Tang Guixiang, Liu Jianbin, Liu Peng, Huang Feng, Shao Xunuo, Chen Yao, Xie An
Department of Radiology, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital (The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University), Changsha, China.
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Front Genet. 2022 Dec 6;13:1071025. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1071025. eCollection 2022.
This paper aims to explore whether functional liver imaging score (FLIS) based on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images at 5, 10, and 15 min can predict liver function in patients with liver cirrhosis or chronic liver disease and its association with indocyanine green 15-min retention rate (ICG-R), Child-Pugh (CP) score, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score, and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score. In addition, it also examines the inter- and intra-observer consistency of FLIS and three FLIS parameters at three different time points. This study included 110 patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) or liver cirrhosis (LC) (93 men, 17 women; mean ± standard deviation = 56.96 ± 10.16) between July 2019 and May 2022. FLIS was assigned in accordance with the sum of the three hepatobiliary phase characteristics, all of which were scored on the 0-2 ordinal scale, including the biliary excretion, hepatic enhancement and portal vein signal intensity. FLIS was calculated independently by two radiologists using transitional and hepatobiliary phase images at 5, 10, and 15 min after enhancement. The relationship between FLIS and three FLIS quality scores and the degree of liver function were evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. The ability of FLIS to predict hepatic function was investigated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Intra- and inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) (ICC = 0.937-0.978, 95% CI = 0.909-0.985) for FLIS at each time point indicated excellent agreement. At each time point, FLIS had a moderate negative association with liver function classification ( = [-0.641]-[-0.428], < 0.001), and weak to moderate correlation with some other clinical parameters except for creatinine ( > 0.05). FLIS showed moderate discriminatory ability between different liver function levels. The area under the ROC curves (AUCs) of FLIS at 5, 10, and 15 min after enhancement to predict ICG-R of 10% or less were 0.838, 0.802, and 0.723, respectively; those for predicting ICG-R greater than 20% were 0.793, 0.824, and 0.756, respectively; those for predicting ICG-R greater than 40% were 0.728, 0.755, and 0.741, respectively; those for predicting ALBI grade 1 were 0.734, 0.761, and 0.691, respectively; those for predicting CP class A cirrhosis were 0.806, 0.821, and 0.829, respectively; those for predicting MELD score of 10 or less were 0.837, 0.877, and 0.837, respectively. No significant difference was found in the AUC of FLIS at 5, 10 and 15 min ( > 0.05). FLIS presented a moderate negative correlation with the classification system of hepatic function at a delay of 5, 10, and 15 min, and patients with LC or CLD were appropriately stratified based on ICG-R, ALBI grade, MELD score, and CP classification. In addition, the use of FLIS to evaluate liver function can reduce the observation time of the hepatobiliary period.
本文旨在探讨基于钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振成像(MRI)在5分钟、10分钟和15分钟时的图像所得到的功能性肝脏成像评分(FLIS)能否预测肝硬化或慢性肝病患者的肝功能,以及其与吲哚菁绿15分钟潴留率(ICG-R)、Child-Pugh(CP)评分、白蛋白-胆红素(ALBI)评分和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分的相关性。此外,还研究了FLIS及其三个参数在三个不同时间点的观察者间和观察者内一致性。本研究纳入了2019年7月至2022年5月期间的110例慢性肝病(CLD)或肝硬化(LC)患者(93例男性,17例女性;平均±标准差=56.96±10.16)。FLIS根据三个肝胆期特征的总和进行赋值,所有特征均按0至2的顺序量表评分,包括胆汁排泄、肝脏强化和门静脉信号强度。两名放射科医生分别使用增强后5分钟、10分钟和15分钟的过渡期和肝胆期图像独立计算FLIS。使用Spearman等级相关系数评估FLIS与三个FLIS质量评分以及肝功能程度之间的关系。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线研究FLIS预测肝功能的能力。FLIS在每个时间点的观察者内和观察者间组内相关系数(ICC)(ICC = 0.937 - 0.978,95%可信区间 = 0.909 - 0.985)表明一致性良好。在每个时间点,FLIS与肝功能分级呈中度负相关( = [-0.641]-[-0.428], < 0.001),与除肌酐外的其他一些临床参数呈弱至中度相关( > 0.05)。FLIS在不同肝功能水平之间显示出中度鉴别能力。增强后5分钟、10分钟和15分钟时FLIS预测ICG-R小于或等于10%的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.838、0.802和0.723;预测ICG-R大于20%的AUC分别为0.793、0.824和0.756;预测ICG-R大于40%的AUC分别为0.728、0.755和0.741;预测ALBI 1级的AUC分别为0.734、0.761和0.691;预测CP A级肝硬化的AUC分别为0.806、0.821和0.829;预测MELD评分小于或等于10的AUC分别为0.837、0.877和0.837。5分钟、10分钟和15分钟时FLIS的AUC未发现显著差异( > 0.05)。在延迟至5分钟、10分钟和15分钟时,FLIS与肝功能分类系统呈中度负相关,并且根据ICG-R、ALBI分级、MELD评分和CP分类对LC或CLD患者进行了适当分层。此外,使用FLIS评估肝功能可以减少肝胆期的观察时间。