结果表明,在最初非强化脑肿瘤的常规随访中省略GBCA可能是可行