Wiater J Michael, Oshikoya Olamide, Shields Edward, Vara Alexander D, Cavinatto Leonardo, Koueiter Denise M
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 May;32(5):1016-1021. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.11.011. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
To assess the role of latissimus dorsi tendon transfer (LDT) concomitant with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with external rotation (ER) deficit secondary to severe rotator cuff deficiency with and without glenohumeral arthritis.
Patients with a positive external lag sign and <10° of active external rotation (aER) treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty at a single institution with a minimum 12-month follow-up were retrospectively identified from a prospective database. Basic demographic information along with preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM) measures, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain, and Subjective Shoulder Value scores were obtained. Statistical analysis was performed to compare ROM and functional outcomes between patients who underwent concomitant LDT and those with no transfer (NT).
The LDT (n = 31) and NT (n = 33) groups had similar age, sex distributions, and follow-up length average (24 vs. 30 months). No differences were found between groups at baseline, final follow-up, or magnitude of change for ASES, VAS pain, and Subjective Shoulder Value scores. Baseline ROM measures were similar, except for the LDT group having slightly less aER (-8° vs. 0°; P = .004). In addition, all postoperative ROM measures including aER were similar, except for a slight improvement in active internal rotation in the NT group. The majority of patients were satisfied with their outcome (LDT 84% (n = 26); NT 87% (n = 27); P = .72).
Patients with ER deficit secondary to severe rotator cuff deficiency with and without glenohumeral arthritis undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty do not have significantly improved ER or patient-reported outcome measures with LDT.
评估背阔肌腱转移术(LDT)联合反式全肩关节置换术在伴有或不伴有盂肱关节炎的严重肩袖损伤继发外旋(ER)功能障碍患者中的作用。
从一个前瞻性数据库中回顾性识别出在单一机构接受反式肩关节置换术治疗且伴有外展滞后征阳性和主动外旋(aER)小于10°且至少随访12个月的患者。获取基本人口统计学信息以及术前和术后的活动范围(ROM)测量值、美国肩肘外科医师评分(ASES)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分和主观肩关节价值评分。进行统计分析以比较接受LDT联合手术的患者与未进行转移(NT)的患者之间的ROM和功能结果。
LDT组(n = 31)和NT组(n = 33)在年龄、性别分布和平均随访时间方面相似(分别为24个月和30个月)。两组在基线、最终随访时或ASES、VAS疼痛评分和主观肩关节价值评分的变化幅度方面均未发现差异。基线ROM测量值相似,只是LDT组的aER略少(-8°对0°;P = 0.004)。此外,除了NT组的主动内旋略有改善外,所有术后ROM测量值包括aER均相似。大多数患者对其结果满意(LDT组84%(n = 26);NT组87%(n = 27);P = 0.72)。
对于伴有或不伴有盂肱关节炎的严重肩袖损伤继发ER功能障碍且接受反式全肩关节置换术的患者,LDT并不能显著改善ER或患者报告的结果指标。