School of Criminal Justice, Faculty of Law, Criminal Justice and Public Administration, University of Lausanne, Batochime, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Fondation pour la Formation Continue Universitaire Lausannoise (UNIL-EPFL) & School of Criminal Justice, Batochime, Dorigny, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; Forensic Genetics Unit, University Center of Legal Medicine, Lausanne-Geneva, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne 100025, Switzerland.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2023 Mar;63:102823. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102823. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
Several studies have demonstrated that DNA can be indirectly transferred from an individual onto a surface. Therefore, the presence of DNA that is compatible with a given person does not necessarily mean that this person has touched the surface on which the DNA was recovered. The present work simulates cases, where DNA is recovered on a door handle and compared to several reference DNA profiles. The DNA profile of the trace shares DNA components with a person of interest (POI). When asked about the DNA results, the POI says he has nothing to do with the incident and has never been at the scene. However, a possibility would be that the DNA came from his recently stolen gloves. Someone else, the alternative offender (AO), could have opened the door wearing his gloves (POI's gloves), and transferred his DNA (POI's DNA). Based on the above-mentioned scenario, 60 burglary simulations experiments were carried out to generate data to assess DNA results given these allegations. The quantity and quality of DNA profiles (NGM SElect) recovered when the POI opened/closed the door bare-handed or when someone else performed the same activity but using POI's gloves, were compared. The gloves were regularly worn during at least three months by their owner during the winter. On the contrary, the AO wore them only for two minutes. Among the traces collected on the door handles, less than 50% of the traces led to interpretable DNA profiles. In 30% of the cases (3/10), when the door was opened/closed with bare hands, the DNA found on the door handle led to a mixed DNA profile with the POI's DNA aligning with the major contributor. For the experiments where the AO opened/closed the door with the POI's gloves, the POI's DNA was compatible with 22% (11/50) of the mixed DNA profile, aligning with the major in 8% of the cases (4/50). The DNA profiles of the offices' occupants were observed on the door handles, but not the AO's. In addition to the results of the experiments, we show two examples of how one can assess results observed in casework. Given the possibility of indirect transfer of minute DNA quantities, this research emphasizes the need to evaluate DNA results given the activities when the POI has a legitimate reason that can explain the presence of their DNA.
已有多项研究表明,DNA 可以从一个人身上间接转移到一个表面上。因此,在某个表面上发现与某个人相匹配的 DNA 并不一定意味着这个人接触过这个表面。本研究模拟了在门把手上回收 DNA 的情况,并将其与几个参考 DNA 图谱进行了比较。痕量 DNA 图谱与感兴趣的个体(POI)共享 DNA 成分。当被问及 DNA 结果时,POI 说他与该事件无关,从未到过现场。然而,有一种可能性是,DNA 来自他最近被盗的手套。另一个人,即替代犯罪人(AO),可能戴着他的手套打开了门(POI 的手套),并转移了他的 DNA(POI 的 DNA)。基于上述情况,进行了 60 次盗窃模拟实验,以生成数据来评估在这些指控下的 DNA 结果。比较了当 POI 赤手空拳打开/关闭门或当其他人执行相同的活动但使用 POI 的手套时,回收的 DNA 图谱的数量和质量。这些手套在冬季至少有三个月是由它们的主人定期佩戴的。相反,AO 只戴了两分钟。在所收集的门把手上的痕迹中,不到 50%的痕迹导致可解释的 DNA 图谱。在 30%的情况下(3/10),当门被赤手空拳打开/关闭时,在门把手上发现的 DNA 导致了混合 DNA 图谱,POI 的 DNA 与主要贡献者相匹配。对于 AO 用 POI 的手套打开/关闭门的实验,POI 的 DNA 与混合 DNA 图谱中的 22%(11/50)相匹配,在 8%的情况下(4/50)与主要相匹配。办公室工作人员的 DNA 图谱在门把手上被观察到,但 AO 的没有。除了实验结果外,我们还展示了两个案例,说明了如何评估案件中观察到的结果。鉴于微量 DNA 数量的间接转移的可能性,本研究强调需要根据 POI 有合理理由可以解释其 DNA 存在的活动来评估 DNA 结果。