Suppr超能文献

你是认真的吗?定义两种性别……禁止一种性别并抹去其他性别的政策之荒谬!

Are You Serious? The Absurdity of Policies Defining Two Sexes … Banning One and Erasing Others!

作者信息

Phillips J Craig, Laroussi Hatem, Williams Julie E

机构信息

J. Craig Phillips, LLM, PhD, RN, ACRN, FAAN, FCAN, is full professor, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Hatem Laroussi, MSN, RN, is a PhD candidate, Faculty of Nursing Science, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada, and scholar, VITAM-Centre de recherche en Santé Durable, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2025 Jun 10;36(4):327-334. doi: 10.1097/JNC.0000000000000570.

Abstract

Recent policies-executive actions, judgments, and legislation-that define sex as female and male are rooted in colonial and puritanical interpretations of sex. These policies reinforce cis-heteronormativity and reify hegemonic male dominance in society. Proponents of these policies claim they are based on the definition of biological sex, which would suggest sex is based solely on the presence of gametes, eggs, and sperm. This ignores the natural variations that occur through multiple aspects of sex development that converge to constitute an organism's sex and denies the social aspects of gender and sexuality in humans. Policies based on misinterpretation of biological variability are exclusionary and violate people's civil and human rights, rendering us all less human. We propose recommendations that use inclusive theoretical underpinnings from Black feminism and queer theory and a framework of legal determinants of justice to create policies grounded in human rights principles of dignity and respect.

摘要

最近将性别定义为女性和男性的政策——行政行动、判决和立法——植根于对性别的殖民和清教徒式解读。这些政策强化了顺性别异性恋规范,并使社会中霸权男性的主导地位具体化。这些政策的支持者声称它们基于生物性别的定义,这意味着性别仅基于配子、卵子和精子的存在。这忽略了性发育多个方面出现的自然变异,这些变异共同构成了一个生物体的性别,并否认了人类性别和性取向的社会层面。基于对生物变异性的错误解读的政策具有排他性,侵犯了人们的公民权利和人权,使我们所有人都变得不那么有人性。我们提出建议,利用来自黑人女性主义和酷儿理论的包容性理论基础以及正义的法律决定因素框架,来制定基于尊严和尊重的人权原则的政策。

相似文献

3
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Decolonizing HIV Nursing for Health Equity: Challenges, Strategies, and Paths Forward.
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2025 Mar 13;36(4):337-345. doi: 10.1097/JNC.0000000000000536.
4
The legal determinants of health (in)justice.健康(不)公正的法律决定因素。
Med Law Rev. 2022 Dec 8;30(4):705-723. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwac050.
5
IRP commission: sexual minorities and mental health: global perspectives.IRP 委员会:性少数群体与心理健康:全球视角。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2022 May-Jun;34(3-4):171-199. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2022.2045912. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
6
Let's talk about (biological) sex.让我们来谈谈(生物)性别。
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022 Apr;23(4):227-228. doi: 10.1038/s41580-022-00467-w.
8
The misuses of "biological sex".“生理性别”的滥用
Lancet. 2019 Nov 23;394(10212):1898-1899. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32764-3. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
9
First Report of Concurrent Germ Cell and Epithelial Tumors in Ovotestes of a 46,XY Female Patient.
J Oncol Pract. 2019 Jul;15(7):410-412. doi: 10.1200/JOP.18.00778. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
10

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验