Dal Piva Amanda Maria O, Tribst João Paulo Mendes, Borges Alexandre Luiz S, Kleverlaan Cornelis J, Feilzer Albert J
Department of Dental Materials Science, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Universiteit van Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Oral Regenerative Medicine, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Universiteit van Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Dent Traumatol. 2023 Jun;39(3):191-199. doi: 10.1111/edt.12812. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Professional and amateur athletes might have veneer restorations. The aim of this study was to investigate the protective effect of mouthguards on veneered anterior restorations.
A nonlinear dynamic analysis was performed to simulate conditions during an impact with or without a custom-made mouthguard. Using a computer-aided design (CAD) software, a slice of a human maxilla was designed containing an upper right central incisor. The model was composed of mucosa, cortical bone, trabecular bone, periodontal ligament, dentin, enamel, and pulp tissue. The enamel was prepared (feather design), restored with an indirect veneer (1.0 mm thickness), and duplicated to simulate both conditions with or without a mouthguard (4 mm thickness). Both models were subdivided into finite elements using the computer-aided engineering (CAE) software. Frictionless contacts were used, and an impact was simulated in which a rigid sphere hit the model at 1 m s . Fixation was defined at the base of the bone. The elastic modulus of the veneer was assessed by using five different restorative materials (resin composite, hybrid ceramic, zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate, lithium disilicate, and zirconia). Von Mises stress, minimal principal stress, and maximum principal stress (in MPa) were obtained and plotted for visual comparison.
Von-Mises results showed higher stress concentrations in the veneer's cervical labial region for models without a mouthguard. Observing the quantitative results for each model, the highest compressive (709 MPa) and tensile (58 MPa) stresses occurred in the situation without a mouthguard with a zirconia veneer, while the lowest occurred in resin composite veneer with a mouthguard (8 and 5 MPa). The mouthguard was able to reduce the stresses in the tooth structure and it also reduced the risk of fracture in all conditions.
Mouthguards were beneficial in reducing the effects of dental trauma regardless of the restorative material used to manufacture the indirect veneer, since they act by dampening the generated stresses during the trauma event. Equal impact stresses on a mouthguard will lead to higher stresses in veneered teeth with more rigid restorative materials leading to a less protective effect.
背景/目的:职业和业余运动员可能会进行贴面修复。本研究的目的是调查护齿器对贴面修复的前牙的保护作用。
进行非线性动力学分析以模拟有或没有定制护齿器时的撞击情况。使用计算机辅助设计(CAD)软件,设计了包含右上中切牙的人类上颌切片模型。该模型由黏膜、皮质骨、松质骨、牙周韧带、牙本质、牙釉质和牙髓组织组成。制备牙釉质(羽状设计),用间接贴面(厚度1.0毫米)修复,并复制以模拟有或没有护齿器(厚度4毫米)的两种情况。使用计算机辅助工程(CAE)软件将两个模型都细分为有限元。采用无摩擦接触,模拟一个刚性球体以1米/秒的速度撞击模型的撞击情况。在骨的底部定义为固定。使用五种不同的修复材料(树脂复合材料、混合陶瓷、氧化锆增强硅酸锂、二硅酸锂和氧化锆)评估贴面的弹性模量。获得并绘制冯·米塞斯应力、最小主应力和最大主应力(单位为兆帕)以便进行视觉比较。
冯·米塞斯结果显示,没有护齿器的模型中,贴面的颈唇区域应力集中更高。观察每个模型的定量结果,在没有护齿器且使用氧化锆贴面的情况下,出现了最高的压缩应力(709兆帕)和拉伸应力(58兆帕),而在有护齿器的树脂复合材料贴面中应力最低(8兆帕和5兆帕)。护齿器能够降低牙齿结构中的应力,并且在所有情况下都降低了骨折风险。
无论用于制造间接贴面的修复材料如何,护齿器都有利于减少牙齿创伤的影响,因为它们通过减轻创伤事件中产生的应力而起作用。对护齿器施加相同的撞击应力会导致使用更刚性修复材料的贴面牙齿中产生更高的应力,从而导致保护作用降低。