Suppr超能文献

对闪蒸-双循环地热发电厂废热驱动的有机朗肯循环(ORC)的4E评估。

4E Assessment of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) Activated with Waste Heat of a Flash-Binary Geothermal Power Plant.

作者信息

Ambriz-Díaz Víctor M, Rosas Israel Y, Chávez Oscar, Rubio-Maya Carlos

机构信息

Tecnológico Nacional de México/I. T. Chihuahua, Av. Tecnológico, 2909, Chihuahua 31310, Chihuahua, Mexico.

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, "W" Building, Central Campus, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolas de Hidalgo, Morelia 58030, Michoacán, Mexico.

出版信息

Entropy (Basel). 2022 Dec 15;24(12):1832. doi: 10.3390/e24121832.

Abstract

In this paper, the 4E assessment (Energetic, Exergetic, Exergoeconomic and Exergoenvironmental) of a low-temperature ORC activated by two different alternatives is presented. The first alternative (S1) contemplates the activation of the ORC through the recovery of waste heat from a flash-binary geothermal power plant. The second alternative (S2) contemplates the activation of the ORC using direct heat from a geothermal well. For both alternatives, the energetic and exergetic models were established. At the same time, the economic and environmental impact models were developed. Finally, based on the combination of the exergy concepts and the economic and ecological indicators, the exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental performances of the ORC were obtained. The results show higher economic, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental profitability for S1. Besides, for the alternative S1, the ORC cycle has an acceptable economic profitability for a net power of 358.4 kW at a temperature of 110 °C, while for S2, this profitability starts being attractive for a power 2.65 times greater than S1 and with a temperature higher than 135 °C. In conclusion, the above represents an area of opportunity and a considerable advantage for the implementation of the ORC in the recovery of waste heat from flash-binary geothermal power plants.

摘要

本文介绍了由两种不同方案驱动的低温有机朗肯循环(ORC)的4E评估(能量、㶲、㶲经济和㶲环境)。第一种方案(S1)考虑通过回收闪蒸-双循环地热发电厂的废热来驱动ORC。第二种方案(S2)考虑利用地热井的直接热量来驱动ORC。针对这两种方案,都建立了能量和㶲模型。同时,还开发了经济和环境影响模型。最后,基于㶲概念与经济和生态指标的结合,得出了ORC的㶲经济和㶲环境性能。结果表明,S1具有更高的经济、㶲经济和㶲环境盈利能力。此外,对于方案S1,在110°C的温度下,当净功率为358.4kW时,ORC循环具有可接受的经济盈利能力,而对于S2,当功率比S1大2.65倍且温度高于135°C时,这种盈利能力才开始具有吸引力。总之,上述情况为ORC在闪蒸-双循环地热发电厂废热回收中的应用提供了一个机遇领域和显著优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3483/9778020/10856ab005c2/entropy-24-01832-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验