Guo Fei-Yan, Zhou Jia-Jun, Ruan Zhong-Yuan, Zhang Jian, Qi Lin
School of Economics and Management, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing 100192, China.
Institute of Cyberspace Security, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China.
Chaos. 2022 Dec;32(12):123116. doi: 10.1063/5.0113001.
The box-covering method plays a fundamental role in the fractal property recognition and renormalization analysis of complex networks. This study proposes the hub-collision avoidance and leaf-node options (HALO) algorithm. In the box sampling process, a forward sampling rule (for avoiding hub collisions) and a reverse sampling rule (for preferentially selecting leaf nodes) are determined for bidirectional network traversal to reduce the randomness of sampling. In the box selection process, the larger necessary boxes are preferentially selected to join the solution by continuously removing small boxes. The compact-box-burning (CBB) algorithm, the maximum-excluded-mass-burning (MEMB) algorithm, the overlapping-box-covering (OBCA) algorithm, and the algorithm for combining small-box-removal strategy and maximum box sampling with a sampling density of 30 (SM30) are compared with HALO in experiments. Results on nine real networks show that HALO achieves the highest performance score and obtains 11.40%, 7.67%, 2.18%, and 8.19% fewer boxes than the compared algorithms, respectively. The algorithm determinism is significantly improved. The fractal dimensions estimated by covering four standard networks are more accurate. Moreover, different from MEMB or OBCA, HALO is not affected by the tightness of the hubs and exhibits a stable performance in different networks. Finally, the time complexities of HALO and the compared algorithms are all O(N), which is reasonable and acceptable.
盒覆盖方法在复杂网络的分形特性识别和重整化分析中起着基础性作用。本研究提出了避免枢纽碰撞和叶节点选择(HALO)算法。在盒采样过程中,确定了正向采样规则(用于避免枢纽碰撞)和反向采样规则(用于优先选择叶节点),以进行双向网络遍历,从而降低采样的随机性。在盒选择过程中,通过不断移除小盒子,优先选择较大的必要盒子加入解。在实验中,将紧凑盒燃烧(CBB)算法、最大排除质量燃烧(MEMB)算法、重叠盒覆盖(OBCA)算法以及结合小盒移除策略和采样密度为30的最大盒采样算法(SM30)与HALO进行了比较。九个真实网络的结果表明,HALO实现了最高的性能得分,并且与对比算法相比,分别少用了11.40%、7.67%、2.18%和8.19%的盒子。算法的确定性得到了显著提高。通过覆盖四个标准网络估计的分形维数更加准确。此外,与MEMB或OBCA不同,HALO不受枢纽紧密程度的影响,并且在不同网络中表现出稳定的性能。最后,HALO和对比算法的时间复杂度均为O(N),这是合理且可接受的。