Serviço de Gastrenterologia e Hepatologia, Hospital Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Clínica Universitária de Gastrenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Serviço de Gastrenterologia, Hospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal.
United European Gastroenterol J. 2023 Feb;11(1):51-59. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12356. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
Evidence supporting transmural remission (TR) as a long-term treatment target in Crohn's disease (CD) is still unavailable. Less stringent but more reachable targets such as isolated endoscopic (IER) or radiologic remission (IRR) may also be acceptable options in the long-term.
Multicenter retrospective study including 404 CD patients evaluated by magnetic resonance enterography and colonoscopy. Five-year rates of hospitalization, surgery, use of steroids, and treatment escalation were compared between patients with TR, IER, IRR, and no remission (NR).
20.8% of CD patients presented TR, 23.3% IER, 13.6% IRR and 42.3% NR. TR was associated with lower risk of hospitalization (odds-ratio [OR] 0.244 [0.111-0.538], p < 0.001), surgery (OR 0.132 [0.030-0.585], p = 0.008), steroid use (OR 0.283 [0.159-0.505], p < 0.001), and treatment escalation (OR 0.088 [0.044-0.176], p < 0.001) compared to no NR. IRR resulted in lower risk of hospitalization (OR 0.333 [0.143-0.777], p = 0.011) and treatment escalation (OR 0.260 [0.125-0.540], p < 0.001), while IER reduced the risk of steroid use (OR 0.442 [0.262-0.745], p = 0.002) and treatment escalation (OR 0.490 [0.259-0.925], p = 0.028) compared to NR.
TR improved clinical outcomes over 5 years of follow-up in CD patients. Distinct but significant benefits were seen with IER and IRR. This suggests that both endoscopic and radiologic remission should be part of the treatment targets of CD.
目前尚无证据支持黏膜愈合(TR)作为克罗恩病(CD)的长期治疗目标。不那么严格但更容易达到的目标,如孤立的内镜(IER)或放射学缓解(IRR),在长期内也可能是可接受的选择。
这项多中心回顾性研究纳入了 404 例接受磁共振肠造影和结肠镜检查评估的 CD 患者。比较了 TR、IER、IRR 和无缓解(NR)患者的 5 年住院率、手术率、激素使用率和治疗升级率。
20.8%的 CD 患者出现 TR,23.3%出现 IER,13.6%出现 IRR,42.3%出现 NR。TR 与较低的住院风险(比值比 [OR] 0.244 [0.111-0.538],p<0.001)、手术风险(OR 0.132 [0.030-0.585],p=0.008)、激素使用率(OR 0.283 [0.159-0.505],p<0.001)和治疗升级率(OR 0.088 [0.044-0.176],p<0.001)相关,与 NR 相比。IRR 可降低住院风险(OR 0.333 [0.143-0.777],p=0.011)和治疗升级率(OR 0.260 [0.125-0.540],p<0.001),而 IER 可降低激素使用率(OR 0.442 [0.262-0.745],p=0.002)和治疗升级率(OR 0.490 [0.259-0.925],p=0.028)与 NR 相比。
TR 改善了 CD 患者 5 年随访期间的临床结果。IER 和 IRR 均有显著但不同的获益。这表明内镜和放射学缓解都应该是 CD 治疗目标的一部分。