Chao Tze-Fan, Chan Yi-Hsin, Tsai Pei-Chien, Lee Hsin-Fu, Chang Shang-Hung, Kuo Chi-Tai, Lip Gregory Y H, Chen Shih-Ann, Yeh Yung-Hsin
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan.
Cardiovascular Research Center, Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan.
Biomedicines. 2022 Dec 10;10(12):3210. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10123210.
Background: Although direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are considered to be safe, over or under anticoagulation and increased bleeding or thromboembolic risk are still considered individually. We aimed to investigate whether there is an association between prothrombin time and international normalized ratio (PT-INR) or activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) ratio, and the risks of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (IS/SE) and major bleeding among AF patients taking rivaroxaban or dabigatran. Methods: This multi-center cohort study in Taiwan included 3192 AF patients taking rivaroxaban and 958 patients taking dabigatran for stroke prevention where data about PT-INR and aPTT were available. Results: For patients treated with rivaroxaban, a higher INR level was not associated with a higher risk of major bleeding compared to an INR level < 1.1. The risk of IS/SE was lower for patients having an INR ≥ 1.5 compared to those with an INR < 1.1 (aHR:0.57; [95%CI: 0.37−0.87]; p = 0.01). On-label dosing of rivaroxaban and use of digoxin were independent factors associated with an INR ≥ 1.5 after taking rivaroxaban. For patients taking dabigatran, a higher aPTT ratio was not associated with a higher risk of major bleeding. The risk of IS/SE was lower for patients having an aPTT ratio of 1.1−1.2 and 1.3−1.4 than those with an aPTT ratio < 1.1. Conclusions: In AF patients, rivaroxaban with an INR ≥ 1.5 was associated with a lower risk of IS/SE. PT-INR or aPTT ratios were not associated with bleeding events for rivaroxaban or dabigatran. INR may help predict the outcome of AF patients who take rivaroxaban.
尽管心房颤动(AF)患者使用直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)被认为是安全的,但抗凝过度或不足以及出血或血栓栓塞风险增加仍需单独考虑。我们旨在研究凝血酶原时间与国际标准化比值(PT-INR)或活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)比值之间是否存在关联,以及服用利伐沙班或达比加群的AF患者发生缺血性卒中/全身性栓塞(IS/SE)和大出血的风险。方法:这项在台湾进行的多中心队列研究纳入了3192名服用利伐沙班预防卒中的AF患者和958名服用达比加群的患者,这些患者有PT-INR和aPTT的数据。结果:对于接受利伐沙班治疗的患者,与INR水平<1.1相比,较高的INR水平与大出血风险增加无关。与INR<1.1的患者相比,INR≥1.5的患者发生IS/SE的风险更低(校正风险比:0.57;[95%置信区间:0.37 - 0.87];p = 0.01)。利伐沙班的标签剂量给药和地高辛的使用是服用利伐沙班后INR≥1.5的独立相关因素。对于服用达比加群的患者,较高的aPTT比值与大出血风险增加无关。aPTT比值为1.1 - 1.2和1.3 - 1.4的患者发生IS/SE的风险低于aPTT比值<1.1的患者。结论:在AF患者中,INR≥1.5的利伐沙班与较低的IS/SE风险相关。PT-INR或aPTT比值与利伐沙班或达比加群的出血事件无关。INR可能有助于预测服用利伐沙班的AF患者的结局。