Suppr超能文献

零回波时间对比 T1 加权 MRI 用于评估皮质和骨髓骨形态异常,以 CT 作为参考标准。

Zero Echo Time vs. T1-Weighted MRI for Assessment of Cortical and Medullary Bone Morphology Abnormalities Using CT as the Reference Standard.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Sep;58(3):752-760. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28583. Epub 2022 Dec 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conventional MR pulse sequences result in poor signal from low T2 cortical bone because the minimum achievable echo time is limited. A sequence resulting in improved bone contrast is desirable.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the image quality and diagnostic performance of grayscale inversion zero echo time imaging (GI-ZTE) and grayscale inversion T1-weighted imaging (GI-T1WI) compared with computed tomography (CT).

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

SUBJECTS

A total of 50 patients with musculoskeletal tumors or tumor-like diseases of the lower extremities having MRI and CT studies.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: GI-T1WI and GI-ZTE sequences at 1.5 T.

ASSESSMENT

Assessed cortical and medullary bone morphology abnormalities using CT as the reference standard. Three radiologists scored the images quality and recorded nine metrics to assess the diagnostic performance.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Differences in image quality were calculated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to analyze the agreement of quantitative lesion parameters between CT and MR sequences, as well as the interobserver reliability. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Image quality score was significantly higher for CT images than GI-TIWI images. Except for radiologist 3 [4(0) vs 4 (1)], there was no significant difference in scores between CT and GI-ZTE [radiologist 1: 4 (0) vs 4 (0), P = 0.133; radiologist 2: 4 (0) vs 4 (0), P = 0.085]. There was good-excellent agreement between both MR sequences and CT for size, lesion number, location, sclerotic rim, expanded shell, destruction pattern, and matrix mineralization for all radiologists (ICC: 0.636-1.000). The consistency of periosteal reaction and penetration of the cortex was fair to good (0.481-0.729) between GI-T1WI and CT and good to excellent between GI-ZTE and CT (0.682-0.852).

DATA CONCLUSIONS

GI-ZTE images had superior intermodality agreement with CT images and allowed visualization of more cortical bone detail than GI-T1WI images.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

TECHNICAL EFFICACY

Stage 2.

摘要

背景

常规磁共振脉冲序列由于最小可实现回波时间受限,导致 T2 皮质骨信号较差。因此,需要一种可以改善骨对比度的序列。

目的

评估灰度反转零回波时间成像(GI-ZTE)和灰度反转 T1 加权成像(GI-T1WI)与 CT 相比的图像质量和诊断性能。

研究类型

前瞻性。

受试者

共 50 例下肢有肌肉骨骼肿瘤或肿瘤样疾病的患者,均行 MRI 和 CT 检查。

磁场强度/序列:1.5T 下的 GI-T1WI 和 GI-ZTE 序列。

评估

以 CT 为参考标准,评估皮质和髓腔骨形态异常。三位放射科医生对图像质量进行评分,并记录 9 项指标以评估诊断性能。

统计学检验

使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验计算图像质量差异。采用组内相关系数(ICC)分析 CT 和 MR 序列之间定量病变参数的一致性以及观察者间的可靠性。P 值<0.05 为差异有统计学意义。

结果

CT 图像的图像质量评分明显高于 GI-T1WI 图像。除放射科医生 3 外[4(0)比 4(1)],CT 与 GI-ZTE 之间的评分无显著差异[放射科医生 1:4(0)比 4(0),P=0.133;放射科医生 2:4(0)比 4(0),P=0.085]。对于所有放射科医生来说,MR 序列与 CT 之间在大小、病变数量、位置、硬化缘、膨胀壳、破坏模式和基质矿化方面具有良好到极好的一致性(ICC:0.636-1.000)。GI-T1WI 与 CT 之间的骨膜反应和皮质穿透的一致性为中等至良好(0.481-0.729),而 GI-ZTE 与 CT 之间为良好至极好(0.682-0.852)。

数据结论

与 CT 图像相比,GI-ZTE 图像具有更好的模态间一致性,并且可以显示比 GI-T1WI 图像更多的皮质骨细节。

证据水平

1 级。

技术功效

第 2 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验