• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共济失调评定量表:通过与《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》相联系进行内容分析。

Ataxia Rating Scales: Content Analysis by Linking to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

作者信息

Etoom Mohammad, Jahan Alhadi M, Alghwiri Alia, Lena Francesco, Modugno Nicola

机构信息

Physical Therapy Department, Aqaba University of Technology, Aqaba 77110, Jordan.

School of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4W7, Canada.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 5;10(12):2459. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122459.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare10122459
PMID:36553983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9778645/
Abstract

Ataxia management is mainly based on rehabilitation, symptomatic management, and functional improvement. Therefore, it is important to comprehensively assess ataxic symptoms and their impact on function. Recently, the movement disorders society recommended four generic ataxia rating scales: scale for assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA), international cooperative ataxia rating scales, Friedreich's ataxia rating scale (FARS), and unified multiple system atrophy rating scale (UMSARS). The aim of the study was to analyze and compare the content of the recommended ataxia rating scales by linking them to the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). A total of 125 meaningful concepts from 93 items of the four included scales were linked to 57 different ICF categories. The ICF categories were distributed in body structure ( = 8), body function ( = 26), activity and participation ( = 20), and environmental factors ( = 3) components. UMSARS and FARS were the only ones that have addressed the body structure or environmental factors component. The content analysis of ataxia rating scales would help clinicians and researchers select the most appropriate scale and understand ataxic symptoms and their impact on function. It seems that SARA is the optimal scale for rapid assessment of ataxia or in busy clinical settings. UMSARS or FARS are more appropriate for the investigating the impact of ataxia on overall health, and monitoring ataxia progression and disability.

摘要

共济失调的管理主要基于康复、对症治疗和功能改善。因此,全面评估共济失调症状及其对功能的影响非常重要。最近,运动障碍协会推荐了四种通用的共济失调评定量表:共济失调评估与评定量表(SARA)、国际合作共济失调评定量表、弗里德赖希共济失调评定量表(FARS)和统一多系统萎缩评定量表(UMSARS)。本研究的目的是通过将推荐的共济失调评定量表与国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)相联系,来分析和比较它们的内容。四个纳入量表的93个条目中共有125个有意义的概念与57个不同的ICF类别相联系。这些ICF类别分布在身体结构(=8)、身体功能(=26)、活动与参与(=20)和环境因素(=3)等组成部分中。UMSARS和FARS是仅涉及身体结构或环境因素组成部分的量表。共济失调评定量表的内容分析将有助于临床医生和研究人员选择最合适的量表,并了解共济失调症状及其对功能的影响。似乎SARA是快速评估共济失调或在繁忙临床环境中使用的最佳量表。UMSARS或FARS更适合于研究共济失调对整体健康的影响,以及监测共济失调的进展和残疾情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d531/9778645/37a6fc2bc800/healthcare-10-02459-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d531/9778645/37a6fc2bc800/healthcare-10-02459-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d531/9778645/37a6fc2bc800/healthcare-10-02459-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Ataxia Rating Scales: Content Analysis by Linking to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.共济失调评定量表:通过与《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》相联系进行内容分析。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 5;10(12):2459. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10122459.
2
Clinical evidence of interventions assessed in Friedreich ataxia: a systematic review.对弗里德赖希共济失调所评估干预措施的临床证据:一项系统评价。
Ther Adv Rare Dis. 2022 Nov 29;3:26330040221139872. doi: 10.1177/26330040221139872. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
3
Assessment of Ataxia Rating Scales and Cerebellar Functional Tests: Critique and Recommendations.共济失调评定量表与小脑功能测试的评估:批判与建议
Mov Disord. 2021 Feb;36(2):283-297. doi: 10.1002/mds.28313. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
4
Content analysis of 4 fear of falling rating scales by linking to the international classification of functioning, disability and health.通过与国际功能、残疾和健康分类相联系,对 4 种恐惧跌倒评定量表进行内容分析。
PM R. 2013 Jul;5(7):573-582.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
5
The measurement of functioning using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: comparing qualifier ratings with existing health status instruments.使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类测量功能:qualifier 评级与现有健康状况量表的比较。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Mar;41(5):541-548. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1381186. Epub 2017 Oct 8.
6
Application of a Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) in Friedreich's ataxia patients according to posturography is limited.根据姿势描记法,共济失调评估与分级量表(SARA)在弗里德赖希共济失调患者中的应用有限。
J Neurol Sci. 2014 Jun 15;341(1-2):64-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
7
Analyzing the modified rankin scale using concepts of the international classification of functioning, disability and health.使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类的概念分析改良 Rankin 量表。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Apr;52(2):203-13. Epub 2015 May 26.
8
Validity and reliability of the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) and the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) in multiple sclerosis patients with ataxia.多发性硬化症伴共济失调患者国际合作共济失调评分量表(ICARS)和共济失调评估与评分量表(SARA)的有效性和可靠性。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017 Nov;18:135-140. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.09.032. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
9
Linking of assessment scales for women with urinary incontinence and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.将尿失禁女性评估量表与国际功能、残疾和健康分类相联系。
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Jun;41(12):1443-1449. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1431695. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
10
Activity rating scales in adult muscle disease: what do they actually measure?成人肌肉疾病的活动评分量表:它们实际测量的是什么?
Muscle Nerve. 2014 Jul;50(1):14-23. doi: 10.1002/mus.24093. Epub 2014 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Conversion Table Linking Functional Independence Measure Scores to International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Qualifiers: Insights from a Survey of Healthcare Professionals.建立将功能独立性测量分数与《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》限定词相关联的转换表:来自医疗保健专业人员调查的见解
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Apr 15;12(8):831. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12080831.

