Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida Colleges of Public Health & Health Professions and Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Subst Use Misuse. 2023;58(2):163-170. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2135967. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
Opioid-related overdose deaths recently accelerated. In response, overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) has been implemented widely, though access remains sparse in rural Appalachia. Despite increasing OEND, risk factors for non-evidence-based overdose responses among the training-naïve remain unknown. We enrolled 169 adults who use prescription opioids non-medically and reside in rural West Virginia (August 2014-March 2015). Participants were interviewed about witnessing overdose (lifetime and prior-year), characteristics of the most recent overdose, responses to the overdose, and OEND acceptability. Logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with non-evidence-based responses to overdose. Among the 73 participants who witnessed an opioid-related overdose, the majority (n = 53, 73%) reported any non-evidence-based responses. Participants were significantly more likely to report a non-evidence-based response when victims were unresponsive (OR = 3.36; 95% CI = 1.07, 10.58). Common evidence-based responses included staying with the victim until help arrived (n = 66, 90%) and calling 911 (n = 63, 86%), while the most common non-evidence-based responses were hitting or slapping the victim (n = 37, 51%) and rubbing the victim with ice or placing them in a cold shower or bath (n = 14, 19%). While most (n = 60, 82%) had never heard of OEND, the majority (n = 69, 95%) were willing to train, particularly those reporting non-evidence-based responses (n = 52, 98%). These findings underscore the need to expand access to OEND in rural communities and indicate OEND is acceptable to training-naïve individuals who use opioids in rural Appalachia. Given the "harm reduction deserts" in the region, approaches to expand OEND should be pursued.
阿片类药物相关的过量死亡最近加速了。作为回应,过量用药教育和纳洛酮分发(OEND)已广泛实施,尽管在阿巴拉契亚农村地区仍难以获得。尽管增加了 OEND,但对于未经培训的人,非基于证据的过量用药反应的风险因素仍不清楚。
我们招募了 169 名非医疗用途处方类阿片类药物的成年人,他们居住在西弗吉尼亚州农村地区(2014 年 8 月至 2015 年 3 月)。参与者接受了关于目睹过量用药(终身和前一年)、最近一次过量用药的特征、对过量用药的反应以及 OEND 可接受性的访谈。逻辑回归用于评估与非基于证据的过量用药反应相关的因素。
在 73 名目睹阿片类药物相关过量用药的参与者中,大多数(n=53,73%)报告了任何非基于证据的反应。当受害者无反应时,参与者报告非基于证据的反应的可能性显著增加(OR=3.36;95%CI=1.07,10.58)。常见的基于证据的反应包括在受害者等待救援时陪伴他们(n=66,90%)和拨打 911(n=63,86%),而最常见的非基于证据的反应是打或拍打受害者(n=37,51%)和用冰摩擦或将受害者置于冷水中或浴中(n=14,19%)。尽管大多数人(n=60,82%)从未听说过 OEND,但大多数人(n=69,95%)愿意接受培训,特别是那些报告非基于证据的反应的人(n=52,98%)。
这些发现强调了在农村社区扩大 OEND 获得途径的必要性,并表明 OEND 对在阿巴拉契亚农村地区使用阿片类药物的未经培训的人是可以接受的。鉴于该地区存在“减少伤害的荒漠”,应采取措施扩大 OEND。