Department of Exercise Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
Program of Gerontology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2023 Feb 1;134(2):230-241. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00416.2022. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
This study aims to investigate the effect of the menstrual cycle (MC) on exercise performance across the power-duration relationship (PDR). We hypothesized females would exhibit greater variability in the PDR across the MC than males across a similar timespan, with critical power (CP) and work-prime (') being lower during the early follicular phase than the late follicular and midluteal phases. Seven eumenorrheic, endurance-trained female adults performed multiple constant-load-to-task-failure and maximum-power tests at three timepoints across the MC (early follicular, late follicular, and midluteal phases). Ten endurance-trained male adults performed the same tests approximately 10 days apart. No differences across the PDR were observed between MC phases (CP: 186.74 ± 31.00 W, = 0.955, CV = 0.81 ± 0.65%) (': 7,961.81 ± 2,537.68 J, = 0.476, CV = 10.48 ± 3.06%). CP was similar for male and female subjects (11.82 ± 1.42 W·kg vs. 11.56 ± 1.51 W·kg, respectively) when controlling for leg lean mass. However, ' was larger ( = 0.047) for male subjects (617.28 ± 130.10 J·kg) than female subjects (490.03 ± 136.70 J·kg) when controlling for leg lean mass. MC phase does not need to be controlled when conducting aerobic endurance performance research on eumenorrheic female subjects without menstrual dysfunction. Nevertheless, several sex differences in the power-duration relationship exist, even after normalizing for body composition. Therefore, previous studies describing the physiology of exercise performance in male subjects may not perfectly describe that of female subjects. Females are often excluded from exercise performance research due to experimental challenges in controlling for the menstrual cycle (MC), causing uncertainty regarding how the MC impacts female performance. The present study examined the influences that biological sex and the MC have on the power-duration relationship (PDR) by comparing critical power (CP), Work-prime ('), and maximum power output () in males and females. Our data provide evidence that the MC does not influence the PDR and that females exhibit similar reproducibility as males. Thus, when conducting aerobic endurance exercise research on eumenorrheic females without menstrual dysfunction, the phase of the MC does not need to be controlled. Although differences in body composition account for some differences between the sexes, sex differences in ' and persisted even after normalizing for different metrics of body composition. These data highlight the necessity and feasibility of examining sex differences in performance, as previously generated male-only data within the literature may not apply to female subjects.
本研究旨在探究月经周期(MC)对功率-时间关系(PDR)中运动表现的影响。我们假设,在相似的时间段内,女性在 PDR 上的变异性将大于男性,且在卵泡早期,临界功率(CP)和工作-量(')低于卵泡晚期和黄体中期。7 名月经规律、耐力训练的成年女性在 MC 的三个时间点(卵泡早期、卵泡晚期和黄体中期)进行多次恒负荷至任务失败和最大功率测试。10 名耐力训练的成年男性在大约 10 天的时间内进行了相同的测试。在 PDR 上没有观察到 MC 阶段之间的差异(CP:186.74±31.00 W, = 0.955,CV=0.81±0.65%)(':7961.81±2537.68 J, = 0.476,CV=10.48±3.06%)。当控制腿瘦体重时,男性和女性受试者的 CP 相似(分别为 11.82±1.42 W·kg 和 11.56±1.51 W·kg)。然而,当控制腿瘦体重时,男性受试者的'(617.28±130.10 J·kg)大于女性受试者的'(490.03±136.70 J·kg)( = 0.047)。在月经规律的女性受试者中进行有氧耐力性能研究时,MC 阶段无需控制,而无月经功能障碍。然而,即使在对身体成分进行归一化后,在 PDR 中也存在几个性别差异。因此,以前描述男性受试者运动表现生理学的研究可能无法完全描述女性受试者的情况。由于控制月经周期(MC)的实验挑战,女性经常被排除在运动表现研究之外,这导致了 MC 如何影响女性表现的不确定性。本研究通过比较男性和女性的临界功率(CP)、工作-量(')和最大功率输出(),考察了生物性别和 MC 对功率-时间关系(PDR)的影响。我们的数据提供了证据表明,MC 不会影响 PDR,并且女性表现出与男性相似的可重复性。因此,在对无月经功能障碍的月经规律的女性进行有氧耐力运动研究时,无需控制 MC 阶段。尽管身体成分的差异解释了性别之间的一些差异,但在对不同身体成分指标进行归一化后,'和 的性别差异仍然存在。这些数据突出了检查性能性别差异的必要性和可行性,因为以前在文献中生成的男性独有的数据可能不适用于女性受试者。