Suppr超能文献

用于治疗羊膜腔内感染的抗生素治疗方案。

Antibiotic regimens for management of intra-amniotic infection.

作者信息

Chapman Evelina, Reveiz Ludovic, Illanes Eduardo, Bonfill Cosp Xavier

机构信息

Free time independent Cochrane reviewer, Tucumàn, Argentina.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 19;2014(12):CD010976. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010976.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chorioamnionitis is a common infection that affects both mother and infant. Infant complications associated with chorioamnionitis include early neonatal sepsis, pneumonia, and meningitis. Chorioamnionitis can also result in maternal morbidity such as pelvic infection and septic shock.Clinical chorioamnionitis is estimated to occur in 1% to 2% of term births and in 5% to 10% of preterm births; histologic chorioamnionitis is found in nearly 20% of term births and in 50% of preterm births. Women with chorioamnionitis have a two to three times higher risk for cesarean delivery and a three to four times greater risk for endomyometritis, wound infection, pelvic abscess, bacteremia, and postpartum hemorrhage.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of administering antibiotic regimens for intra-amniotic infection on maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality and on infection-related complications.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (1 October 2014), CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, and the WHO ICTRP (September 2014). We also searched reference lists of retrieved studies and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that included women who experienced intra-amniotic infection. Trials were included if they compared antibiotic treatment with placebo or no treatment (if applicable), treatment with different antibiotic regimens, or timing of antibiotic therapy (intrapartum and/or postpartum). Therefore, this review assesses trials evaluating intrapartum antibiotics, intrapartum and postpartum antibiotic regimens, and postpartum antibiotics. Diagnosis of intra-amniotic infection was based on standard criteria (clinical/test), and no limit was placed on gestational age.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and trial quality. Two review authors independently extracted data and checked them for accuracy. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and included a 'Summary of findings' table.

MAIN RESULTS

Our prespecified primary outcomes were maternal and neonatal mortality, maternal and neonatal severe infection, and duration of maternal and neonatal hospital stay.We included 11 studies (involving 1296 women) and assessed them as having low to moderate risk of bias - mainly because allocation concealment methods were not adequately reported, most studies were open, and outcome reporting was incomplete. The quality of the evidence was low to very low for most outcomes, as per the GRADE approach. The following antibiotics were assessed in the included trials: ampicillin, ampicillin/sulbactam, gentamicin, clindamycin, and cefotetan. During labor: meta-analysis of two studies found no clear differences in rates of neonatal sepsis (163 neonates; risk ratio (RR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40 to 2.86; I² = 9%; low quality of evidence), treatment failure (endometritis) (163 participants; RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.27 to 2.70; I² = 0%; low quality of evidence), and postpartum hemorrhage (RR 1.39, 95% CI 0.76 to 2.56; I² = 0%; low quality of evidence) when two different dosages/regimens of gentamicin were assessed. No clear differences between groups were found for any reported maternal or neonatal outcomes. The review did not identify data for a comparison of antibiotics versus no treatment/placebo. Postpartum: meta-analysis of two studies that evaluated use of antibiotics versus placebo after vaginal delivery showed no significant differences between groups in rates of treatment failure or postpartum endometritis. No significant differences were found in rates of neonatal death and postpartum endometritis when use of antibiotics was compared with no treatment. Four trials assessing two different dosages/regimens of gentamicin or dual-agent therapy versus triple-agent therapy, or comparing antibiotics, found no significant differences in most reported neonatal or maternal outcomes; the duration of hospital stay showed a difference in favor of the group of women who received short-duration antibiotics (one study, 292 women; mean difference (MD) -0.90 days, 95% CI -1.64 to -0.16; moderate quality of evidence). Intrapartum versus postpartum: one small study (45 women) evaluating use of ampicillin/gentamicin during intrapartum versus immediate postpartum treatment found significant differences favoring the intrapartum group in the mean number of days of maternal postpartum hospital stay (one trial, 45 women; MD -1.00 days, 95% CI -1.94 to - 0.06; very low quality of evidence) and the mean number of neonatal hospital stay days (one trial, 45 neonates; MD -1.90 days, 95% CI -3.91 to -0.49; very low quality of evidence). Although no significant differences were found in the rate of maternal bacteremia or early neonatal sepsis, for the outcome of neonatal pneumonia or sepsis we observed a significant difference favoring intrapartum treatment (one trial, 45 neonates; RR 0.06, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.95; very low quality of evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review included 11 studies (having low to moderate risk of bias). The quality of the evidence was low to very low for most outcomes, as per the GRADE approach. Only one outcome (duration of hospital stay) was considered to provide moderate quality of evidence when antibiotics (short duration) were compared with antibiotics (long duration) during postpartum management of intra-amniotic infection. Our main reasons for downgrading the quality of evidence were limitations in study design or execution (risk of bias), imprecision, and inconsistency of results.Currently, limited evidence is available to reveal the most appropriate antimicrobial regimen for the treatment of patients with intra-amniotic infection; whether antibiotics should be continued during the postpartum period; and which antibiotic regimen or what treatment duration should be used. Also, no evidence was found on adverse effects of the intervention (not reported in any of the included studies). One small RCT showed that use of antibiotics during the intrapartum period is superior to their use during the postpartum period in reducing the number of days of maternal and neonatal hospital stay.

