Rajput Ajay K, Gupta Pradeep K, Gill Simrat Pal S, Singh Santosh Kumar, Raj Manish, Singh Jasveer, Dubey Pawan, Sharma Pranav
Department of Orthopaedics, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences (UPUMS), Etawah, IND.
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Employee's State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) Hospital, Jajmau, Kanpur, IND.
Cureus. 2022 Dec 21;14(12):e32791. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32791. eCollection 2022 Dec.
Introduction The proximal femoral nail (PFN) is a widely accepted fixation method for the management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Reconstructing the lateral trochanteric wall and ensuring the stability of the trochanteric fragments are considered to be essential for enhancing the prognosis of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the results of the management of unstable intertrochanteric fracture of the femur using PFN and the screw-augmented PFN (aPFN). Methods This prospective comparative study was undertaken from January 2020 to July 2021 and included 60 patients presenting with unstable intertrochanteric fractures (AO/OTA type 31-A2.2 and 31-A2.3) at a tertiary care teaching institute in northern India. The enrolled patients were randomly divided into two groups (group 1 and group 2) and were managed with screw-augmented PFN and PFN, respectively. Functional outcome was evaluated using the Salvati and Wilson score at the 12-month follow-up. SPSS version 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. A p-value less than 0.05 was regarded as significant. Results The average time to union of the fractures in group 1 was 12.66 ± 1.68 weeks, while it was 13.47 ± 1.47 weeks in group 2 (p = 0.055). At the 12-month follow-up, the average functional outcome, as evaluated by Salvati and Wilson score, was 34 ± 2.40 in group 1, whereas it was 31.58 ± 4.4 in group 2; and the difference was observed to be statistically significant (p = 0.011). Group 1 had 28 patients (93.33%) with excellent to good results, while group 2 had 25 patients (83.33%) with excellent to good results. One patient in group 1 and five patients in group 2 had poor outcomes at the 12-month follow-up. Conclusion Screw-augmented PFN has better functional outcomes as compared to PFN alone for the management of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Hence, in our opinion, screw augmentation of PFN may be the better fixation technique for most unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures.
引言 股骨近端髓内钉(PFN)是治疗不稳定型股骨转子间骨折广泛采用的固定方法。重建股骨外侧壁并确保转子间骨折块的稳定性被认为是改善不稳定型股骨转子间骨折预后的关键。本研究旨在评估和比较使用PFN与螺钉增强型PFN(aPFN)治疗不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的效果。方法 本前瞻性对照研究于2020年1月至2021年7月进行,纳入了印度北部一家三级医疗教学机构的60例不稳定型股骨转子间骨折患者(AO/OTA 31-A2.2和31-A2.3型)。将入选患者随机分为两组(第1组和第2组),分别采用螺钉增强型PFN和PFN进行治疗。在12个月随访时,采用Salvati和Wilson评分评估功能结果。使用SPSS 24.0版(美国纽约州阿蒙克市IBM公司)进行统计分析。p值小于0.05被视为具有统计学意义。结果 第1组骨折平均愈合时间为12.66±1.68周,而第2组为13.47±1.47周(p = 0.055)。在12个月随访时,根据Salvati和Wilson评分评估,第1组平均功能结果为34±2.40,而第2组为31.58±4.4;差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.011)。第1组有28例患者(93.33%)结果为优至良,而第2组有25例患者(83.33%)结果为优至良。在12个月随访时,第1组有1例患者、第2组有5例患者结果较差。结论 对于不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的治疗,螺钉增强型PFN比单纯PFN具有更好的功能结果。因此,我们认为,对于大多数不稳定型股骨转子间骨折,PFN的螺钉增强可能是更好的固定技术。