Goymann Wolfgang, Brumm Henrik, Kappeler Peter M
Department of Behavioural Neurobiology, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.
Research Group Animal Communication and Urban Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.
Bioessays. 2023 Feb;45(2):e2200173. doi: 10.1002/bies.202200173. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
Biomedical and social scientists are increasingly calling the biological sex into question, arguing that sex is a graded spectrum rather than a binary trait. Leading science journals have been adopting this relativist view, thereby opposing fundamental biological facts. While we fully endorse efforts to create a more inclusive environment for gender-diverse people, this does not require denying biological sex. On the contrary, the rejection of biological sex seems to be based on a lack of knowledge about evolution and it champions species chauvinism, inasmuch as it imposes human identity notions on millions of other species. We argue that the biological definition of the sexes remains central to recognising the diversity of life. Humans with their unique combination of biological sex and gender are different from non-human animals and plants in this respect. Denying the concept of biological sex, for whatever cause, ultimately erodes scientific progress and may open the flood gates to "alternative truths."
生物医学和社会科学家越来越质疑生理性别,认为性别是一个渐变的光谱,而不是二元特征。顶尖科学期刊一直秉持这种相对主义观点,从而与基本的生物学事实背道而驰。虽然我们完全支持为性别多样化的人群创造更包容环境的努力,但这并不需要否认生理性别。相反,对生理性别的否定似乎源于对进化缺乏了解,并且它宣扬物种沙文主义,因为它将人类身份观念强加于数百万其他物种。我们认为,性别的生物学定义对于认识生命的多样性仍然至关重要。在这方面,具有独特生理性别和社会性别组合的人类与非人类动植物有所不同。无论出于何种原因否定生理性别概念,最终都会侵蚀科学进步,并可能打开“另类真相”的闸门。