摘要

背景

绒毛膜羊膜炎是一种常见感染,会影响母亲和婴儿。与绒毛膜羊膜炎相关的婴儿并发症包括早发性新生儿败血症、肺炎和脑膜炎。绒毛膜羊膜炎还会导致母亲发病,如盆腔感染和感染性休克。据估计,临床绒毛膜羊膜炎在足月分娩中发生率为1%至2%,在早产中发生率为5%至10%;组织学绒毛膜羊膜炎在近20%的足月分娩和50%的早产中被发现。患有绒毛膜羊膜炎的女性剖宫产风险高出两到三倍,发生子宫内膜炎、伤口感染、盆腔脓肿、菌血症和产后出血的风险高出三到四倍。

目的

评估羊膜腔内感染抗生素治疗方案对孕产妇和围产儿发病率、死亡率以及感染相关并发症的影响。

检索方法

我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2014年10月1日)、Cochrane系统评价数据库、MEDLINE、Embase、LILACS和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(2014年9月)。我们还检索了检索到的研究的参考文献列表,并联系了该领域的专家。

入选标准

纳入经历羊膜腔内感染女性的随机对照试验(RCT)。如果试验比较了抗生素治疗与安慰剂或不治疗(如适用)、不同抗生素治疗方案或抗生素治疗时机(产时和/或产后),则纳入试验。因此,本综述评估了评估产时抗生素、产时和产后抗生素治疗方案以及产后抗生素的试验。羊膜腔内感染的诊断基于标准标准(临床/检查),对孕周没有限制。

数据收集与分析

两位综述作者独立评估试验是否纳入以及试验质量。两位综述作者独立提取数据并检查其准确性。我们使用推荐分级、评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法评估证据质量,并纳入了“结果总结”表。

