• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生经济评估中的单位成本:奥地利将走向何方?

Unit Costs in Health Economic Evaluations: Quo Vadis, Austria?

机构信息

Department of Health Economics, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15/1, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 22;20(1):117. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010117.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20010117
PMID:36612439
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9819362/
Abstract

Evidence-informed healthcare decision-making relies on high quality data inputs, including robust unit costs, which in many countries are not readily available. The objective of the Department of Health Economics' Unit Cost Online Database, developed based on systematic reviews of Austrian costing studies, is to make conducting economic evaluations from healthcare and societal perspectives more feasible with publicly available unit cost information in Austria. This article aims to describe trends in unit cost data sources and reporting using this comprehensive database as a case study to encourage relevant national and international methodological discussions. Database analysis and synthesis included publication/study characteristics and costing reporting details in line with the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS 2022) with the year of the database launch as the cut-off point to assess how the methods have developed over time. Forty-two full economic evaluations and 278 unit costs were analyzed (2004-2016: 34 studies/232 unit costs, 2017-2022: 8 studies/46 unit costs). Although the reporting quality of costing details including the study perspective, unit cost sources and years has improved since 2017, the unit cost estimates and sources remained heterogeneous in Austria. While methodologically standardized national-level unit costs would be the gold standard, a systematically collated list of unit costs is a first step towards supporting health economic evaluations nationally.

摘要

循证医疗决策依赖于高质量的数据输入,包括可靠的单位成本,而在许多国家,这些数据并不容易获得。该数据库由卫生经济学部门开发,基于对奥地利成本研究的系统审查,旨在利用奥地利现有的公共可用单位成本信息,使从医疗保健和社会角度进行经济评估变得更加可行。本文旨在描述使用该综合数据库作为案例研究的单位成本数据来源和报告趋势,以鼓励相关的国家和国际方法学讨论。数据库分析和综合包括按照统一健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS 2022)的出版物/研究特征和成本报告细节,以截止日期为数据库发布年份,评估方法随时间的发展变化。共分析了 42 项全经济评估和 278 项单位成本(2004-2016 年:34 项研究/232 项单位成本,2017-2022 年:8 项研究/46 项单位成本)。尽管自 2017 年以来,包括研究视角、单位成本来源和年份在内的成本细节报告质量有所提高,但奥地利的单位成本估计值和来源仍然存在异质性。虽然在方法学上标准化的国家级单位成本将是黄金标准,但系统地收集单位成本清单是支持国家范围内经济评估的第一步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aa1/9819362/abd5f6aa1e4b/ijerph-20-00117-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aa1/9819362/abd5f6aa1e4b/ijerph-20-00117-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3aa1/9819362/abd5f6aa1e4b/ijerph-20-00117-g0A1.jpg

相似文献

1
Unit Costs in Health Economic Evaluations: Quo Vadis, Austria?卫生经济评估中的单位成本:奥地利将走向何方?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 22;20(1):117. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010117.
2
Costing evidence for health care decision-making in Austria: A systematic review.奥地利医疗保健决策的成本核算证据:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 14;12(8):e0183116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183116. eCollection 2017.
3
A novel set of Austrian reference unit costs for comprehensive societal perspectives consistent with latest European costing methods for economic evaluations.一套新颖的奥地利参考单位成本,用于全面的社会视角,符合最新的欧洲成本效益分析方法。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024 Jan;136(1-2):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00508-022-02128-6. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
4
A Systematic Review of Methodological Variation in Healthcare Provider Perspective Tuberculosis Costing Papers Conducted in Low- and Middle-Income Settings, Using An Intervention-Standardised Unit Cost Typology.采用干预标准化单位成本分类法对中低收入国家进行的医疗保健提供者视角下结核病成本核算论文方法学变异的系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Aug;38(8):819-837. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00910-w.
5
Are Unit Costs the Same? A Case Study Comparing Different Valuation Methods for Unit Cost Calculation of General Practitioner Consultations.单位成本相同吗?一项比较不同评估方法用于计算一般医生就诊单位成本的案例研究。
Value Health. 2020 Sep;23(9):1142-1148. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
6
Costs and economic evaluations of Quality Improvement Collaboratives in healthcare: a systematic review.医疗保健中质量改进合作的成本和经济评估:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 2;20(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4981-5.
7
The status of health economic evaluation within decision making in Austria.奥地利决策过程中健康经济评估的现状。
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2019 Sep;169(11-12):271-283. doi: 10.1007/s10354-019-0689-8. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
8
Systematic review of reporting quality of economic evaluations in plastic surgery based on the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.基于健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)声明的整形外科经济学评价报告质量的系统评价。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Oct;74(10):2458-2466. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.05.017. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
9
In Search for Comparability: The PECUNIA Reference Unit Costs for Health and Social Care Services in Europe.在寻找可比性方面:欧洲卫生和社会保健服务的 PECUNIA 参考单位成本。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 16;19(6):3500. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063500.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

本文引用的文献

1
The identification of economically relevant health and social care services for mental disorders in the PECUNIA project.PECUNIA 项目中与精神障碍相关的经济相关的健康和社会保健服务的识别。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 29;23(1):1045. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09944-0.
2
A novel set of Austrian reference unit costs for comprehensive societal perspectives consistent with latest European costing methods for economic evaluations.一套新颖的奥地利参考单位成本,用于全面的社会视角,符合最新的欧洲成本效益分析方法。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2024 Jan;136(1-2):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00508-022-02128-6. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
3
Magnitude of terminological bias in international health services research: a disambiguation analysis in mental health.
国际卫生服务研究中术语偏见的程度:心理健康中的消歧分析。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2022 Aug 22;31:e59. doi: 10.1017/S2045796022000403.
4
In Search for Comparability: The PECUNIA Reference Unit Costs for Health and Social Care Services in Europe.在寻找可比性方面:欧洲卫生和社会保健服务的 PECUNIA 参考单位成本。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 16;19(6):3500. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063500.
5
A systematic review of scope and quality of health economic evaluations conducted in Ethiopia.一项针对在埃塞俄比亚进行的卫生经济评价的范围和质量的系统评价。
Health Policy Plan. 2022 Apr 12;37(4):514-522. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac005.
6
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) Statement: Updated Reporting Guidance for Health Economic Evaluations.《2022 年健康经济评估报告标准》(CHEERS 2022)声明:健康经济评估报告的更新指南。
Value Health. 2022 Jan;25(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1351.
7
Costing of Essential Health Service Packages: A Systematic Review of Methods From Developing Economies.基本卫生服务包成本核算:对发展中经济体方法的系统评价
Value Health. 2021 Nov;24(11):1700-1713. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.05.021. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
8
An Introduction to the Main Types of Economic Evaluations Used for Informing Priority Setting and Resource Allocation in Healthcare: Key Features, Uses, and Limitations.用于为医疗保健中的优先事项设定和资源分配提供信息的主要类型经济评估简介:主要特点、用途和局限性。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 25;9:722927. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.722927. eCollection 2021.
9
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
10
The Relative Importance of Education and Criminal Justice Costs and Benefits in Economic Evaluations: A Best-Worst Scaling Experiment.教育和刑事司法成本与效益在经济评估中的相对重要性:最佳-最差标度实验。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Jan;39(1):99-108. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00966-8. Epub 2020 Oct 7.