Tang Run, Yang Jie, Liang Xiao-Jun, Li Yi, Wang Jun-Hu, Hao Yi-Xiang, Zhang Ruo-Xiao
Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Xi'an Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2022 Dec 25;35(12):1121-6. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2022.12.003.
To compare clinical efficacy of scarf osteotomy and double metatarsal osteotomy(DMO) in treating moderate to severe hallux valgus.
Fifty patients (81 feet) with moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity were treated from January 2017 to December 2019, and were divided into Scarf osteotomy (SO) group or DMO group according to different osteotomy methods. There were 26 patients (44 feet) in SO group, including 1 male and 25 females, aged from 48 to 65 years old with an average of (55.5±4.67) years old;18 patients (30 feet) with moderate and 8 patients (14 feet) with severe. There were 24 patients(37 feet) in DMO group, including 1 male and 23 females, aged from 45 to 62 years old with an average of (52.1±6.8) years old;there were 14 patients (24 feet) with moderate and 10 patients (13 feet) with severe. Hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) and relative length of the first metatarsal(RLFM) on weight-bearing anteroposterior radiographs before and after operation were compared. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux, metatarsal, and interphalangeal joint scores was used for evaluate clinical effects. Weight bearing time and complications were observed.
Fivty patients were followed up. The follow-up time in SO group ranged from 12 to 36 months with an average of(20.50±6.22) months and from 16 to 28 months with an avaerge of(19.80±2.44) months in DMO group while there was no significant difference between two groups(>0.05). All incision healed at stage I, and osteotomy healed at (20.31±3.17) months after operation. One patient occurred hallux adduction deformity, without transferred metatarsalgia;2 patients occurred metastatic metatarsalgia in DMO group. There were no significant difference in HVA, IMA, DMAA, and AOFAS scores between two groups(>0.05) before and after operation. There was no significant difference in RLFM between two groups(>0.05), while had significant difference in RLFM between two groups at final follow-up (<0.05). Partial weight-bearing time and full weight-bearing time in SO group were significantly earlier than those in DMO group (<0.05).
Both of Scarf osteotomy and the first metatarsal biplane osteotomy could effectively treat moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity, with similar imaging and clinical evaluation. However, the relative length of the first metatarsal bone in SO group was longer than that in DMO group after operation, and the time of weight bearing in Scarf osteotomy is earlier than that of double metatarsal osteotomy of the first metatarsal.
比较Scarf截骨术与双跖骨截骨术(DMO)治疗中重度拇外翻的临床疗效。
选取2017年1月至2019年12月收治的50例(81足)中重度拇外翻畸形患者,根据不同截骨方法分为Scarf截骨术(SO)组和DMO组。SO组26例(44足),男1例,女25例,年龄48~65岁,平均(55.5±4.67)岁;中度18例(30足),重度8例(14足)。DMO组24例(37足),男1例,女23例,年龄45~62岁,平均(52.1±6.8)岁;中度14例(24足),重度10例(13足)。比较手术前后负重位X线片上的拇外翻角(HVA)、跖间角(IMA)、第一跖骨头关节面角(DMAA)及第一跖骨相对长度(RLFM)。采用美国足踝外科协会(AOFAS)拇趾、跖骨及趾间关节评分评估临床疗效。观察负重时间及并发症情况。
50例患者均获随访。SO组随访时间12~36个月,平均(20.50±6.22)个月;DMO组随访时间16~28个月,平均(19.80±2.44)个月,两组比较差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。所有切口均Ⅰ期愈合,截骨术后(20.31±3.17)个月愈合。SO组1例出现拇内收畸形,无转移性跖骨痛;DMO组2例出现转移性跖骨痛。两组手术前后HVA、IMA、DMAA及AOFAS评分比较差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。两组术前RLFM比较差异无统计学意义(>0.05),末次随访时两组RLFM比较差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。SO组部分负重时间及完全负重时间均明显早于DMO组(<0.05)。
Scarf截骨术与第一跖骨双平面截骨术均能有效治疗中重度拇外翻畸形,影像学及临床评价相似。但SO组术后第一跖骨相对长度较DMO组长,Scarf截骨术负重时间早于第一跖骨双跖骨截骨术。