• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对口腔卫生质量的认知:新测量工具的开发与验证。

Patients' awareness regarding the quality of their oral hygiene: development and validation of a new measurement instrument.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Institute of Medical Psychology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Klinikstr. 29, 35392, Giessen, Germany.

, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 22;22(1):629. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02659-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-022-02659-4
PMID:36550463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9773685/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present research aimed to develop and validate a standardised survey instrument for the assessment of patients' awareness of the quality of their oral hygiene performance.

METHODS

A digital questionnaire was developed that assesses both patients' naïve self-perceptions of oral cleanliness (SPOC) after tooth brushing and patients' perceptions after being informed how oral cleanliness may be captured in dentistry (SPOC). Three studies (N = 56 adults, N = 66 adolescents and one of their parents, N = 24 university students) assessed the instrument's feasibility (patient reports), reliability (internal consistency), validity (correlation with other constructs; sensitivity to manipulation of actual tooth brushing), and the correlation with actual oral cleanliness after tooth brushing.

RESULTS

All study groups accepted the questionnaire well; average answering times were less than 5 min. Cronbach's α exceeds 0.90; correlational analyses support the discriminant validity regarding oral hygiene related self-efficacy expectations and stages of change; manipulation of oral hygiene behaviour results in the expected changes of SPOC scores. Patients' SPOC correlate only moderately with actual oral cleanliness. The comparison between SPOC scores and actual oral cleanliness indicate that they considerably overestimate their oral hygiene performance.

CONCLUSIONS

The SPOC questionnaire is an easy-to-use, well-accepted, reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of patients' awareness of the quality of their oral hygiene for research and clinical purposes. The results of the questionnaire may help to reveal unrealistic self-perceptions of patients regarding their oral hygiene. It can raise their awareness of the need to improve their skills and/or efforts in this regard. Trial registration The third study was an interventional study and was registered in the appropriate national register ( www.drks.de ; ID: DRKS00018781; date of registration: 12/09/2019).

摘要

背景

本研究旨在开发和验证一种标准化的调查工具,用于评估患者对口腔卫生质量的认知。

方法

开发了一种数字问卷,评估患者在刷牙后对口腔清洁的天真自我感知(SPOC)和在被告知口腔清洁如何在牙科中捕捉后对口腔清洁的感知(SPOC)。三项研究(N=56 名成年人、N=66 名青少年及其父母中的一名、N=24 名大学生)评估了该工具的可行性(患者报告)、可靠性(内部一致性)、有效性(与其他结构的相关性;对实际刷牙行为的操纵的敏感性),以及与刷牙后实际口腔清洁的相关性。

结果

所有研究组都很好地接受了问卷;平均回答时间不到 5 分钟。Cronbach's α 超过 0.90;相关分析支持与口腔卫生相关自我效能期望和改变阶段的区别有效性;口腔卫生行为的操纵导致 SPOC 评分的预期变化。患者的 SPOC 仅与实际口腔清洁中度相关。SPOC 评分与实际口腔清洁的比较表明,它们极大地高估了自己的口腔卫生表现。

