Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Fertil Steril. 2023 Apr;119(4):644-652. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.12.028. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
To evaluate the association between breastfeeding history, including lifetime exclusive breastfeeding, and risk of adenomyosis.
We used data from a case-control study designed with 2 control groups to address the challenge of selecting noncases for a valid epidemiologic study when cases are identified by hysterectomy. The case-control study was conducted among premenopausal and postmenopausal enrollees aged 18-59 years in a large, integrated health care system in western Washington state.
PATIENT(S): Cases were enrollees with incident, pathology-confirmed adenomyosis diagnosed during 2001-2006 (n = 386). The 2 control groups were as follows: (1) randomly selected age-matched enrollees with intact uteri ("population controls," n = 323) and (2) hysterectomy controls (n = 233).
INTERVENTION(S): Data on breastfeeding history were collected by in-person interviews. For each reported live birth, participants were asked whether they breastfed, along with infant age at supplemental feeding introduction and breastfeeding discontinuation.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Among participants with at least 1 live birth (330 cases, 246 population controls, and 198 hysterectomy controls), we used unconditional logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations between the following: (1) ever breastfeeding, (2) ever breastfeeding for ≥8 weeks, (3) lifetime breastfeeding, and (4) lifetime exclusive breastfeeding and risk of adenomyosis. Analyses were adjusted for age, reference year, smoking, education, and parity.
RESULT(S): In analyses comparing cases with population controls, we observed a 40% decreased odds of adenomyosis with a history of ever breastfeeding (adjusted odds ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.3-1.0) and breastfeeding for ≥8 weeks (adjusted odds ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.8). The strongest associations, 60%-70% decreased odds of adenomyosis, were observed with ≥12 months of lifetime breastfeeding (vs. <3 months) (adjusted odds ratio, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6) and 9 to <12 months of lifetime exclusive breastfeeding (vs. <3 months) (adjusted odds ratio, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6), comparing cases to population controls. In analyses using hysterectomy controls, we observed similar patterns of associations slightly attenuated in magnitude.
CONCLUSION(S): Breastfeeding history was associated with a 40% decreased odds of adenomyosis, a condition that can confer substantial morbidity and requires hysterectomy for definitive treatment. The consistency of our findings with that of a previous study lends support that breastfeeding may modify risk of adenomyosis.
评估母乳喂养史(包括终生纯母乳喂养)与子宫腺肌病风险之间的关联。
我们使用了一项病例对照研究的数据,该研究设计了 2 个对照组,以解决当病例通过子宫切除术确定时为有效进行流行病学研究选择非病例的挑战。该病例对照研究在华盛顿州西部一个大型综合医疗保健系统中,对 18-59 岁的绝经前和绝经后参保者进行。
病例为在 2001-2006 年间确诊的、经病理证实的腺肌病新发病例(n=386)。2 个对照组如下:(1)随机选择的、子宫完整的年龄匹配参保者(人群对照组,n=323)和(2)子宫切除术对照组(n=233)。
通过面对面访谈收集母乳喂养史数据。对于每一次活产,参与者被问及他们是否母乳喂养,以及婴儿开始补充喂养和停止母乳喂养的年龄。
在至少有 1 次活产的参与者中(330 例病例、246 例人群对照组和 198 例子宫切除术对照组),我们使用非条件逻辑回归估计了以下因素与子宫腺肌病风险之间的调整后比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI):(1)曾母乳喂养,(2)曾母乳喂养≥8 周,(3)终生母乳喂养,和(4)终生纯母乳喂养。分析调整了年龄、参考年份、吸烟、教育程度和产次。
在病例与人群对照组的比较分析中,我们观察到有母乳喂养史的患者患子宫腺肌病的风险降低了 40%(调整后的 OR,0.6;95%CI,0.3-1.0),母乳喂养≥8 周的患者患子宫腺肌病的风险降低了 60%(调整后的 OR,0.6;95%CI,0.4-0.8)。与<3 个月相比,风险降低幅度最大,为 60%-70%,包括有≥12 个月的终生母乳喂养(调整后的 OR,0.4;95%CI,0.2-0.6)和 9-<12 个月的终生纯母乳喂养(调整后的 OR,0.3;95%CI,0.2-0.6)。与人群对照组相比,使用子宫切除术对照组进行分析时,我们观察到类似的关联模式,其幅度略有减弱。
母乳喂养史与子宫腺肌病风险降低 40%相关,而子宫腺肌病会导致严重的发病和需要进行子宫切除术以进行确定性治疗。我们的研究结果与之前的一项研究一致,支持母乳喂养可能改变子宫腺肌病的风险。