Professor of Public Health, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, UCL, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Professor of Energy Policy, Vice Dean, School of Sustainability, Reichman University, Herzliya, Israel.
Perspect Public Health. 2024 Jul;144(4):232-241. doi: 10.1177/17579139221138451. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
The middle-out perspective (MOP) provides a lens to examine how actors positioned between government (top) and individuals (bottom) act to promote broader societal changes from the middle-out (rather than the top-down or bottom-up). The MOP has been used in recent years in the fields of energy, climate change, and development studies. We argue that public health practitioners involved with advocacy activities and creating alliances to amplify health promotion actions will be familiar with the general MOP concept if not the formal name. The article aims to demonstrate this argument.
This article introduces the MOP conceptual framework and customises it for a public health audience by positioning it among existing concepts and theories for actions within public health. Using two UK case studies (increasing signalised crossing times for pedestrians and the campaign for smoke-free legislation), we illustrate who middle actors are and what they can do to result in better public health outcomes.
These case studies show that involving a wider range of middle actors, including those not traditionally involved in improving the public's health, can broaden the range and reach of organisations and individuals involving in advocating for public health measures. They also demonstrate that middle actors are not neutral. They can be recruited to improve public health outcomes, but they may also be exploited by commercial interests to block healthy policies or even promote a health-diminishing agenda.
Using the MOP as a formal approach can help public health organisations and practitioners consider potential 'allies' from outside traditional health-related bodies or professions. Formal mapping can expand the range of who are considered potential middle actors for a particular public health issue. By applying the MOP, public health organisations and staff can enlist the additional leverage that is brought to bear by involving additional middle actors in improving the public's health.
中观视角(MOP)提供了一个视角,可以考察处于政府(顶端)和个人(底端)之间的行动者如何从中观层面(而非自上而下或自下而上)推动更广泛的社会变革。近年来,MOP 在能源、气候变化和发展研究等领域得到了应用。我们认为,从事倡导活动并建立联盟以扩大健康促进行动的公共卫生从业者,如果不是正式名称的话,也会熟悉一般的 MOP 概念。本文旨在论证这一观点。
本文介绍了 MOP 概念框架,并通过将其定位在现有的公共卫生行动概念和理论中,为公共卫生受众定制了该框架。我们使用了两个英国案例研究(增加行人的有信号横道穿越时间和争取无烟立法运动),说明了中观行动者是谁以及他们可以采取什么行动来改善公共卫生结果。
这些案例研究表明,让更广泛的中观行动者参与进来,包括那些传统上不参与改善公众健康的行动者,可以扩大参与倡导公共卫生措施的组织和个人的范围和影响力。它们还表明,中观行动者并非中立的。他们可以被招募来改善公共卫生结果,但他们也可能被商业利益所利用,以阻止健康政策的实施,甚至推动损害健康的议程。
将 MOP 作为一种正式方法可以帮助公共卫生组织和从业者考虑来自传统健康相关机构或专业之外的潜在“盟友”。正式映射可以扩大被认为是特定公共卫生问题的潜在中观行动者的范围。通过应用 MOP,公共卫生组织和工作人员可以利用更多的中观行动者来提高公众的健康水平,从而获得额外的影响力。