结论

SPOC 问卷是一种易于使用、易于接受、可靠且有效的工具,可用于评估患者对口腔卫生质量的认知,用于研究和临床目的。问卷的结果可能有助于揭示患者对口腔卫生的不切实际的自我认知。它可以提高他们在这方面提高技能和/或努力的意识。试验注册:第三项研究是一项干预性研究,并在适当的国家登记处(www.drks.de;ID:DRKS00018781;登记日期:2019 年 9 月 12 日)进行了登记。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb2f/9783401/40d633ac6c17/12903_2022_2659_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb2f/9783401/415dd6ccbf12/12903_2022_2659_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb2f/9783401/891ddf38b873/12903_2022_2659_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb2f/9783401/40d633ac6c17/12903_2022_2659_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb2f/9783401/415dd6ccbf12/12903_2022_2659_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb2f/9783401/891ddf38b873/12903_2022_2659_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb2f/9783401/40d633ac6c17/12903_2022_2659_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Patients' awareness regarding the quality of their oral hygiene: development and validation of a new measurement instrument.患者对口腔卫生质量的认知:新测量工具的开发与验证。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 22;22(1):629. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02659-4.
2
"You should brush your teeth better": a randomized controlled trial comparing best-possible versus as-usual toothbrushing.“你应该更好地刷牙”:一项比较最佳可能刷牙和常规刷牙的随机对照试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 6;23(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03127-3.
3
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities.针对智障人士的口腔卫生干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 31;5(5):CD012628. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012628.pub2.
4
IQuaD dental trial; improving the quality of dentistry: a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing oral hygiene advice and periodontal instrumentation for the prevention and management of periodontal disease in dentate adults attending dental primary care.IQuaD 口腔试验;改善牙科质量:一项多中心随机对照试验,比较口腔卫生保健指导和牙周器械在预防和治疗接受初级口腔保健的有牙成年人牙周病中的效果。
BMC Oral Health. 2013 Oct 26;13:58. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-13-58.
5
Smoking, tooth brushing and oral cleanliness among 15-year-olds in Tehran, Iran.伊朗德黑兰15岁青少年的吸烟、刷牙与口腔清洁情况
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2008;6(1):45-51.
6
What is the best predictor for oral cleanliness after brushing? Results from an observational cohort study.刷牙后口腔清洁度的最佳预测指标是什么?一项观察性队列研究的结果。
J Periodontol. 2015 Jan;86(1):101-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.140152.
7
Application of a three-session-procedure based on experiential learning in a tooth brushing course for Chinese dental students.基于体验式学习的三阶段程序在口腔医学生刷牙课程中的应用。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Feb 4;19(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1471-8.
8
Interdental brushing for the prevention and control of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults.成人使用牙间隙刷预防和控制牙周疾病及龋齿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 18(12):CD009857. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009857.pub2.
9
Tooth brushing performance in adolescents as compared to the best-practice demonstrated in group prophylaxis programs: an observational study.青少年的刷牙效果与群体预防项目中展示的最佳实践相比:一项观察性研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jul 20;21(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01692-z.
10
Oral hygiene knowledge versus behavior in children: A questionnaire-based, interview-style analysis and on-site assessment of toothbrushing practices.儿童口腔卫生知识与行为:基于问卷的访谈式分析及现场刷牙习惯评估。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Oct;8(5):1167-1174. doi: 10.1002/cre2.607. Epub 2022 Jun 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Making plaque assessment easier - a validation study of simplified versions of the Marginal Plaque Index.使牙菌斑评估更简单——简化版边际菌斑指数的验证研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 14;24(1):1377. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05168-8.
2
It is the habit not the handle that affects tooth brushing - a randomised counterbalanced cross over study with young and healthy adults.影响刷牙效果的是习惯而非牙刷——一项针对年轻健康成年人的随机、平衡、交叉研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jul 2;24(1):757. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04538-6.
3
Assessing sugar intake rapidly - a short form of the Marburg Sugar Index (MSI).

本文引用的文献

1
Good role models? Tooth brushing capabilities of parents: a video observation study.好榜样?父母的刷牙能力:一项视频观察研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Sep 24;21(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01823-6.
2
Tooth brushing performance in adolescents as compared to the best-practice demonstrated in group prophylaxis programs: an observational study.青少年的刷牙效果与群体预防项目中展示的最佳实践相比:一项观察性研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jul 20;21(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01692-z.
3
A public health approach for prevention of periodontal disease.
快速评估糖摄入量 - 马尔堡糖指数(MSI)的简短形式。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Sep 29;23(1):702. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03403-2.
4
"You should brush your teeth better": a randomized controlled trial comparing best-possible versus as-usual toothbrushing.“你应该更好地刷牙”:一项比较最佳可能刷牙和常规刷牙的随机对照试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jul 6;23(1):456. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03127-3.
公共卫生方法预防牙周病。
Periodontol 2000. 2020 Oct;84(1):202-214. doi: 10.1111/prd.12337.
4
Self-Reported Oral Health, Oral Hygiene and Associated Factors in Lithuanian Adult Population, 1994-2014.《1994-2014 年立陶宛成年人群的自我报告口腔健康、口腔卫生及其相关因素》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 24;17(15):5331. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155331.
5
Oral cleanliness in daily users of powered vs. manual toothbrushes - a cross-sectional study.日常使用电动牙刷与手动牙刷人群的口腔清洁状况 - 一项横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 May 29;19(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0790-9.
6
Methods for questionnaire design: a taxonomy linking procedures to test goals.问卷设计方法:将程序与测试目标联系起来的分类法。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Sep;28(9):2501-2512. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02209-6. Epub 2019 May 18.
7
Oral hygiene habits in Portugal: results from the first Health Examination Survey (INSEF 2015).葡萄牙口腔卫生习惯:第一次健康检查调查(INSEF 2015)结果。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2019 Jul;77(5):334-339. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2018.1564839. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
8
Toothbrushing: to the best of one's abilities is possibly not good enough.刷牙:尽最大努力可能还不够好。
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Oct 19;18(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0633-0.
9
The Prevalence and Associated Factors of Periodontal Disease among 35 to 44-year-old Chinese Adults in the 4th National Oral Health Survey.第四次全国口腔健康调查中35至44岁中国成年人牙周病的患病率及相关因素
Chin J Dent Res. 2018;21(4):241-247. doi: 10.3290/j.cjdr.a41082.
10
Dental plaque-induced gingival conditions.牙菌斑引起的牙龈疾病。
J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S17-S27. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0095.