• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

民间社会在动员基本药物人权斗争中的作用:从艾滋病毒/艾滋病到 COVID-19 的批判。

The Role of Civil Society in Mobilizing Human Rights Struggles for Essential Medicines: A Critique from HIV/AIDS to COVID-19.

机构信息

Professor of Global Health Law in the School of Law at the University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.

An associate tutor and academic researcher in the School of Law at the University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Health Hum Rights. 2022 Dec;24(2):177-189.

PMID:36579304
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9790953/
Abstract

In this paper, we explore the strategies utilized by civil society organizations to improve access to medicines during the HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 health crises. In particular, we seek to illuminate why some of the successful approaches for increasing access to antiretrovirals for HIV/AIDS in the early 2000s failed in creating equitable global access to COVID-19 vaccines. While civil society has historically mobilized human rights to facilitate greater access to essential medicines, we argue that earlier strategies were not always sustainable and that civil society is now mobilizing human rights in radically different ways than previously. Instead of focusing chiefly on securing an intellectual property waiver to the TRIPS Agreement, civil society organizations are now challenging vaccine injustice, rejecting the "charity discourse" that fuels Global South dependency on Global North actors in favor of scaling up manufacture in low- and middle-income countries, and moving to embed the right to access medicines in a new World Health Organization pandemic treaty with civil society organization participation and meaningful representation from low- and middle-income countries. Such approaches, we contend, will lead to more sustainable solutions in order to avert further health care disasters, like those seen with two distinct but related struggles-the fights for equitable access to essential medicines for HIV/AIDS and for COVID-19.

摘要

在本文中,我们探讨了民间社会组织在艾滋病毒/艾滋病和 COVID-19 卫生危机期间为改善药品获取而采用的策略。特别是,我们试图阐明为什么 21 世纪初为增加艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者获得抗逆转录病毒药物的机会而采用的一些成功方法在为 COVID-19 疫苗创造公平的全球获取机会方面失败了。虽然民间社会历来利用人权来促进更多地获取基本药物,但我们认为,早期的策略并不总是可持续的,民间社会现在正在以与以前截然不同的方式动员人权。民间社会组织现在正在挑战疫苗不公平,拒绝助长南方国家对北方国家行为体依赖的“慈善话语”,转而支持在中低收入国家扩大生产,将获得药品的权利纳入新的世界卫生组织大流行条约,其中包括民间社会组织的参与和来自中低收入国家的有意义的代表性,而不是主要关注确保对《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》的知识产权豁免。我们认为,这些方法将导致更可持续的解决方案,以避免进一步的医疗保健灾难,就像在两个截然不同但相关的斗争中看到的那样——为艾滋病毒/艾滋病和 COVID-19 获得基本药物的公平获取而进行的斗争。

