Kennedy H L, Sprague M K, Shriver K K, Smith S C, Whitlock J A, Wiens R D
Department of Internal Medicine, St. Louis University Medical Center, Missouri 63104.
J Electrocardiol. 1987 Jul;20(3):247-54. doi: 10.1016/s0022-0736(87)80023-7.
To evaluate the technical reliability, clinical applicability, and arrhythmia accuracy of one manufacturer's real-time analysis ambulatory ECG instrument (Aegis Medical Systems), 164 patients were simultaneously examined through a "Y" cable by both a real-time analyzer and a conventional Holter recorder. Technical failure was similar for both recorders (2% in each), and the real-time analyzer was applicable to all patients encountered. Using a randomly selected hand-counted database of 799 hours as the standard of truth, accuracy of the real-time analyzer for hourly mean heart rate, isolated ventricular ectopic beats, ventricular couplets, ventricular tachycardia, isolated supraventricular ectopic beats and supraventricular tachycardia was determined. Mean heart rate showed 96% agreement and a high correlation (r = .986) to hand-counted values. Real-time analysis overall sensitivity, positive predictive accuracy, and false positive rate for the Aegis Medical System were (a) for isolated ventricular ectopic beats--92%, 92%, and 8%, (b) for ventricular couplets--80%, 97%, and 3%, (c) ventricular tachycardia--81%, 92%, and 8%, (d) supraventricular ectopic beats--81%, 82%, and 18%, and (e) for supraventricular tachycardia--75%, 89%, and 11%. Arrhythmia analysis was valid for mean heart rate and ventricular arrhythmias, but showed lower sensitivities in detection of low prevalence (1-60 b/Hr) ventricular couplets (72%) and ventricular tachycardia (43%). Significant inaccuracies for some densities of supraventricular arrhythmia were also found. This study found the real-time analysis ambulatory ECG similar to conventional Holter recording for technical reliability and patient applicability. Given the limitations of currently available real-time analysis ambulatory ECG systems, it is a promising technology.
为评估某一制造商的实时分析动态心电图仪(宙斯盾医疗系统公司)的技术可靠性、临床适用性及心律失常诊断准确性,164例患者通过“Y”形电缆同时接受实时分析仪和传统动态心电图记录器的检查。两种记录器的技术故障率相似(均为2%),实时分析仪适用于所有受检患者。以随机选取的799小时人工计数数据库作为真值标准,确定实时分析仪对每小时平均心率、孤立性室性早搏、室性成对早搏、室性心动过速、孤立性室上性早搏和室上性心动过速的诊断准确性。平均心率与人工计数结果的一致性为96%,且相关性较高(r = 0.986)。宙斯盾医疗系统实时分析的总体敏感性、阳性预测准确性及假阳性率分别为:(a)孤立性室性早搏——92%、92%和8%;(b)室性成对早搏——80%、97%和3%;(c)室性心动过速——81%、92%和8%;(d)室上性早搏——81%、82%和18%;(e)室上性心动过速——75%、89%和11%。心律失常分析对于平均心率和室性心律失常有效,但在检测低发生率(1 - 60次/小时)的室性成对早搏(72%)和室性心动过速(43%)时敏感性较低。对于某些室上性心律失常密度也发现有显著的诊断不准确情况。本研究发现实时分析动态心电图在技术可靠性和患者适用性方面与传统动态心电图记录相似。鉴于目前可用的实时分析动态心电图系统存在局限性,它仍是一项有前景的技术。