Winters S L, Stewart D, Gomes J A
Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Oct;10(4):775-81. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(87)80269-3.
Forty patients with syncope of unknown origin underwent quantitative signal averaging of the surface QRS complex before invasive electrophysiologic testing with programmed ventricular stimulation. Of 34 patients without bundle branch block, 12 had inducible ventricular tachycardia (Group I) and 22 did not (Group II). The duration of low amplitude signals, the root mean square voltage of the terminal 40 ms and the signal-averaged QRS vector duration were measured in each case. One or more abnormal signal averaging variables were present in 92% of patients in Group I, but in only 27% of patients in Group II (p less than 0.005). An abnormal root mean square voltage of the terminal 40 ms was the most significant distinguishing variable, being present in 83% of Group I patients and in only 14% of Group II patients (p less than 0.005). The QRS vector duration was prolonged in 58% of Group I patients, but in only 9% of Group II patients (p less than 0.05). Likewise, the duration of low amplitude signals was prolonged in 58% of Group I patients, but in only 19% of Group II patients (p less than 0.05). When compared with 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring, the presence of abnormal signal averaging variables was more predictive of inducible ventricular tachycardia. Seven (32%) Group II patients had greater than or equal to 10 ventricular premature beats/h, couplets or episodes of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia; however, none had abnormal late potentials recorded. In contrast, three patients (25%) in Group I had less than 10 ventricular premature beats/h, although all in that group had one or more abnormal signal-averaged variables.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
40例不明原因晕厥患者在进行程控心室刺激的有创电生理检查前,接受了体表QRS波群的定量信号平均分析。在34例无束支传导阻滞的患者中,12例可诱发室性心动过速(I组),22例不能诱发(II组)。分别测量了每组患者低振幅信号的持续时间、终末40毫秒的均方根电压以及信号平均QRS向量的持续时间。I组92%的患者存在一个或多个异常信号平均变量,而II组仅27%的患者存在异常信号平均变量(p<0.005)。终末40毫秒的均方根电压异常是最显著的鉴别变量,I组83%的患者存在该异常,而II组仅14%的患者存在(p<0.005)。I组58%的患者QRS向量持续时间延长,而II组仅9%的患者出现该情况(p<0.05)。同样,I组58%的患者低振幅信号持续时间延长,而II组仅19%的患者出现该情况(p<0.05)。与24小时动态心电图监测相比,异常信号平均变量的存在对可诱发室性心动过速更具预测价值。II组7例(32%)患者每小时室性早搏≥10次、成对室性早搏或非持续性室性心动过速发作;然而,均未记录到异常晚电位。相比之下,I组3例(25%)患者每小时室性早搏少于10次,尽管该组所有患者均有一个或多个异常信号平均变量。(摘要截短于250字)