• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Educational needs assessment identifying opportunities to improve sepsis care.教育需求评估确定改善脓毒症护理的机会。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Dec;11(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001930.
2
Preliminary Performance on the New CMS Sepsis-1 National Quality Measure: Early Insights From the Emergency Quality Network (E-QUAL).新型 CMS 脓毒症-1 国家质量指标的初步表现:来自急诊质量网络(E-QUAL)的早期见解。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;71(1):10-15.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.06.032. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
3
Establishment of SEP-1 national practice guidelines does not impact fluid administration for septic shock patients.SEP-1 国家实践指南的制定并不影响脓毒性休克患者的液体管理。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Dec;62:19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.09.038. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
4
Hospitals That Report Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Bundle Compliance Have More Structured Sepsis Performance Improvement.报告严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克捆绑包依从性的医院在改善脓毒症方面的表现更具结构性。
J Patient Saf. 2022 Dec 1;18(8):e1231-e1236. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001062. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
5
Evidence Underpinning the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle (SEP-1): A Systematic Review.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理捆绑包(SEP-1)的证据基础:系统评价。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Apr 17;168(8):558-568. doi: 10.7326/M17-2947. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
6
Nurse Influence in Meeting Compliance With the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Quality Measure: Early Management Bundle, Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock (SEP-1).护士在促使符合医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心质量指标方面的影响:早期管理综合方案,严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克(SEP-1)
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2019 Mar/Apr;38(2):70-82. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000340.
7
Compliance with SEP-1 guidelines is associated with improved outcomes for septic shock but not for severe sepsis.遵循SEP - 1指南与感染性休克患者预后改善相关,但与严重脓毒症患者的预后改善无关。
J Intensive Med. 2022 May 11;2(3):167-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2022.03.003. eCollection 2022 Jul.
8
Evaluating the impact of severe sepsis 3-hour bundle compliance on 28-day in-hospital mortality: A propensity adjusted, nested case-control study.评价严重脓毒症 3 小时bundle 依从性对 28 天住院病死率的影响:倾向评分调整的嵌套病例对照研究。
Pharmacotherapy. 2022 Aug;42(8):651-658. doi: 10.1002/phar.2715. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
9
National Performance on the Medicare SEP-1 Sepsis Quality Measure.国家在 Medicare SEP-1 脓毒症质量测量上的表现。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug;47(8):1026-1032. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003613.
10
The Past, Present, and Future of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Quality Measure SEP-1: The Early Management Bundle for Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心质量指标SEP-1的过去、现在与未来:严重脓毒症/脓毒症休克的早期管理综合方案
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2017 Feb;35(1):219-231. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2016.09.006.

本文引用的文献

1
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;49(11):e1063-e1143. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337.
2
Epidemiology and Predictors of 30-Day Readmission in Patients With Sepsis.脓毒症患者 30 天再入院的流行病学和预测因素。
Chest. 2019 Mar;155(3):483-490. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2018.12.008.
3
A conceptual framework for planning and assessing learning in continuing education activities designed for clinicians in one profession and/or clinical teams.为某一专业的临床医生和/或临床团队设计的继续医学教育活动中的学习规划和评估的概念性框架。
Med Teach. 2018 Sep;40(9):904-913. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1483578. Epub 2018 Jul 28.
4
A quality improvement project to improve the Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) sepsis bundle compliance rate in a large healthcare system.一项旨在提高大型医疗系统中医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)脓毒症综合治疗方案依从率的质量改进项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2017 Oct 21;6(2):e000080. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000080. eCollection 2017.
5
Sepsis Definitions: The Search for Gold and What CMS Got Wrong.脓毒症的定义:探寻黄金标准以及医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的错误之处
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;18(5):951-956. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.4.32795. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
6
Preliminary Performance on the New CMS Sepsis-1 National Quality Measure: Early Insights From the Emergency Quality Network (E-QUAL).新型 CMS 脓毒症-1 国家质量指标的初步表现:来自急诊质量网络(E-QUAL)的早期见解。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;71(1):10-15.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.06.032. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
7
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症与脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2016版
Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):486-552. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002255.
8
The Past, Present, and Future of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Quality Measure SEP-1: The Early Management Bundle for Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock.医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心质量指标SEP-1的过去、现在与未来:严重脓毒症/脓毒症休克的早期管理综合方案
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2017 Feb;35(1):219-231. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2016.09.006.
9
Effect of performance improvement programs on compliance with sepsis bundles and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.绩效改进计划对脓毒症集束化治疗依从性及死亡率的影响:一项观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 May 6;10(5):e0125827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125827. eCollection 2015.
10
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.拯救脓毒症运动:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2012 年。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af.

