Suppr超能文献

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,重复使用个人防护装备(PPE)并未增加创伤外科患者的手术部位感染:密歇根创伤中心的回顾性队列研究。

Reusing personal protective equipment (PPE) did not increase surgical site infection in trauma surgical patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective cohort study in Michigan Trauma Centers.

机构信息

Department of Trauma, Acute, and Critical Care Surgery, Trinity Health, Ann Arbor, MI.

Department of Trauma, Acute, and Critical Care Surgery, Trinity Health, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2023 Sep;51(9):996-998. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.12.010. Epub 2022 Dec 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reuse of personal protective equipment (PPE), masks more specifically, during the COVID-19 pandemic was common. The primary objective of this study was to compare pre-pandemic surgical site infection (SSI) rates prior to reuse of PPE, to pandemic SSI rates after reuse of PPE in trauma surgical patients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis collected from the Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was performed. The pre-COVID cohort was from March 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 and post-COVID cohort was March 1, 2020 to December 31,2020. Descriptive statistics were used to assess differences between variables in each cohort.

RESULTS

Nearly half (49.8%) of our cohort (n = 48,987) was in the post-COVID group. There was no significant difference in frequency of operative intervention between groups (p > .05). There was no significant increase (p > .05) between pre- and post-COVID cohorts for superficial, deep, or organ space SSI when reuse of masks was common.

CONCLUSION

Reuse of PPE did not lead to an increase in SSI in surgical patients. These findings are consistent with previous studies, but the first to be described in the trauma surgical patient population. Studies such as this may help inform further discussion regarding PPE usage as we continue to emerge from the current pandemic with the continuous threat of future pandemics.

摘要

背景

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,个人防护设备(PPE),尤其是口罩的重复使用较为常见。本研究的主要目的是比较 PPE 重复使用前的大流行前手术部位感染(SSI)率,以及 PPE 重复使用后的大流行期间创伤外科患者的 SSI 率。

方法

对密歇根创伤质量改进计划数据库进行回顾性队列分析。COVID-19 前队列为 2019 年 3 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日,COVID-19 后队列为 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日。使用描述性统计分析评估每个队列中变量之间的差异。

结果

我们的队列近一半(49.8%)(n=48987)在 COVID-19 后队列中。两组之间手术干预的频率无显著差异(p>.05)。当口罩重复使用较为常见时,COVID-19 前和后队列之间的浅表、深部或器官间隙 SSI 发生率均无显著增加(p>.05)。

结论

PPE 的重复使用并未导致手术患者 SSI 增加。这些发现与之前的研究一致,但这是首次在创伤外科患者人群中描述。随着我们继续从当前大流行中走出,未来大流行的持续威胁,此类研究可能有助于进一步讨论 PPE 的使用。

相似文献

3
Risk of surgical site infection in hand trauma, and the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: A cohort study.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021 Nov;74(11):3080-3086. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.06.016. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
4
Behind the mask: extended use of surgical masks is not associated with increased risk of surgical site infection.
Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Feb;38(2):325-330. doi: 10.1007/s00383-021-05032-8. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
7
COVID-19 coronavirus: recommended personal protective equipment for the orthopaedic and trauma surgeon.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Jun;28(6):1690-1698. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06022-4. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
10
Impact of Coronavirus Disease-2019 Protocols on Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2022 Nov;23(9):841-847. doi: 10.1089/sur.2022.140. Epub 2022 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Using the interquartile range in infection prevention and control research.
Infect Prev Pract. 2024 Jan 10;6(1):100337. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100337. eCollection 2024 Mar.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验