Suppr超能文献

电子烟抽吸特征:评估用户行为以告知排放测试的重要性。

E-cigarette puffing topography: The importance of assessing user behaviour to inform emissions testing.

机构信息

Scientific Affairs, Broughton Life Sciences, Earby, UK.

whatIF? Consulting Ltd, Harwell, UK.

出版信息

Drug Test Anal. 2023 Oct;15(10):1222-1232. doi: 10.1002/dta.3322. Epub 2022 Jul 7.

Abstract

Analysis of the chemical composition of e-cigarette emissions is an important step in determining whether e-cigarettes offer both individual and population-level harm reduction potential. Commonly, e-cigarette emissions for chemical analysis are collected when using e-cigarettes according to standardised puffing regimens, such as those recommended by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) or the Cooperation Centre for Scientific Research Relative to Tobacco (CORESTA). While the use of such standard puffing regimens affords a degree of uniformity between studies and are also recommended by regulatory authorities who require the submission of e-cigarette emissions data to make decisions regarding allowing a product to be commercially marketed, the standardised regimens do not necessarily reflect human puffing behaviour. This can lead to under- or over-estimating real-world emissions from e-cigarettes and inaccuracy in determining their harm reduction potential. In this review, we describe how human puffing behaviour (topography) information can be collected both in the clinical laboratory and in the real world using a variety of different methodologies. We further discuss how this information can be used to dictate e-cigarette puffing regimens for collecting emissions for chemical analyses and how this may lead to better predictions both of human yields of e-cigarette emissions constituents and of risk assessments to predict e-cigarette tobacco harm reduction potential.

摘要

分析电子烟排放物的化学成分是确定电子烟是否具有个体和人群层面减少危害潜力的重要步骤。通常,电子烟排放物的化学分析是在按照标准化抽吸方案使用电子烟时收集的,例如国际标准化组织(ISO)或烟草科学研究合作中心(CORESTA)推荐的方案。虽然使用这种标准化抽吸方案可以在研究之间提供一定程度的一致性,并且也得到了监管机构的推荐,监管机构要求提交电子烟排放物数据,以决定是否允许产品进行商业营销,但标准化方案并不一定反映人类的抽吸行为。这可能导致低估或高估电子烟的实际排放量,并导致其减少危害潜力的准确性不足。在这篇综述中,我们描述了如何在临床实验室和现实世界中使用各种不同的方法收集人类抽吸行为(地形学)信息。我们进一步讨论了如何利用这些信息来规定用于收集化学分析排放物的电子烟抽吸方案,以及这如何可以更好地预测电子烟排放物成分的人体产量和风险评估,以预测电子烟的烟草减少危害潜力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验