Naciri Tayma, Monnin Boris, Pantel Alix, Roger Claire, Kinowski Jean-Marie, Loubet Paul, Lavigne Jean-Philippe, Sotto Albert, Larcher Romaric
Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, Nimes University Hospital, 30000 Nimes, France.
VBIC (Bacterial Virulence and Chronic Infection), INSERM (French Institute of Health and Medical Research), Montpellier University, Department of Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Nimes University Hospital, 30000 Nimes, France.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Dec 9;11(12):1786. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11121786.
Background: In the case of intra-abdominal infections (IAI) in beta-lactam (BL) allergic patients, empiric antimicrobial therapy without BL is recommended; however, data regarding the outcome with alternative regimens are scarce. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of BL allergic (BLA) patients with IAI to those who were non-BLA (NBLA). Method: We conducted a case−control study in a French teaching hospital, between 1 January 2016 and 31 August 2021. BLA patients with IAI treated with fluoroquinolone or aztreonam and metronidazole were matched with controls treated with BL, on age, sex, disease severity, IAI localization, and healthcare-associated infection (HAI) status. We compared rates of therapeutic failures, adverse events, and HAI, and then assessed factors associated with therapeutic failure using a logistic regression model. Results: The therapeutic failure rate was 14% (p > 0.99) in both groups of 43 patients, and there was no significant difference in the adverse events rate (p > 0.99) and HAI rate (p = 0.154). Factors independently associated with therapeutic failure were higher BMI (OR 1.16; 95%CI [1.00−1.36]; p = 0.041), longer hospital length of stay (OR 1,20; 95%CI [1.08−1.41]; p = 0.006), and inadequate empiric antimicrobial therapy (OR 11.71; 95%CI [1.43−132.46]; p = 0.025). Conclusion: The outcomes of BLA patients with IAI treated without BL were the same as those for NBLA patients treated with BL.
对于β-内酰胺(BL)过敏的腹腔内感染(IAI)患者,建议采用无BL的经验性抗菌治疗;然而,关于替代方案疗效的数据稀缺。本研究旨在比较IAI的BL过敏(BLA)患者与非BL过敏(NBLA)患者的治疗结果。方法:我们于2016年1月1日至2021年8月31日在一家法国教学医院进行了一项病例对照研究。将接受氟喹诺酮或氨曲南及甲硝唑治疗的IAI的BLA患者,在年龄、性别、疾病严重程度、IAI部位和医疗相关感染(HAI)状态方面与接受BL治疗的对照患者进行匹配。我们比较了治疗失败率、不良事件发生率和HAI发生率,然后使用逻辑回归模型评估与治疗失败相关的因素。结果:两组各43例患者的治疗失败率均为14%(p>0.99),不良事件发生率(p>0.99)和HAI发生率(p = 0.154)无显著差异。与治疗失败独立相关的因素包括较高的体重指数(OR 1.16;95%CI[1.00−1.36];p = 0.041)、较长的住院时间(OR 1.20;95%CI[1.08−1.41];p = 0.006)和经验性抗菌治疗不足(OR 11.71;95%CI[1.43−132.46];p = 0.025)。结论:未接受BL治疗的IAI的BLA患者的治疗结果与接受BL治疗的NBLA患者相同。