Department of Orthopaedics, MGM Medical College and MY Hospital, 2-A, Scheme no. 71, Sector C, Footi Kothi Chouraha, Ring Road, Indore, M.P, 452009, India.
Int Orthop. 2022 Oct;46(10):2365-2371. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05488-w. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
Recent studies have proved the importance of intact lateral trochanteric wall, thus buttressing/fixing the broken lateral trochanteric wall irrespective of the implant, is likely to improve the alignment and outcome. We compared the outcome of lateral wall buttressing by trochanteric buttress plate (TBP) supplemented to proximal femoral nailing versus proximal femoral nailing alone in patients of broken lateral wall intertrochanteric fractures.
Sixty patients of intertrochanteric factures (IT) of femur with broken lateral wall were randomized into group A or B and were treated with either proximal femoral nail (PFN) alone or proximal femoral nail augmented with trochanteric buttress plate (PFN + TBP), respectively. The TBP plate used was primarily fixed to proximal femur via 8 mm hip screw and 6.4 mm antirotation screw of the PFN. Operative time, blood loss, radiation exposure, quality of reduction, functional outcome, union time, and complications were compared.
The mean age was 60.03 + 7.60 (range 42 to 70 years), with male to female ratio of 4:1 and left to right ratio of approximately 1:1. The mean follow up in the series was 16.2 months (range 13 to 36 months). Mean duration of surgery, mean intra-operative blood loss, and mean number of exposures in group A (PFN alone) were 64.88 + 12.24 min (48 to 88), 93 + 1.18 ml (60 to 120), and 32.13 (24 to 46) and in group B (PFN with TBP plate) were 91.86 + 12.78 min (70 to 122 min), 144.8 + 3.6 ml (116 to 208 ml), and 56.6 (38 to 112), respectively. Twenty-five patients and 28 patients in groups A and B respectively achieved score of 4 Chang quality reduction. Mean union time was 13.4 weeks in group A whereas in group B was 11.6 weeks. Mean HHS score in group A was 87.86 with 90% patients in comparison to 94.13 and 97% cases having excellent to good results in group B. In group A, 24 patients, while 29 patients in group B, had excellent to good results. Four patients had hip pain, four had impingement of screws, two had screw migration, three had Z/reverse effect, and four patients had shortening of more than 1 cm in group A. In group B, only one patient had impingement and none of the patient had hip pain, infection, implant failure, Z effect, or shortening.
The lateral trochanteric wall in IT fractures is significantly important, and when the lateral wall is broken, it can lead to poor results. TBP plate which is applied laterally on femur along with nail and fixing the plate with hip screw and antirotational screw provides faster union, early weight bearing, better reduction, and so better hip functions. TBP can be used successfully to augment, fix, or buttress the lateral trochanteric wall giving excellent to good results but at the cost of surgical time, blood loss, and radiation exposure.
最近的研究证明了完整的外侧转子壁的重要性,因此,无论植入物如何,支撑/固定破裂的外侧转子壁都可能改善对齐和结果。我们比较了在外侧壁破裂的转子间骨折患者中,使用转子加强板(TBP)加强股骨近端髓内钉(PFN)与单纯使用股骨近端髓内钉治疗的结果。
将 60 例外侧壁破裂的转子间骨折(IT)患者随机分为 A 组或 B 组,分别采用单纯股骨近端钉(PFN)或股骨近端钉联合转子加强板(PFN+TBP)治疗。使用的 TBP 板主要通过 PFN 的 8mm 髋关节螺钉和 6.4mm 抗旋螺钉固定在近端股骨上。比较手术时间、失血量、辐射暴露、复位质量、功能结果、愈合时间和并发症。
平均年龄为 60.03±7.60 岁(范围 42 至 70 岁),男女比例为 4:1,左右比例约为 1:1。本系列的平均随访时间为 16.2 个月(范围 13 至 36 个月)。A 组(单纯 PFN)的手术平均持续时间、术中平均失血量和平均曝光次数分别为 64.88±12.24 分钟(48 至 88 分钟)、93±1.18ml(60 至 120ml)和 32.13(24 至 46),B 组(PFN+TBP 板)分别为 91.86±12.78 分钟(70 至 122 分钟)、144.8±3.6ml(116 至 208ml)和 56.6(38 至 112)。A 组和 B 组分别有 25 例和 28 例患者达到 Chang 质量评分 4 分。A 组的平均愈合时间为 13.4 周,B 组为 11.6 周。A 组的平均 HHS 评分为 87.86,90%的患者与 B 组的 94.13 和 97%的病例具有优秀到良好的结果相比。A 组有 24 例患者,B 组有 29 例患者有优秀到良好的结果。A 组有 4 例患者髋部疼痛,4 例患者螺钉撞击,2 例患者螺钉迁移,3 例患者 Z/反效果,4 例患者缩短超过 1cm。B 组只有 1 例患者有撞击,没有患者有髋部疼痛、感染、植入物失败、Z 效果或缩短。
转子间骨折的外侧转子壁非常重要,当外侧壁破裂时,会导致不良结果。TBP 板沿股骨外侧放置,与钉一起使用,并使用髋关节螺钉和抗旋螺钉固定,可更快地愈合,更早地负重,更好地复位,从而更好地发挥髋关节功能。TBP 可成功用于加强、固定或支撑外侧转子壁,获得优秀到良好的结果,但代价是手术时间、失血量和辐射暴露。