Fukuba Yoshiyuki, Miura Akira, Endo Masako, Kan Akira, Yanagawa Kazumasa, Whipp Brian J
Department of Exercise Science and Physiology, School of Health Sciences, Hiroshima Prefectural Women's University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1413-8. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000079047.84364.70.
The tolerable duration (t) for high-intensity cycle ergometry bears a hyperbolic relationship to the power output (P) with an asymptote termed the critical power (CP), and a curvature constant (W') that is numerically equivalent to an amount of work that can be performed above CP. The physiological nature of W' has received little consideration compared with CP, e.g., whether the total amount of work above CP remains constant when the power actually changes during the high-intensity task.
The purpose of this study was to compare W' derived from the standard estimation method, consisting of several different constant-P tests, and the total amount of work above CP during an exhausting exercise bout using a variable-P protocol.
Eleven healthy male subjects (age: 21-40 yr) volunteered to participate in this study. Each initially performed four-to-six high-intensity square-wave exercise bouts for estimation of CP [mean (SD); 213.3 (22.4) W] and W' [12.68 (3.08) kJ]. The subjects subsequently performed two variable-P tests to the limit of tolerance. During the first part, P was 117% or 134% of CP for a duration that expended approximately half of W'. The work rate was then abruptly increased to 134% (UP protocol) or decreased to 117% (DOWN protocol) of CP for the second part.
There were no significant differences between W' [12.68 (3.08) kJ] and the total amount of work above CP during the UP [12.14 (4.18) kJ] and DOWN [12.72 (4.05) kJ] protocols (P > 0.05).
We conclude that the work equivalent of W' is not affected by power variations during exhausting cycle ergometry, at least in the P range of 100-134% of CP.
高强度周期测力法的可耐受时长(t)与功率输出(P)呈双曲线关系,其渐近线称为临界功率(CP),还有一个曲率常数(W'),其数值等同于在临界功率之上能够完成的工作量。与临界功率相比,W'的生理本质很少受到关注,例如,在高强度任务期间功率实际发生变化时,临界功率之上的总工作量是否保持恒定。
本研究的目的是比较通过由几种不同的恒定功率测试组成的标准估计方法得出的W',以及在使用可变功率方案的力竭性运动 bout 期间临界功率之上的总工作量。
11名健康男性受试者(年龄:21 - 40岁)自愿参与本研究。每位受试者最初进行四到六次高强度方波运动 bout,以估计CP[平均值(标准差);213.3(22.4)W]和W'[12.68(3.08)kJ]。受试者随后进行两次可变功率测试,直至耐受极限。在第一部分,功率为临界功率的117%或134%,持续时长消耗大约一半的W'。然后在第二部分,工作速率突然增加到临界功率的134%(上升方案)或降低到临界功率的117%(下降方案)。
在上升方案[12.14(4.18)kJ]和下降方案[12.72(4.05)kJ]期间,W'[12.68(3.08)kJ]与临界功率之上的总工作量之间无显著差异(P > 0.05)。
我们得出结论,至少在临界功率的100 - 134%的功率范围内,在力竭性周期测力法期间,W'的等效工作量不受功率变化的影响。