教育需求评估确定改善脓毒症护理的机会。

Educational needs assessment identifying opportunities to improve sepsis care.

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA

School of Nursing, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Dec;11(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001930.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001930
PMID:36588307
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9723901/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In 2015, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services developed a national quality bundle for the management of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock (SEP-1). Despite performance improvement measures, compliance remains low. This needs assessment is the first stage of a quality improvement initiative to improve SEP-1 compliance. Using a conceptual outcomes framework, this needs assessment analyses SEP-1 compliance data, knowledge, and competence to identify gaps in care and educational opportunities.

METHODS

The needs assessment began with a review of national and statewide SEP-1 compliance data to identify a need for improvement. The needs assessment proceeded with a retrospective chart review to evaluate process measures and identify which providers would most likely benefit from educational interventions. A focus group provided perspective on the chart review findings.

RESULTS

During the period of 1 April 2017-31 March 2018, national SEP-1 compliance was 51% and compliance at the studied institution was 19%. The chart review included 51 patients (66.7% severe sepsis, 33.3% septic shock). Frequently missed SEP-1 measures included administration of intravenous fluids (0% severe sepsis, 58.8% septic shock), repeat lactate levels (52.6% severe sepsis, 60% septic shock), documentation of volume and tissue perfusion assessment (58.8%), vasopressor administration (73.3%) and administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics (76.5%, severe sepsis). Focus group perceptions identified themes related to gaps in declarative and dispositional knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS

This educational needs assessment highlights gaps in SEP-1 clinician performance, competence and knowledge. A multifaceted education programme is the next step for this performance improvement project. Education should include a series of meetings, activities, and workshops that include declarative knowledge, procedural knowledge and dispositional knowledge. Simulation activities can provide an opportunity for providers to demonstrate competence. Point-of-care prompts and performance measurement and feedback of patient care data can support clinician performance. This needs assessment underscores the need for a multifaceted approach to clinician education and performance to improve SEP-1 compliance.

摘要

简介

2015 年,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)制定了一项针对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克(SEP-1)患者管理的国家质量捆绑包。尽管采取了绩效改进措施,但合规性仍然较低。本需求评估是一项旨在提高 SEP-1 合规性的质量改进计划的第一阶段。本需求评估使用概念性结果框架,分析 SEP-1 合规性数据、知识和能力,以确定护理中的差距和教育机会。

方法

需求评估首先审查了国家和全州 SEP-1 合规性数据,以确定改进的必要性。需求评估接着进行了回顾性图表审查,以评估过程措施,并确定哪些提供者最有可能受益于教育干预。焦点小组对图表审查结果提供了看法。

结果

在 2017 年 4 月 1 日至 2018 年 3 月 31 日期间,全国 SEP-1 的合规率为 51%,而研究机构的合规率为 19%。图表审查包括 51 名患者(66.7%为严重脓毒症,33.3%为脓毒性休克)。经常错过的 SEP-1 措施包括静脉输液(0%严重脓毒症,58.8%脓毒性休克)、重复乳酸水平(52.6%严重脓毒症,60%脓毒性休克)、记录容量和组织灌注评估(58.8%)、血管加压素管理(73.3%)和广谱抗生素管理(76.5%,严重脓毒症)。焦点小组的看法确定了与声明性和处置性知识差距相关的主题。

结论

本教育需求评估突出了 SEP-1 临床医生表现、能力和知识方面的差距。多方面的教育计划是该绩效改进项目的下一步。教育应包括一系列会议、活动和研讨会,包括声明性知识、程序性知识和处置性知识。模拟活动可以为提供者提供展示能力的机会。床边提示以及患者护理数据的绩效测量和反馈可以支持临床医生的表现。本需求评估强调需要采取多方面的临床医生教育和绩效方法来提高 SEP-1 的合规性。