Nateghi Haredasht Fateme, Viaene Liesbeth, Vens Celine, Callewaert Nico, De Corte Wouter, Pottel Hans
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Campus KULAK, Etienne Sabbelaan 53, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium.
ITEC-Imec, KU Leuven, Etienne Sabbelaan 51, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium.
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 7;11(24):7264. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247264.
Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients is associated with a significant increase in mortality as well as long-term renal dysfunction and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Serum creatinine (SCr), the most widely used biomarker to evaluate kidney function, does not always accurately predict the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), since it is affected by some non-GFR determinants such as muscle mass and recent meat ingestion. Researchers and clinicians have gained interest in cystatin C (CysC), another biomarker of kidney function. The study objective was to compare GFR estimation using SCr and CysC in detecting CKD over a 1-year follow-up after an AKI stage-3 event in the ICU, as well as to analyze the association between eGFR (using SCr and CysC) and mortality after the AKI event. Method: This prospective observational study used the medical records of ICU patients diagnosed with AKI stage 3. SCr and CysC were measured twice during the ICU stay and four times following diagnosis of AKI. The eGFR was calculated using the EKFC equation for SCr and FAS equation for CysC in order to check the prevalence of CKD (defined as eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Results: The study enrolled 101 patients, 36.6% of whom were female, with a median age of 74 years (30−92), and a median length of stay of 14.5 days in intensive care. A significant difference was observed in the estimation of GFR when comparing formulas based on SCrand CysC, resulting in large differences in the prediction of CKD. Three months after the AKI event, eGFRCysC < 25 mL/min/1.73 m2 was a predictive factor of mortality later on; however, this was not the case for eGFRSCr. Conclusion: The incidence of CKD was highly discrepant with eGFRCysC versus eGFRSCr during the follow-up period. CysC detects more CKD events compared to SCr in the follow-up phase and eGFRCysC is a predictor for mortality in follow-up but not eGFRSCr. Determining the proper marker to estimate GFR in the post-ICU period in AKI stage-3 populations needs further study to improve risk stratification.
危重症患者的急性肾损伤(AKI)与死亡率显著增加以及长期肾功能障碍和慢性肾脏病(CKD)相关。血清肌酐(SCr)是评估肾功能最常用的生物标志物,但由于其受肌肉量和近期肉类摄入量等一些非肾小球滤过率(GFR)决定因素的影响,并不总能准确预测肾小球滤过率。研究人员和临床医生对另一种肾功能生物标志物胱抑素C(CysC)产生了兴趣。本研究的目的是比较在ICU发生3期AKI事件后1年的随访中,使用SCr和CysC估算GFR在检测CKD方面的情况,并分析AKI事件后估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR,分别使用SCr和CysC计算)与死亡率之间的关联。方法:这项前瞻性观察性研究使用了诊断为3期AKI的ICU患者的病历。在ICU住院期间对SCr和CysC进行了两次测量,在AKI诊断后又进行了四次测量。为了检查CKD(定义为eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m²)的患病率,分别使用针对SCr的EKFC方程和针对CysC的FAS方程计算eGFR。结果:该研究纳入了101例患者,其中36.6%为女性,中位年龄为74岁(30 - 92岁),在重症监护室的中位住院时间为14.5天。比较基于SCr和CysC的公式估算GFR时,观察到显著差异,导致在CKD预测方面存在很大差异。AKI事件发生三个月后,eGFRCysC<25 mL/min/1.73 m²是后期死亡率的预测因素;然而,eGFRSCr并非如此。结论:在随访期间,CKD的发生率在eGFRCysC与eGFRSCr之间存在高度差异。在随访阶段,与SCr相比,CysC能检测到更多的CKD事件,并且eGFRCysC是随访中死亡率的预测指标,而eGFRSCr不是指标。确定在3期AKI人群的ICU后时期估算GFR的合适标志物,需要进一步研究以改善风险分层。