Cardiology Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650032, China.
Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 18;19(24):17018. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192417018.
(1) Background: Targeting a sample of Chinese employees in this study, the correlation of work stress with changes in quality of life (QoL) was explored subsequent to acute coronary syndrome (ACS). (2) Methods: Patients suffering from the first ACS episode, with regular paid work before ACS, were eligible for this one-year longitudinal study. Effort-reward imbalance (ERI), together with job strain (JS) models, were employed to evaluate work stress before discharge, and QoL prior to discharge (baseline), as well as at 1, 6, and 12 months following discharge, were measured using the 8-Items Short Form (SF-8), in addition to the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). Moreover, generalized estimating equations were used to determine the relationship of work stress to longitudinal QoL variations. (3) Results: After adjusting for covariates, high work stress at the baseline measured by JS was associated with the slow recovery of both mental health ( < 0.01) and physical health ( < 0.05) in SF-8, while ERI-measured work stress was related to slower improvement in SF-8 physical health ( < 0.001), SAQ-angina stability (AS) ( < 0.05), SF-8 mental health ( < 0.001), and SAQ-angina frequency (AF) ( < 0.05). After mutual adjustment for JS and ERI, high work stress as assessed by JS displayed no correlation with any QoL alteration (all > 0.05), whereas ERI-determined work stress at a high level still presented a relationship to slow improvement in SF-8 physical health, SAQ-AS, SF-8 mental health, and SAQ-AF (all < 0.05). (4) Conclusion: Work stress was associated with slow recovery of QoL in patients with ACS across one year. For ACS patients, ERI was a stronger predictor of QoL variations than JS.
(1)背景:本研究以中国员工为研究对象,探讨了急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)后工作压力与生活质量(QoL)变化的相关性。(2)方法:本纵向研究纳入了首次 ACS 发作且 ACS 前有规律有偿工作的患者。在出院前使用努力-回报失衡(ERI)和工作压力模型(JS)评估工作压力,使用 8 项简明健康调查问卷(SF-8)和西雅图心绞痛问卷(SAQ)在出院前(基线)、出院后 1、6 和 12 个月测量 QoL。此外,使用广义估计方程确定工作压力与 QoL 变化的纵向关系。(3)结果:在校正协变量后,基线时 JS 测量的高工作压力与 SF-8 中心理健康(<0.01)和身体健康(<0.05)的恢复速度较慢有关,而 ERI 测量的工作压力与 SF-8 身体健康(<0.001)、SAQ-稳定性心绞痛(AS)(<0.05)、SF-8 心理健康(<0.001)和 SAQ-频率心绞痛(AF)(<0.05)的改善速度较慢有关。在对 JS 和 ERI 进行相互调整后,JS 评估的高工作压力与任何 QoL 变化均无相关性(均>0.05),而 ERI 确定的高水平工作压力仍与 SF-8 身体健康、SAQ-AS、SF-8 心理健康和 SAQ-AF 的改善速度较慢有关(均<0.05)。(4)结论:工作压力与 ACS 患者一年内心脏健康的恢复速度较慢有关。对于 ACS 患者,ERI 是预测 QoL 变化的更强指标,而不是 JS。