主要结果

我们预先设定的主要结局是孕产妇和新生儿死亡率、孕产妇和新生儿严重感染以及孕产妇和新生儿住院时间。我们纳入了11项研究(涉及1296名女性),并将其评估为具有低至中度偏倚风险——主要是因为分配隐藏方法报告不充分,大多数研究为开放性研究,结局报告不完整。根据GRADE方法,大多数结局的证据质量为低至极低。纳入试验中评估的抗生素如下:氨苄西林、氨苄西林/舒巴坦、庆大霉素、克林霉素和头孢替坦。分娩期间:两项研究的荟萃分析发现,在评估两种不同剂量/方案的庆大霉素时,新生儿败血症发生率(163名新生儿;风险比(RR)1.07,95%置信区间(CI)0.40至2.86;I² = 9%;低质量证据)、治疗失败(子宫内膜炎)发生率(163名参与者;RR 0.86,95%CI 0.27至2.70;I² = 0%;低质量证据)和产后出血发生率(RR 1.39,95%CI 0.76至2.56;I² = 0%;低质量证据)无明显差异。在任何报告的孕产妇或新生儿结局方面,各治疗组之间均未发现明显差异。本综述未找到抗生素与不治疗/安慰剂比较的数据。产后:两项评估阴道分娩后抗生素与安慰剂使用的研究的荟萃分析表明,治疗失败率或产后子宫内膜炎发生率在两组之间无显著差异。在比较抗生素使用与不治疗时,新生儿死亡率和产后子宫内膜炎发生率无显著差异。四项评估两种不同剂量/方案的庆大霉素或双联疗法与三联疗法,或比较抗生素的试验发现,在大多数报告的新生儿或孕产妇结局方面无显著差异;住院时间在接受短期抗生素治疗的女性组中显示出差异(一项研究,292名女性;平均差(MD)-0.90天,95%CI -1.64至-0.16;中等质量证据)。产时与产后:一项小型研究(45名女性)评估了产时使用氨苄西林/庆大霉素与产后立即治疗,结果发现,在孕产妇产后住院天数的平均值方面,产时治疗组具有显著优势(一项试验,45名女性;MD -1.00天,95%CI -1.94至-0.06;极低质量证据),在新生儿住院天数的平均值方面也具有显著优势(一项试验,45名新生儿;MD -1.90天,95%CI -3.91至-0.49;极低质量证据)。尽管在孕产妇菌血症或早发性新生儿败血症发生率方面未发现显著差异,但在新生儿肺炎或败血症结局方面,我们观察到产时治疗具有显著优势(一项试验,45名新生儿;RR 0.06,95%CI 0.00至0.95;极低质量证据)。

作者结论

本综述纳入了11项研究(具有低至中度偏倚风险)。根据GRADE方法,大多数结局的证据质量为低至极低。在羊膜腔内感染产后管理中,只有一个结局(住院时间)在比较抗生素(短期)与抗生素(长期)时被认为提供了中等质量的证据。我们降低证据质量的主要原因是研究设计或实施存在局限性(偏倚风险)、不精确性以及结果的不一致性。目前,揭示治疗羊膜腔内感染患者最合适的抗菌治疗方案、产后是否应继续使用抗生素以及应使用哪种抗生素治疗方案或治疗持续时间的证据有限。此外,未发现关于干预措施不良反应的证据(纳入的任何研究均未报告)。一项小型随机对照试验表明,产时使用抗生素在减少孕产妇和新生儿住院天数方面优于产后使用抗生素。

相似文献

1
Antibiotic regimens for management of intra-amniotic infection.用于治疗羊膜腔内感染的抗生素治疗方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 19;2014(12):CD010976. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010976.pub2.
2
Amnioinfusion for chorioamnionitis.羊膜腔灌注治疗绒毛膜羊膜炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 24;2016(8):CD011622. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011622.pub2.
7
Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes.分娩早期的评估与支持以改善分娩结局
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 20;4(4):CD011516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011516.pub2.
9
Cell salvage for the management of postpartum haemorrhage.采用细胞回收技术管理产后出血。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):CD016120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016120.
10
Sealing procedures for preterm prelabour rupture of membranes.早产胎膜早破的封闭治疗程序
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 7;7(7):CD010218. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010218.pub2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Antibiotics for preterm rupture of membranes.用于胎膜早破的抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 2;2013(12):CD001058. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001058.pub3.
6
Evidence for the clinical management of chorioamnionitis.针对绒毛膜羊膜炎的临床管理证据。
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Feb;17(1):46-50. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2011.09.002. Epub 2011 Oct 1.
7
Chorioamnionitis: from pathogenesis to treatment.绒毛膜羊膜炎:从发病机制到治疗。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Sep;17(9):1304-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03574.x. Epub 2011 Jun 14.
9
Diagnosis and management of clinical chorioamnionitis.临床绒毛膜羊膜炎的诊断与处理。
Clin Perinatol. 2010 Jun;37(2):339-54. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2010.02.003.
10
Effect of chorioamnionitis on early childhood asthma.绒毛膜羊膜炎对儿童早期哮喘的影响。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 Feb;164(2):187-92. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.238.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验