Department of Sociology, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 9;19(24):16543. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416543.
A large body of research shows that children who live with two married biological parents have lower levels of externalizing and internalizing behavior problems compared to their peers in other family structure, including cohabitating biological families. Such patterns suggest that marriage provides a uniquely protective family environment, though we know less about children in the obvious counterfactual case: married stepfamilies. While research suggests children with stepfathers have more behavior problems than those living with married biological parents, we know little about how children with stepmothers fare, or how children with stepparents fare compared to those living with cohabiting biological parents. We use the Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) sweep 6 to compare children living with married biological parents, married fathers and stepmothers, and cohabiting biological parents. We find that family structure has no significant relationship with children's internalizing behavior problems, but that children living with a stepmother and biological cohabitating families exhibit more externalizing behavior problems than do those living with married biological parents. Covariates that indicate both physical and social family environments must be considered together to explain differences in married-parent families on externalizing behavior problems.
大量研究表明,与其他家庭结构(包括同居的亲生家庭)中的同龄人相比,与已婚亲生父母生活在一起的儿童外化和内化行为问题的水平较低。这些模式表明,婚姻提供了一种独特的保护性家庭环境,但我们对明显的反事实情况(即已婚继亲家庭)中的儿童了解较少。虽然有研究表明,有继父的儿童比与亲生父母结婚的儿童有更多的行为问题,但我们对继母家庭中的儿童的情况知之甚少,也不知道有继父继母的儿童与与同居亲生父母生活的儿童相比情况如何。我们使用千禧年队列研究(MCS)第六次普查来比较与已婚亲生父母、已婚父亲和继母以及同居亲生父母一起生活的儿童。我们发现,家庭结构与儿童的内化行为问题没有显著关系,但与与已婚亲生父母生活的儿童相比,与继母和同居亲生父母生活的儿童表现出更多的外化行为问题。必须同时考虑表明身体和社会家庭环境的协变量,才能解释在有亲生父母的家庭中外化行为问题上的差异。