• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Design and Rationale of Routine ltrasoud Gudance for ascular Accss fo Cardiac Procedure: Randomized Tria (UNIVERSAL).心脏手术血管通路常规超声引导的设计与原理:随机试验(通用试验)
CJC Open. 2022 Aug 30;4(12):1074-1080. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2022.08.011. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Routine Ultrasonography Guidance for Femoral Vascular Access for Cardiac Procedures: The UNIVERSAL Randomized Clinical Trial.常规超声引导在心脏介入手术中的股动脉血管入路应用:UNIVERSAL 随机临床试验
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Nov 1;7(11):1110-1118. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.3399.
3
Intravascular ultrasound to guide percutaneous coronary interventions: an evidence-based analysis.血管内超声引导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(12):1-97. Epub 2006 Apr 1.
4
Ultrasound-guided femoral access in patients with vascular closure devices: a prespecified analysis of the randomised UNIVERSAL trial.超声引导下使用血管闭合装置的股动脉入路:随机 UNIVERSAL 试验的预设分析。
EuroIntervention. 2023 May 15;19(1):73-79. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-01130.
5
Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmark approach for femoral artery access in coronary angiography: A randomized controlled trial and a meta-analysis.冠状动脉造影中股动脉穿刺的超声引导与解剖标志法:一项随机对照试验和荟萃分析
J Interv Cardiol. 2018 Aug;31(4):496-503. doi: 10.1111/joic.12492. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
6
A registry-based randomized trial comparing radial and femoral approaches in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the SAFE-PCI for Women (Study of Access Site for Enhancement of PCI for Women) trial.一项基于注册的随机临床试验比较了女性行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时桡动脉和股动脉入路:SAFE-PCI for Women(女性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗入路增强研究)试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(8):857-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.04.007.
7
Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中桡动脉与股动脉入路的随机多中心试验。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2465-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
8
Radial Versus Femoral Approach in Women Undergoing Coronary Angiography: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.接受冠状动脉造影的女性患者中桡动脉与股动脉入路:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Nov;31(11):335-340. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
9
Ultrasound-Guided Transfemoral Access for Coronary Procedures: A Pooled Learning Curve Analysis From the FAUST and UNIVERSAL Trials.超声引导经股动脉入路行冠状动脉介入治疗的学习曲线分析:FAUST 和 UNIVERSAL 试验的汇总分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Aug;17(8):e013817. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013817. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
10
Ultrasound Guidance in Femoral Artery Catheterization: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.股动脉插管中的超声引导:一项系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Jul;31(7):E192-E198.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasound-guided femoral access in patients with vascular closure devices: a prespecified analysis of the randomised UNIVERSAL trial.超声引导下使用血管闭合装置的股动脉入路:随机 UNIVERSAL 试验的预设分析。
EuroIntervention. 2023 May 15;19(1):73-79. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-22-01130.
2
Routine Ultrasonography Guidance for Femoral Vascular Access for Cardiac Procedures: The UNIVERSAL Randomized Clinical Trial.常规超声引导在心脏介入手术中的股动脉血管入路应用:UNIVERSAL 随机临床试验
JAMA Cardiol. 2022 Nov 1;7(11):1110-1118. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.3399.

本文引用的文献

1
2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2021 年 ACC/AHA/SCAI 冠状动脉血运重建指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jan 18;79(2):197-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.005. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
2
Evidence-Based Practices in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.心脏导管实验室中的循证实践:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2021 Aug 3;144(5):e107-e119. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000996. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
3
SCAI expert consensus update on best practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: This statement was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) in April 2021.SCAI 专家共识更新:心脏导管实验室最佳实践——该声明于 2021 年 4 月由美国心脏病学会(ACC)、美国心脏协会(AHA)和心律学会(HRS)共同认可。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Aug 1;98(2):255-276. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29744. Epub 2021 May 19.
4
The Learning Curves for Transradial and Ultrasound-Guided Arterial Access: An Analysis of the SURF Trial.经桡动脉与超声引导动脉入路学习曲线:SURF 试验分析。
Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Sep;30(9):1329-1336. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
5
Radial versus femoral access for coronary interventions: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.经桡动脉与股动脉入路行冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:一项更新的随机临床试验系统评价和荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jun 1;97(7):1387-1396. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29486. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
6
Standard Versus Ultrasound-Guided Cannulation of the Femoral Artery in Patients Undergoing Invasive Procedures: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.侵入性操作患者股动脉置管:标准置管与超声引导下置管的对比——一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 3;9(3):677. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030677.
7
A prospective, randomized study comparing ultrasound versus fluoroscopic guided femoral arterial access in noncardiac vascular patients.一项前瞻性、随机研究比较了非心脏血管患者中超声与透视引导下股动脉入路的效果。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Jul;72(1):259-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.09.051. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
8
Ultrasound Guidance in Femoral Artery Catheterization: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.股动脉插管中的超声引导:一项系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Jul;31(7):E192-E198.
9
Standard versus ultrasound-guided radial and femoral access in coronary angiography and intervention (SURF): a randomised controlled trial.标准桡动脉与超声引导股动脉入路在冠状动脉造影及介入治疗中的比较(SURF):一项随机对照试验。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Aug 9;15(6):e522-e530. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00336.
10
'Ten commandments' for the 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization.2018年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会心肌血运重建指南的“十诫”
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):79-80. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy855.

