Rosendahl Jenny, Gawlytta Romina, Ressel Eva, Rodeck Johanna, Strauss Bernhard, Mehnert-Theuerkauf Anja, Koranyi Susan
Institute of Psychosocial Medicine, Psychotherapy and Psychooncology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Psychooncology. 2023 Mar;32(3):331-341. doi: 10.1002/pon.6082. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
Group treatments have proven to be effective for many mental disorders and showed beneficial effects in patients with medical illness. Aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to summarize the efficacy of group therapy for women with non-metastatic breast cancer.
We included studies comparing group therapy for women with non-metastatic breast cancer to non-active control groups, active control conditions, and individual psychotherapy. The primary outcome was mental distress, secondary outcomes were quality of life, coping, existential outcomes, fatigue, pain, and side effects. A comprehensive search was conducted in Medline, Web of Science, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, and DARE complemented by a manual search. Random-effects meta-analyses were run separately for different types of control groups.
Thirty-seven studies (5902 patients) were included. Small effects on mental distress in favor of group treatment were found (non-active control groups: n = 19, g = 0.42, 95% CI [0.29; 0.56], I = 61.6%; active control conditions: n = 6, g = 0.20, 95% CI [0.06; 0.35], I = 0%). Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and third wave CBT group approaches proved to be most effective. Group treatments also showed beneficial effects on secondary outcomes, with most profound evidence on quality of life and coping.
Results suggest that group interventions have the potential to reduce mental distress in women facing breast cancer. In the light of the considerable heterogeneity of most study effects, there is a need for more rigorous studies to strengthen the promising evidence and for trials examining the impact of patient and intervention characteristics on outcomes.
PROSPERO international prospective register of systematic reviews, CRD42020184357.
团体治疗已被证明对多种精神障碍有效,并对患有躯体疾病的患者显示出有益效果。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是总结团体治疗对非转移性乳腺癌女性患者的疗效。
我们纳入了比较非转移性乳腺癌女性患者团体治疗与非活性对照组、活性对照条件及个体心理治疗的研究。主要结局是心理困扰,次要结局包括生活质量、应对方式、存在性结局、疲劳、疼痛和副作用。在Medline、科学网、CENTRAL、PsycINFO和DARE中进行了全面检索,并辅以手工检索。针对不同类型的对照组分别进行随机效应荟萃分析。
纳入了37项研究(5902例患者)。发现团体治疗对心理困扰有小的有益影响(非活性对照组:n = 19,g = 0.42,95%CI[0.29;0.56],I² = 61.6%;活性对照条件:n = 6,g = 0.20,95%CI[0.06;0.35],I² = 0%)。认知行为疗法(CBT)和第三波CBT团体方法被证明是最有效的。团体治疗对次要结局也显示出有益效果,在生活质量和应对方式方面有最充分的证据。
结果表明团体干预有可能减轻面临乳腺癌的女性的心理困扰。鉴于大多数研究效应存在相当大的异质性,需要更严格的研究来加强这一有前景的证据,以及进行试验以检验患者和干预特征对结局的影响。
PROSPERO国际前瞻性系统评价注册库,CRD42020184357。