Amin Alpesh, Keshishian Allison, Trocio Jeffrey, Dina Oluwaseyi, Le Hannah, Rosenblatt Lisa, Liu Xianchen, Mardekian Jack, Zhang Qisu, Baser Onur, Vo Lien
a University of California , Irvine , CA , USA.
b STATinMED Research , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Sep;33(9):1595-1604. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1345729. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
To compare the risk and cost of stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major bleeding between each direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and warfarin among non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients.
Patients (≥65 years) initiating warfarin or DOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran) were selected from the Medicare database from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2014. Patients initiating each DOAC were matched 1:1 to warfarin patients using propensity score matching to balance demographics and clinical characteristics. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risks of stroke/SE and major bleeding of each DOAC vs. warfarin. Two-part models were used to compare the stroke/SE- and major-bleeding-related medical costs between matched cohorts.
Of the 186,132 eligible patients, 20,803 apixaban-warfarin pairs, 52,476 rivaroxaban-warfarin pairs, and 16,731 dabigatran-warfarin pairs were matched. Apixaban (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.31, 0.53) and rivaroxaban (HR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.63, 0.83) were significantly associated with lower risk of stroke/SE compared to warfarin. Apixaban (HR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.44, 0.58) and dabigatran (HR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.69, 0.91) were significantly associated with lower risk of major bleeding; rivaroxaban (HR = 1.17; 95% CI 1.10, 1.26) was significantly associated with higher risk of major bleeding compared to warfarin. Compared to warfarin, apixaban ($63 vs. $131) and rivaroxaban ($93 vs. $139) had significantly lower stroke/SE-related medical costs; apixaban ($292 vs. $529) and dabigatran ($369 vs. $450) had significantly lower major bleeding-related medical costs.
Among the DOACs in the study, only apixaban is associated with a significantly lower risk of stroke/SE and major bleeding and lower related medical costs compared to warfarin.
比较非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者中各直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)与华法林之间发生卒中/全身性栓塞(SE)和大出血的风险及成本。
选取2013年1月1日至2014年12月31日医疗保险数据库中开始使用华法林或DOAC(阿哌沙班、利伐沙班和达比加群)的患者(≥65岁)。使用倾向得分匹配法将开始使用每种DOAC的患者与华法林患者按1:1匹配,以平衡人口统计学和临床特征。采用Cox比例风险模型估计每种DOAC与华法林相比发生卒中/SE和大出血的风险。使用两部分模型比较匹配队列之间与卒中/SE和大出血相关的医疗成本。
在186,132例符合条件的患者中,匹配了20,803对阿哌沙班-华法林、52,476对利伐沙班-华法林和16,731对达比加群-华法林。与华法林相比,阿哌沙班(风险比[HR]=0.40;95%置信区间[CI]0.31,0.53)和利伐沙班(HR=0.72;95%CI0.63,0.83)与较低的卒中/SE风险显著相关。阿哌沙班(HR=0.51;95%CI0.44,0.58)和达比加群(HR=0.79;95%CI0.69,0.91)与较低的大出血风险显著相关;与华法林相比,利伐沙班(HR=1.17;95%CI1.10,1.26)与较高的大出血风险显著相关。与华法林相比,阿哌沙班(63美元对131美元)和利伐沙班(93美元对139美元)的卒中/SE相关医疗成本显著更低;阿哌沙班(292美元对529美元)和达比加群(369美元对450美元)的大出血相关医疗成本显著更低。
在本研究的DOAC中,与华法林相比,只有阿哌沙班与显著更低的卒中/SE和大出血风险以及更低的相关医疗成本相关。