Rodas Karly A, Dulla Joseph M, Moreno Matthew R, Bloodgood Ashley M, Thompson Megan B, Orr Robin M, Dawes J Jay, Lockie Robert G
Center for Sport Performance, Department of Kinesiology, California State University-Fullerton, Fullerton, CA, USA.
Tactical Research Unit, Bond University, Robina, Qld, AUSTRALIA.
Int J Exerc Sci. 2022 Dec 1;15(3):1641-1660. doi: 10.70252/KPRM9974. eCollection 2022.
This study investigated traditional training (TT) versus ability-based training (ABT) in custody assistant recruits. Retrospective analysis was conducted on two recruit classes who completed an 8-week academy. The TT group (18 males, 13 females) followed a physical training model where recruits completed the same exercises with the same intensity; the ABT group (17 males, 12 females) had exercises tailored towards their ability. Pre- and post-academy, recruits were assessed in: body mass; body fat percentage (BF%); resting heart rate (RHR); blood pressure (BP); waist circumference (WC); waist-to-hip ratio (WHR); grip strength; push-ups; sit-ups; YMCA step test recovery HR; 201-m run; and 2.4-km run. Independent samples t-tests evaluated between-class pre-test differences, with significance set at ≤ 0.05. Paired samples t-tests ( ≤ 0.05) detected within-group training changes. Change scores were calculated for each variable; independent samples t-tests ( ≤ 0.05) compared change scores between groups. The TT group had lower BF%, BP, and WC; and were superior in sit-ups and the 2.4-km run before training. After academy, the TT recruits improved WHR, grip strength, recovery HR, 201-m run, and 2.4-km run, but increased diastolic BP. The ABT recruits decreased BF%, RHR, and WC, and improved push-ups, sit-ups, recovery HR, 201-m run, and the 2.4-km run. ABT recruits had greater positive changes in BF%, RHR, diastolic BP, and sit-ups. TT and ABT recruits generally experienced favorable fitness changes; the degree of positive change tended to be greater for ABT recruits for select tests. Coupled with the diastolic BP increase for TT recruits, this may provide evidence for ABT.
本研究调查了拘留助理新兵的传统训练(TT)与基于能力的训练(ABT)。对完成8周训练的两个新兵班级进行了回顾性分析。TT组(18名男性,13名女性)采用体能训练模式,新兵以相同强度完成相同的练习;ABT组(17名男性,12名女性)的练习则根据其能力量身定制。在训练前和训练后,对新兵进行了以下评估:体重、体脂百分比(BF%)、静息心率(RHR)、血压(BP)、腰围(WC)、腰臀比(WHR)、握力、俯卧撑、仰卧起坐、YMCA台阶测试恢复心率、201米跑和2.4公里跑。独立样本t检验评估组间测试前差异,显著性设定为≤0.05。配对样本t检验(≤0.05)检测组内训练变化。计算每个变量的变化分数;独立样本t检验(≤0.05)比较组间变化分数。TT组在训练前的BF%、BP和WC较低,在仰卧起坐和2.4公里跑方面表现更优。训练后,TT组新兵的WHR、握力、恢复心率、201米跑和2.4公里跑有所改善,但舒张压升高。ABT组新兵的BF%、RHR和WC降低,俯卧撑、仰卧起坐、恢复心率、201米跑和2.4公里跑有所改善。ABT组新兵在BF%、RHR、舒张压和仰卧起坐方面有更大的正向变化。TT组和ABT组新兵总体上经历了有益的体能变化;在某些测试中,ABT组新兵的正向变化程度往往更大。再加上TT组新兵舒张压升高,这可能为ABT提供了证据。