Suppr超能文献

直播中用户转向购买昂贵虚拟礼物的影响因素:来自中国的实证证据。

Influencing factors of users' shift to buying expensive virtual gifts in live streaming: Empirical evidence from China.

作者信息

Cao Junwei, Zhang Guihua, Liu Dong, Shang Meng

机构信息

Department of Business, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.

Department of Business, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 30;13:997651. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997651. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

The market size of live streaming on the Internet, in which the streamer earns profit by prompting users to give virtual gifts through emotional labor, is getting bigger and bigger. However, most users will only buy cheap virtual gifts in live streaming, therefore exploring how to promote users to buy expensive virtual gifts is a valuable topic in live commerce research. Based on social presence theory and information overload theory, this study used the PLS-SEM method to investigate the factors influencing live streaming users to shift from buying cheap virtual gifts to buying expensive virtual gifts, and analyzed the moderating role of information overload in these relationships. The results show that immediate interaction anxiety, verbal intimacy, and virtual physical intimacy positively influence users' shift to purchasing expensive virtual gifts, and that perceived network size and perceived financial risk are negative factors in users' shift to purchasing expensive virtual gifts. Information overload has a moderating role in the relationship between immediate interaction anxiety and switch intention, and it also plays a moderating role in the relationship between perceived network size and perceived financial risk on users' switch intention.

摘要

互联网直播市场规模越来越大,在直播中主播通过情感劳动促使用户赠送虚拟礼物来赚取利润。然而,大多数用户在直播中只会购买便宜的虚拟礼物,因此探索如何促进用户购买昂贵的虚拟礼物是直播电商研究中的一个有价值的课题。基于社会临场感理论和信息过载理论,本研究采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)方法,调查影响直播用户从购买便宜虚拟礼物转向购买昂贵虚拟礼物的因素,并分析信息过载在这些关系中的调节作用。结果表明,即时互动焦虑、言语亲密感和虚拟身体亲密感对用户转向购买昂贵虚拟礼物有正向影响,而感知网络规模和感知财务风险是用户转向购买昂贵虚拟礼物的负向因素。信息过载在即时互动焦虑与转换意愿的关系中起调节作用,在感知网络规模和感知财务风险对用户转换意愿的关系中也起调节作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/186c/9748564/5507b7844959/fpsyg-13-997651-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Influencing factors of users' shift to buying expensive virtual gifts in live streaming: Empirical evidence from China.
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 30;13:997651. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.997651. eCollection 2022.
2
Examining the influence of information overload on consumers' purchase in live streaming: A heuristic-systematic model perspective.
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 4;18(8):e0284466. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284466. eCollection 2023.
3
Consumers purchase intention in live-streaming e-commerce: A consumption value perspective and the role of streamer popularity.
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 15;19(2):e0296339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296339. eCollection 2024.
4
Influence of Streamer's Social Capital on Purchase Intention in Live Streaming E-Commerce.
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 24;12:748172. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.748172. eCollection 2021.
5
What Drives Consumer Purchasing Intention in Live Streaming E-Commerce?
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 27;13:938726. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.938726. eCollection 2022.
7
Why are Indonesian consumers buying on live streaming platforms? Research on consumer perceived value theory.
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 24;10(13):e33518. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33518. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
8
Exploring the mechanism of live streaming e-commerce anchors' language appeals on users' purchase intention.
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 9;14:1109092. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1109092. eCollection 2023.
10
Investigating switching intention of e-commerce live streaming users.
Heliyon. 2022 Oct 18;8(10):e11145. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11145. eCollection 2022 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the impact of user perception and gamification elements on repurchase decisions in game live broadcasting.
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 22;16:1492832. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1492832. eCollection 2025.
2
Does having more power make people more materialistic? The role of personal sense of power for gift preferences.
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 25;14:1235527. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1235527. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the impact of information sources on COVID-19 related preventive measures in Finland.
Technol Soc. 2021 May;65:101573. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101573. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
2
Toward street vending in post COVID-19 China: Social networking services information overload and switching intention.
Technol Soc. 2021 Aug;66:101669. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101669. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
4
Chinese affective platform economies: dating, live streaming, and performative labor on Blued.
Media Cult Soc. 2020 May;42(4):502-520. doi: 10.1177/0163443719867283. Epub 2019 Aug 18.
5
Does information overload prevent chronic patients from reading self-management educational materials?
Int J Med Inform. 2016 May;89:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.01.012. Epub 2016 Feb 6.
6
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
7
EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION.
Sociometry. 1965 Sep;28:289-304.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验