Kim Ji Hwan, Kim Yong Kyun, Oh Dong Kyu, Jeon Kyeongman, Ko Ryoung-Eun, Suh Gee Young, Lim Sung Yun, Lee Yeon Joo, Cho Young-Jae, Park Mi-Hyeon, Hong Sang-Bum, Lim Chae-Man, Park Sunghoon
Department of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
Department of Infection, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
Shock. 2023 Mar 1;59(3):360-367. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002067. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
Background and Objective: Although sepsis is heterogeneous, data on sepsis patients with normal lactate levels are very limited. We explored whether hypotension at the time of sepsis recognition (i.e., time zero) was significant in terms of survival when lactate levels were normal in sepsis patients. Patients and Design: This was a prospective multicenter observational study conducted in 19 hospitals (20 intensive care units [ICUs]). Adult sepsis patients with normal lactate levels (≤2 mmol/L) admitted to ICUs were divided by the mean arterial pressure at time zero into hypotensive (<65 mm Hg) and nonhypotensive groups (≥65 mm Hg). Measurements and Results: Of 2,032 patients with sepsis (not septic shock), 617 with normal lactate levels were included in the analysis. The hypotensive group (n = 237) was characterized by higher rates of abdominal or urinary infections, and bacteremia, whereas the nonhypotensive group (n = 380) was characterized by higher rates of pulmonary infections and systemic inflammatory response. However, the Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (excluding the cardiovascular score) were not different between the groups. During sepsis resuscitation, the rates of antibiotic administration within 1, 3, and 6 h of time zero were higher in the hypotensive than nonhypotensive group ( P < 0.05 for all time points), and the amounts of pre-ICU fluids given were also higher in the hypotensive group. However, despite a higher rate of vasopressor use in the hypotensive group, ICU and in-hospital mortality rates were not different between the groups (12.7% vs. 13.9% [ P = 0.648] and 19.4% vs. 22.4% [ P = 0.382], respectively). In multivariable analysis, the use of appropriate antibiotics and early lactate measurement were significant risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Conclusions: In sepsis patients with normal lactate levels, neither hypotension nor vasopressor use adversely impacted the hospital outcome. Our results emphasize the importance of early interventions and appropriate use of antibiotics regardless of whether a patient is or is not hypotensive.
尽管脓毒症具有异质性,但关于乳酸水平正常的脓毒症患者的数据非常有限。我们探讨了在脓毒症患者乳酸水平正常时,脓毒症识别时(即时间零点)的低血压对生存是否具有显著意义。
这是一项在19家医院(20个重症监护病房[ICU])进行的前瞻性多中心观察性研究。入住ICU的乳酸水平正常(≤2 mmol/L)的成年脓毒症患者按时间零点的平均动脉压分为低血压组(<65 mmHg)和非低血压组(≥65 mmHg)。
在2032例脓毒症(非脓毒症休克)患者中,617例乳酸水平正常的患者纳入分析。低血压组(n = 237)的特点是腹部或泌尿系统感染以及菌血症发生率较高,而非低血压组(n = 380)的特点是肺部感染和全身炎症反应发生率较高。然而,两组之间的简化急性生理学评分3和序贯器官衰竭评估评分(不包括心血管评分)并无差异。在脓毒症复苏期间,低血压组在时间零点后1、3和6小时内使用抗生素的比例高于非低血压组(所有时间点P < 0.05),低血压组给予的ICU前液体量也更高。然而,尽管低血压组使用血管升压药的比例较高,但两组的ICU死亡率和住院死亡率并无差异(分别为12.7%对13.9%[P = 0.648]和19.4%对22.4%[P = 0.382])。在多变量分析中,使用适当的抗生素和早期测量乳酸是住院死亡率的显著危险因素。
在乳酸水平正常的脓毒症患者中,低血压和使用血管升压药均未对医院结局产生不利影响。我们的结果强调了早期干预和适当使用抗生素的重要性,无论患者是否低血压。