• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同固定方法对颈椎椎体置换融合生物力学性能的影响

Effect of different fixation methods on biomechanical property of cervical vertebral body replacement and fusion.

作者信息

Zhang Dong-Xiang, Guo Li-Xin

机构信息

School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China.

School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China.

出版信息

Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2023 Jan;101:105864. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105864. Epub 2022 Dec 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105864
PMID:36563544
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The main purpose of this study was to examine the effect of different fixation methods (anterior fixation, self-stabilizing fixation and anterior-posterior fixation) on biomechanical property of vertebral body replacement and fusion.

METHODS

Three finite element models of cervical vertebral body replacement and fusion were established. The implanted models included artificial vertebral body and fixation system, and the loads imposed on the models included 75 N compression load and 1 Nm moment load.

FINDINGS

For anterior-posterior fixation, the cervical load was mainly transmitted by the posterior pedicle screw and rod (more than 50%), and the stress shielding problem was the most significant than the self-stabilizing and anterior fixation. Self-stabilizing fixation was more helpful to the fusion of implant and vertebrae, but the higher risk of vertebral body collapse was worthy of attention if the cervical spine with osteoporosis. The stress of bone was mainly concentrated around the screw hole. The maximum stress (20.03 MPa) was lower than the yield stress of cortical bone and the possibility of fracture around the fixation device of cervical spine was low. The anterior fixation could meet the requirement of vertebral body replacement and fusion, and the addition of posterior pedicle screws and rods might obtain better treatment in cases of severe spine injury or osteoporosis.

INTERPRETATION

The findings of this study may provide guidance on clinical treatments for choosing more appropriate fixation methods for different patients.

摘要

背景

本研究的主要目的是探讨不同固定方法(前路固定、自稳定固定和前后路固定)对椎体置换与融合生物力学性能的影响。

方法

建立了三个颈椎椎体置换与融合的有限元模型。植入模型包括人工椎体和固定系统,施加在模型上的载荷包括75N压缩载荷和1Nm弯矩载荷。

结果

对于前后路固定,颈椎载荷主要通过后路椎弓根螺钉和棒传递(超过50%),应力遮挡问题比自稳定固定和前路固定更为显著。自稳定固定对植入物与椎体的融合更有帮助,但对于骨质疏松的颈椎,椎体塌陷风险较高值得关注。骨应力主要集中在螺钉孔周围。最大应力(20.03MPa)低于皮质骨的屈服应力,颈椎固定装置周围骨折的可能性较低。前路固定可满足椎体置换与融合的要求,对于严重脊柱损伤或骨质疏松病例,增加后路椎弓根螺钉和棒可能获得更好的治疗效果。

解读

本研究结果可为临床治疗中针对不同患者选择更合适的固定方法提供指导。

相似文献

1
Effect of different fixation methods on biomechanical property of cervical vertebral body replacement and fusion.不同固定方法对颈椎椎体置换融合生物力学性能的影响
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2023 Jan;101:105864. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105864. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
2
A biomechanical analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion alone or combined cervical fixations in treating compression-extension injury with unilateral facet joint fracture: a finite element study.单纯前路颈椎间盘切除融合术与联合颈椎固定术治疗单侧关节突骨折伴压缩-伸展损伤的生物力学分析:有限元研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Nov 10;22(1):938. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04814-4.
3
Biomechanical analysis on of anterior transpedicular screw-fixation after two-level cervical corpectomy using finite element method.基于有限元法的两级颈椎椎体次全切除术后前路经椎弓根螺钉内固定的生物力学分析
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2018 Dec;60:76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
4
Biomechanical comparison of cervical discectomy/fusion model using allograft spacers between anterior and posterior fixation methods (lateral mass and pedicle screw).前路和后路固定方法(侧块和椎弓根螺钉)之间使用同种异体骨间隔器行颈椎间盘切除/融合模型的生物力学比较。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2020 Mar;73:226-233. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.01.018. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
5
The effect of screw tunnels on the biomechanical stability of vertebral body after pedicle screws removal: a finite element analysis.椎弓根螺钉取出后螺钉通道对椎体生物力学稳定性的影响:有限元分析
Int Orthop. 2017 Jun;41(6):1183-1187. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3453-y. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
6
A biomechanical comparison of three different posterior fixation constructs used for c6-c7 cervical spine immobilization: a finite element study.用于C6-C7颈椎固定的三种不同后路固定结构的生物力学比较:一项有限元研究。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2014;54(9):727-35. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2013-0004. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
7
Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures by short-segment pedicle screw fixation using a combination of two additional pedicle screws and vertebroplasty at the level of the fracture: a finite element analysis.采用两枚附加椎弓根螺钉联合骨折节段椎体成形术的短节段椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折:有限元分析
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jun 15;18(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1623-0.
8
Biomechanical characterization of vertebral body replacement in situ: Effects of different fixation strategies.原位椎体置换的生物力学特性:不同固定策略的影响
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Dec;197:105741. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105741. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
9
Does pedicle screw fixation of the subaxial cervical spine provide adequate stabilization in a multilevel vertebral body fracture model? An in vitro biomechanical study.下颈椎椎弓根螺钉固定在多节段椎体骨折模型中能否提供足够的稳定性?一项体外生物力学研究。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2018 Mar;53:72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
10
Effect of endplate conditions and bone mineral density on the compressive strength of the graft-endplate interface in anterior cervical spine fusion.终板条件和骨密度对颈椎前路融合术中移植物-终板界面抗压强度的影响。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Apr 15;26(8):951-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200104150-00021.

引用本文的文献

1
Destruction mechanism of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in frontal impact.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术在正面撞击中的破坏机制
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2024 Dec;62(12):3855-3873. doi: 10.1007/s11517-024-03167-z. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
2
Numerical evaluation of spinal reconstruction using a 3D printed vertebral body replacement implant: effects of material anisotropy.使用3D打印椎体置换植入物对脊柱重建进行数值评估:材料各向异性的影响。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Jun 20;12:1305837. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1305837. eCollection 2024.
3
A novel artificial vertebral implant with Gyroid porous structures for reducing the subsidence and mechanical failure rate after vertebral body replacement.
一种具有 Gyroid 多孔结构的新型人工椎体植入物,用于降低椎体置换术后的沉降率和机械失败率。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Nov 3;18(1):828. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04310-6.