Monash IVF, Melbourne, Australia.
Monash IVF Group, 252-256 Clayton Rd, Clayton, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Feb;40(2):389-398. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02701-y. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
Limited research has been published comparing PIEZO-ICSI with conventional ICSI. While positive effects have been documented in improving fertilization and degeneration, the outcomes in patients with previous poor results from conventional ICSI remain unclear. It is hypothesized that these patients may benefit the most from this form of insemination.
This retrospective paired within-patient cohort study investigated patients (n=72) undertaking PIEZO-ICSI after a previous conventional ICSI cycle resulted in poor outcomes (including low fertilization (<50%), high degeneration (>15%), and/or poor embryo development and utilization). Patients required at least five oocytes collected in both cycles and a period of less than 2 years between the cycles. The outcomes of both cycles were compared in respect to fertilization, degeneration, embryo utilization, and pregnancy rates. Further analyses were applied to patients <38 and ≥38 years of age, with <50% or ≥50% fertilization with conventional ICSI and with <20% or ≥20% utilization with conventional ICSI.
PIEZO-ICSI resulted in significantly higher fertilization (61.9% vs 45.3%, P<0.0001) and lower degeneration (7.7% vs 18.2%, P=0.0001) when compared to the conventional ICSI cycles. The greatest benefit was seen in patients who had less than 50% fertilization or <20% utilization in their conventional ICSI cycle, with improvements in fertilization and degeneration rates resulting in a significantly higher number of embryos utilized (frozen or transferred) per cycle.
PIEZO-ICSI improved fertilization, degeneration, and utilization rates in patients with previous poor outcomes from conventional ICSI. The number of embryos available for use per cycle was also increased. Further significant improvements were achieved in patients who exhibited poor fertilization (<50%) or low utilization (<20%) from conventional ICSI.
目前已发表的比较 PIEZO-ICSI 与传统 ICSI 的研究较少。虽然已经有研究证实其在提高受精率和减少胚胎退化方面有积极作用,但对于接受过传统 ICSI 且结局较差的患者的结果尚不清楚。据推测,这些患者可能从这种授精方式中获益最大。
本回顾性配对患者内队列研究调查了(n=72)在接受传统 ICSI 周期后结果较差(包括受精率低(<50%)、胚胎退化率高(>15%)和/或胚胎发育和利用不良)的患者,然后接受 PIEZO-ICSI。两次周期均至少收集了 5 个卵母细胞,且两次周期之间的时间间隔少于 2 年。比较两次周期的受精率、胚胎退化率、胚胎利用率和妊娠率。进一步的分析应用于年龄<38 岁和≥38 岁、传统 ICSI 受精率<50%或≥50%、传统 ICSI 利用率<20%或≥20%的患者。
与传统 ICSI 周期相比,PIEZO-ICSI 导致的受精率显著更高(61.9% vs 45.3%,P<0.0001)和胚胎退化率显著更低(7.7% vs 18.2%,P=0.0001)。在传统 ICSI 周期受精率<50%或利用率<20%的患者中,获益最大,受精率和胚胎退化率的提高导致每个周期利用的胚胎数量显著增加(冷冻或转移)。
PIEZO-ICSI 提高了接受过传统 ICSI 且结局较差患者的受精率、胚胎退化率和利用率。每个周期可用于使用的胚胎数量也增加了。在传统 ICSI 受精率<50%或利用率<20%的患者中,进一步显著提高了这些参数。