相似文献

1
The Role of Civil Society in Mobilizing Human Rights Struggles for Essential Medicines: A Critique from HIV/AIDS to COVID-19.民间社会在动员基本药物人权斗争中的作用:从艾滋病毒/艾滋病到 COVID-19 的批判。
Health Hum Rights. 2022 Dec;24(2):177-189.
2
Improving Access to COVID-19 Vaccines: An Analysis of TRIPS Waiver Discourse among WTO Members, Civil Society Organizations, and Pharmaceutical Industry Stakeholders.**提高 COVID-19 疫苗可及性:对 WTO 成员、民间社会组织和制药行业利益相关者中 TRIPS 豁免讨论的分析**。
Health Hum Rights. 2022 Dec;24(2):159-175.
3
Driving a decade of change: HIV/AIDS, patents and access to medicines for all.推动十年变革:艾滋病毒/艾滋病、专利与全民获得药物。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2011 Mar 27;14:15. doi: 10.1186/1758-2652-14-15.
4
COVID-19 Vaccine, TRIPS, and Global Health Diplomacy: India's Role at the WTO Platform.COVID-19 疫苗、TRIPS 协定与全球卫生外交:印度在世贸组织平台上的作用。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Aug 26;2021:6658070. doi: 10.1155/2021/6658070. eCollection 2021.
5
Can we move beyond vaccine apartheid? Examining the determinants of the COVID-19 vaccine gap.我们能否超越疫苗隔离?审视 COVID-19 疫苗差距的决定因素。
Glob Public Health. 2023 Jan;18(1):2256822. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2023.2256822.
6
Decolonising human rights: how intellectual property laws result in unequal access to the COVID-19 vaccine.去殖民化人权:知识产权法如何导致对 COVID-19 疫苗的不平等获取。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jul;6(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006169.
7
Business as Usual? Centering Human Rights to Advance Global COVID-19 Vaccine Equity Through COVAX.一切照旧?通过 COVAX 以人权为中心推进全球 COVID-19 疫苗公平性。
Health Hum Rights. 2022 Dec;24(2):219-228.
8
Tuberculosis结核病
9
Defending access to medicines in regional trade agreements: lessons from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership - a qualitative study of policy actors' views.在区域贸易协定中捍卫药品可及性:区域全面经济伙伴关系的经验教训——政策行为者观点的定性研究。
Global Health. 2021 Jul 8;17(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00721-4.
10
The role of intellectual property rights on access to medicines in the WHO African region: 25 years after the TRIPS agreement.知识产权在世界卫生组织非洲区域获得药品方面的作用:《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》通过 25 年后。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 11;21(1):490. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10374-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Civil Society's Evidence-Generating Role for Health Policy Decisions: A Thematic Analysis of a Healthcare Information for All (HIFA) Community Online Discussion.公民社会在卫生政策决策中的证据生成作用:全民医疗保健信息(HIFA)社区在线讨论的主题分析
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2025;14:8701. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.8701. Epub 2025 Jul 12.
2
Civil society activism for Africa's vaccine and local manufacturing agenda: Can mpox be the test case?民间社会推动非洲疫苗及本地生产议程的行动:猴痘能否成为试金石?
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Sep 17;4(9):e0003738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003738. eCollection 2024.
3
Financing for pandemic preparedness and response measures: a systematic scoping review.大流行防范和应对措施的融资:系统范围界定审查。
Bull World Health Organ. 2024 May 1;102(5):314-322F. doi: 10.2471/BLT.23.290207. Epub 2024 Feb 22.
4
Colonialism in the new digital health agenda.新数字健康议程中的殖民主义。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Feb 27;9(2):e014131. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014131.

本文引用的文献

1
A pandemic treaty for equitable global access to medical countermeasures: seven recommendations for sharing intellectual property, know-how and technology.一项关于全球公平获取医疗应对措施的大流行条约:关于共享知识产权、专有技术和技术的七条建议
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Jul;7(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009709.
2
States cannot negotiate a pandemic treaty alone.各国无法单独谈判一项大流行条约。
BMJ. 2022 May 20;377:o1281. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o1281.
3
What is the impact of intellectual property rules on access to medicines? A systematic review.知识产权规则对药品可及性有何影响?一项系统综述。
Global Health. 2022 Apr 15;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00826-4.
4
Vaccine apartheid: global cooperation and equity.疫苗种族隔离:全球合作与公平
Lancet. 2022 Apr 16;399(10334):1452-1453. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00328-2. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
5
COVAX and the rise of the 'super public private partnership' for global health.新冠疫苗全球免疫合作机制(COVAX)与全球卫生领域“超级公私伙伴关系”的兴起。
Glob Public Health. 2023 Jan;18(1):1987502. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1987502. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
6
We Cannot Win the Access to Medicines Struggle Using the Same Thinking That Causes the Chronic Access Crisis.我们不能用导致慢性获取危机的思维方式来赢得药品获取斗争。
Health Hum Rights. 2021 Jun;23(1):119-127.
7
Four Challenges That Global Health Networks Face.全球健康网络面临的四大挑战。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Apr 1;6(4):183-189. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.14.
8
Editorial: promoting equity in health: what role for courts?社论:促进健康公平:法院应发挥何种作用?
Health Hum Rights. 2014 Dec 11;16(2):E1-9.
9
When falsified medicines enter the supply chain: description of an incident in Kenya and lessons learned for rapid response.当假药进入供应链时:肯尼亚事件描述及快速应对的经验教训。
J Public Health Policy. 2013 Jan;34(1):22-30. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2012.53. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
10
Combating counterfeit medicines and illicit trade in tobacco products: minefields in global health governance.打击假药和烟草制品非法贸易:全球卫生治理中的雷区。
J Law Med Ethics. 2012 Summer;40(2):326-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00667.x.