心脏手术血管通路常规超声引导的设计与原理:随机试验(通用试验)

Design and Rationale of Routine ltrasoud Gudance for ascular Accss fo Cardiac Procedure: Randomized Tria (UNIVERSAL).

作者信息

Alrashidi Sulaiman, d'Entremont Marc-André, Alansari Omar, Winter Jose, Brochu Bradley, Heenan Laura, Skuriat Elizabeth, Tyrwhitt Jessica, Raco Michael, Tsang Michael B, Valettas Nicholas, Velianou James, Sheth Tej, Sibbald Matthew, Mehta Shamir R, Pinilla-Echeverri Natalia, Schwalm Jon David, Natarajan Madhu K, Kelly Andrew, Akl Elie, Tawadros Sarah, Camargo Mercedes, Faidi Walaa, Dutra Gustavo, Jolly Sanjit S

机构信息

McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

CJC Open. 2022 Aug 30;4(12):1074-1080. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2022.08.011. eCollection 2022 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.cjco.2022.08.011
PMID:36562014
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9764117/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A significant limitation of femoral artery access for cardiac interventions is the increased risk of vascular complications and bleeding compared to radial access. Ultrasound (US)-guided femoral access may reduce major vascular complications and bleeding. We aim to determine whether routinely using US guidance for femoral arterial access for coronary angiography or intervention will reduce leeding cademic esearch onsortium (BARC) 2, 3, or 5 bleeding or major vascular complications.

METHODS

The ltrasoud Gudance for ascular Accss fo Cardiac Procedure: Randomized Tria (UNIVERSAL) is a multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomized trial with blinded outcomes assessment. Patients undergoing coronary angiography with or without intervention via a femoral approach with fluoroscopic guidance will be randomized 1:1 to US-guided femoral access, compared to no US. The primary outcome is the composite of major bleeding based on the BARC 2, 3, or 5 criteria or major vascular complications within 30 days. The trial is designed to have 80% power and a 2-sided alpha level of 5% to detect a 50% relative risk reduction for the primary outcome based on a control event rate of 14%.

RESULTS

We completed enrollment on April 29, 2022, with 621 randomized patients. The patients had a mean age of 71 years (25.4% female), with a high rate of comorbidities, as follows: 45% had a prior percutaneous coronary intervention; 57% had previous coronary artery bypass surgery; and 18% had peripheral vascular disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The UNIVERSAL trial will be one of the largest randomized trials of US-guided femoral access and has the potential to change guidelines and increase US uptake for coronary procedures worldwide.

摘要

背景

与桡动脉入路相比,心脏介入治疗中股动脉入路的一个显著局限性是血管并发症和出血风险增加。超声(US)引导下的股动脉入路可能会减少主要血管并发症和出血。我们旨在确定在冠状动脉造影或介入治疗中常规使用US引导股动脉入路是否会减少学术研究联盟(BARC)2、3或5级出血或主要血管并发症。

方法

心脏手术血管入路的超声引导:随机试验(UNIVERSAL)是一项多中心、前瞻性、开放标签、结局评估设盲的随机试验。在透视引导下经股动脉途径进行冠状动脉造影(无论是否进行介入治疗)的患者将按1:1随机分为US引导股动脉入路组和无US引导组。主要结局是基于BARC 2、3或5标准的主要出血或30天内的主要血管并发症的复合情况。该试验设计的检验效能为80%,双侧α水平为5%,以基于14%的对照事件发生率检测主要结局相对风险降低50%。

结果

我们于2022年4月29日完成入组,共有621例随机分组患者。患者的平均年龄为71岁(25.4%为女性),合并症发生率较高,具体如下:45%曾接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗;57%曾接受冠状动脉旁路移植术;18%患有外周血管疾病。

结论

UNIVERSAL试验将是最大规模的US引导股动脉入路随机试验之一,有可能改变指南并增加全球冠状动脉手术中US的应用率。