Suppr超能文献

一套新颖的奥地利参考单位成本,用于全面的社会视角,符合最新的欧洲成本效益分析方法。

A novel set of Austrian reference unit costs for comprehensive societal perspectives consistent with latest European costing methods for economic evaluations.

机构信息

Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15/1, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, OX3 7JX, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024 Jan;136(1-2):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00508-022-02128-6. Epub 2022 Dec 23.

Abstract

Decision making in public health often happens against the background of scarce resources. The systematic use of economic evaluations can be a main enabler in the alignment of public health goals with budgetary constraints. However, the lack of standardized methodology in terms of costing method and perspective are a critical barrier to the implementation of economic evaluations and the international comparability of results. We present a novel set of 22 reference unit costs (RUCs) optimized for cross-sectoral economic evaluations in Austria suitable for international comparability calculated using the standardized PECUNIA RUC Template. The common framework for costing and reporting, as well as the easy availability of the RUCs will reduce the burden on researchers and policy makers in future economic evaluations. The higher quality, accuracy, transparency and availability of economic evidence for policy design will help to improve the efficiency of public health-relevant healthcare decisions and make it easier for policy makers to bring funding arrangements and decision making across multiple sectors in line with Health-in-All-Policies goals.

摘要

公共卫生决策通常是在资源稀缺的背景下做出的。系统地使用经济评估可以成为使公共卫生目标与预算限制保持一致的主要手段。然而,在成本计算方法和视角方面缺乏标准化方法是实施经济评估和结果国际可比性的关键障碍。我们提出了一套新的 22 个参考单位成本(RUC),这些 RUC 经过优化,可用于奥地利跨部门经济评估,适合使用标准化的 PECUNIA RUC 模板进行国际可比性计算。成本计算和报告的通用框架以及 RUC 的易于获取性将减轻未来经济评估中研究人员和政策制定者的负担。更高质量、准确性、透明度和经济证据的可用性将有助于提高与公共卫生相关的医疗保健决策的效率,并使政策制定者更容易根据“所有政策中健康”目标调整多个部门的资金安排和决策。

相似文献

2
In Search for Comparability: The PECUNIA Reference Unit Costs for Health and Social Care Services in Europe.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 16;19(6):3500. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063500.
3
International comparability of reference unit costs of education services: when harmonizing methodology is not enough (PECUNIA project).
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2023 Jan;23(1):135-141. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2152331. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
5
Unit Costs in Health Economic Evaluations: Quo Vadis, Austria?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 22;20(1):117. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010117.
8
Costing evidence for health care decision-making in Austria: A systematic review.
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 14;12(8):e0183116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183116. eCollection 2017.
10
CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF THE SOCIETAL PERSPECTIVE WITHIN ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 Jan;33(2):251-260. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317000526. Epub 2017 Jun 23.

引用本文的文献

3
Unit Costs in Health Economic Evaluations: Quo Vadis, Austria?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 22;20(1):117. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010117.

本文引用的文献

1
In Search for Comparability: The PECUNIA Reference Unit Costs for Health and Social Care Services in Europe.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 16;19(6):3500. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063500.
4
The costs of bipolar disorder in the United Kingdom.
Brain Behav. 2021 Oct;11(10):e2351. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2351. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
5
Aspects and Challenges of Resource Use Measurement in Health Economics: Towards a Comprehensive Measurement Framework.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Sep;39(9):983-993. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01048-z. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
7
Disambiguation of psychotherapy: a search for meaning.
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;219(4):532-537. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2020.196.
9
The excess economic burden of mental disorders: findings from a cross-sectional prevalence survey in Austria.
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Sep;21(7):1075-1089. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01200-0. Epub 2020 May 26.
10
A general framework for classifying costing methods for economic evaluation of health care.
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Jun;21(4):529-542. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01157-9. Epub 2020 Jan 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验