本文引用的文献

1
ICF Linking and Cognitive Interviewing Are Complementary Methods for Optimizing Content Validity of Outcome Measures: An Integrated Methods Review.《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》关联与认知访谈是优化结局指标内容效度的互补方法:综合方法综述
Front Rehabil Sci. 2021 Oct 14;2:702596. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2021.702596. eCollection 2021.
2
Content comparison of neck pain outcome measures using the international classification of functioning, disability and health.使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类对颈部疼痛结局测量进行内容比较。
Int J Rehabil Res. 2022 Mar 1;45(1):24-32. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000508.
3
Are fatigue scales the same? A content comparison using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.
疲劳量表都一样吗?使用《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》进行的内容比较。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020 Nov;46:102596. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102596. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
4
Assessment of Ataxia Rating Scales and Cerebellar Functional Tests: Critique and Recommendations.共济失调评定量表与小脑功能测试的评估:批判与建议
Mov Disord. 2021 Feb;36(2):283-297. doi: 10.1002/mds.28313. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
5
Health related quality of life in Friedreich Ataxia in a large heterogeneous cohort.大型异质性队列中弗里德赖希共济失调患者的健康相关生活质量
J Neurol Sci. 2020 Mar 15;410:116642. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.116642. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
6
Multiple System Atrophy: Recent Developments and Future Perspectives.多系统萎缩症:最新进展与未来展望。
Mov Disord. 2019 Nov;34(11):1629-1642. doi: 10.1002/mds.27894. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
7
Sporadic adult-onset ataxia.散发性成人起病共济失调
Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;155:217-225. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64189-2.00014-7.
8
Rehabilitation for Individuals With Genetic Degenerative Ataxia: A Systematic Review.遗传性退行性共济失调患者的康复治疗:一项系统综述
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Jul;31(7):609-622. doi: 10.1177/1545968317712469. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
9
More Than Ataxia: Hyperkinetic Movement Disorders in Childhood Autosomal Recessive Ataxia Syndromes.不止共济失调:儿童常染色体隐性共济失调综合征中的运动障碍
Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2016 Jul 16;6:368. doi: 10.7916/D8H70FSS. eCollection 2016.
10
The development of the ICF vestibular environmental scale.国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)前庭环境量表的开发。
J Vestib Res. 2016 Jul 2;26(3):297-302. doi: 10.3233/VES-160580.