Suppr超能文献

宫颈癌骨髓保护调强放疗中改良容积旋转调强放疗的剂量学分析——一种替代常规容积旋转调强放疗的方法。

A Dosimetric Analysis of Modified Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Bone Marrow Sparing Radiotherapy in Cervical Cancer-An alternative Approach to Conventional VMAT.

机构信息

Research and Development Centre, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, India.

Department of Radiotherapy, Vadamalayan Hospitals Integrated Cancer Centre, Madurai, India.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Dec 1;23(12):4323-4332. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.12.4323.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

External beam radiotherapy remains the primary treatment modality in cervical cancer. Nowadays Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) are increasingly being used to reduce normal tissue toxicity. The drawback of conventional  VMAT is that a considerable volume of pelvic bone marrow receives a low dose.

AIM

We analyzed whether there was a way to reduce the volume of the low dose regions of bone marrow, and assessed the potential benefit of conventional-4Arc (C-4Arc VMAT), and Modified-4Arc (M-4Arc VMAT) over the conventional 2 ARC VMAT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve clinically proven locally advanced cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy by Conventional VMAT (RapidArc) in dual rotation mode (C-2Arc VMAT) were selected for this study.C-4Arc VMAT and M-4Arc VMAT dose plans were generated for these twelve patients and these three different types of plans were evaluated for the quality and compared dosimetrically.

RESULTS

M-4Arc VMAT designs exhibited a greater bone marrow sparing when compared with conventional VMATs with respect to volume receiving 5Gy to 35Gy without compromising PTV dose coverage. M-4Arc VMAT plans, the bone marrow volume receiving 30 Gy (V30Gy),40Gy (V40Gy), and mean doses were lower than the C- 4 Arc plan and a similar result was observed for V50(Gy) also when comparing with the standard 2 Arc plan. In modified VMAT plans, the rectum and bladder dose volumes were lower than standard VMAT. Similarly, the bowel bag V35(Gy), V40(Gy), V50(Gy), mean doses. The right and left femoral head doses were reduced significantly when compared to conventional VMAT plans.

CONCLUSION

The M-4Arc VMAT plans are better than the C-2Arc and C-4Arc VMAT plans for reducing the dose to bone marrow by limiting the MLC field width travel.

摘要

背景

外照射放疗仍然是宫颈癌的主要治疗方式。如今,调强放疗(IMRT)和容积旋转调强放疗(VMAT)越来越多地被用于降低正常组织毒性。传统 VMAT 的缺点是大量骨盆骨髓接受低剂量照射。

目的

我们分析是否有一种方法可以减少骨髓低剂量区域的体积,并评估传统 4 弧(C-4Arc VMAT)和改良 4 弧(M-4Arc VMAT)相对于传统 2 弧 VMAT 的潜在益处。

材料和方法

选择了 12 例经临床证实的局部晚期宫颈癌患者,这些患者在双旋转模式下接受常规 VMAT(RapidArc)同步化疗(C-2Arc VMAT)治疗。为这 12 名患者生成了 C-4Arc VMAT 和 M-4Arc VMAT 剂量计划,并对这三种不同类型的计划进行了质量评估和比较。

结果

与常规 VMAT 相比,M-4Arc VMAT 设计在不影响 PTV 剂量覆盖的情况下,在接受 5Gy 至 35Gy 剂量的骨髓体积方面具有更大的骨髓保护作用。M-4Arc VMAT 计划中,接受 30Gy(V30Gy)、40Gy(V40Gy)和平均剂量的骨髓体积低于 C-4Arc 计划,与标准 2 弧计划相比,V50(Gy)也观察到类似的结果。在改良 VMAT 计划中,直肠和膀胱剂量体积低于标准 VMAT。同样,肠袋 V35(Gy)、V40(Gy)、V50(Gy)和平均剂量也较低。与常规 VMAT 计划相比,左右股骨头剂量显著降低。

结论

与 C-2Arc 和 C-4Arc VMAT 计划相比,M-4Arc VMAT 计划通过限制 MLC 叶片宽度的移动,更好地降低了骨髓剂量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f332/9971454/8d87d6f7c3f1/APJCP-23-4323-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验