• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估快速抗原检测在诊断新型冠状病毒肺炎中的诊断性能。

Evaluation of diagnostic performance of a rapid antigen test in diagnosing COVID-19.

作者信息

Badawy Eman R, Ezz El-Din Azza M, El Zohne Randa A

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Assuit University, Egypt.

出版信息

Egypt J Immunol. 2023 Jan;30(1):14-19.

PMID:36588449
Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is our time's major global health crisis and the greatest health challenge. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is the gold standard technique for diagnosis of symptomatic cases and asymptomatic carriers. By 2020, antigen rapid tests have been approved for use in Covid-19 testing by regulatory bodies all over the world owing to their benefits as they are rapid and cost effective. This work aimed to determine the diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy of the SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to RT-PCR data. The study included 111 symptomatic COVID-19 patients and 20 control subjects. Of the 111 study patients, 91 patients (81.98%) were positive by RT-PCR and 20 patients negative. The BIOZEK antigen COVID-19 Ag rapid test device was evaluated using sera from the 111 symptomatic COVID-19 patients. Of the 91 RT-PCR positive patients, 81 (90.1%) were positive by the antigen rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT). The control subjects were negative by both tests. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of the Ag-RDT were 91.11%, 100%, 100%, 68.9%, and 91.8%, respectively and these increased as the level of viremia increased. In conclusion, the used Ag-RDT showed high sensitivity and accuracy for detecting of a SARS-CoV-2 infection, especially when the viral load was high. However, the test lacks sensitivity particularly in those with low viral load.

摘要

2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行是我们这个时代主要的全球健康危机和最大的健康挑战。严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测是诊断有症状病例和无症状携带者的金标准技术。到2020年,由于抗原快速检测具有快速且经济高效的优点,已被世界各地的监管机构批准用于COVID-19检测。这项工作旨在确定与RT-PCR数据相比,SARS-CoV-2快速抗原检测在检测SARS-CoV-2感染中的诊断敏感性和准确性。该研究包括111名有症状的COVID-19患者和20名对照受试者。在111名研究患者中,91名患者(81.98%)RT-PCR检测呈阳性,20名患者呈阴性。使用111名有症状的COVID-19患者的血清对BIOZEK抗原COVID-19 Ag快速检测设备进行了评估。在91名RT-PCR阳性患者中,81名(90.1%)通过抗原快速诊断检测(Ag-RDT)呈阳性。对照受试者两项检测均为阴性。Ag-RDT的总体敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和准确性分别为91.11%、100%、100%、68.9%和91.8%,并且随着病毒血症水平的升高而增加。总之,所使用的Ag-RDT在检测SARS-CoV-2感染方面显示出高敏感性和准确性,尤其是在病毒载量高时。然而,该检测缺乏敏感性,特别是在病毒载量低的人群中。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of diagnostic performance of a rapid antigen test in diagnosing COVID-19.评估快速抗原检测在诊断新型冠状病毒肺炎中的诊断性能。
Egypt J Immunol. 2023 Jan;30(1):14-19.
2
Comparative evaluation of RT-PCR and antigen-based rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs) for SARS-CoV-2 detection: performance, variant specificity, and clinical implications.实时荧光 RT-PCR 与抗原检测试剂用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测的比较评估:性能、变异株特异性和临床意义。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jun 4;12(6):e0007324. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00073-24. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
3
[Evaluation of the Rapid Antigen Detection Kit with the Polymerase Chain Reaction for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Respiratory Samples].[用于呼吸道样本中检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2的快速抗原检测试剂盒与聚合酶链反应的评估]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2022 Apr;56(2):263-273. doi: 10.5578/mb.20229806.
4
Evaluation of the Abbott Panbio™ COVID-19 antigen detection rapid diagnostic test among healthcare workers in elderly care.评估雅培 Panbio™ COVID-19 抗原检测快速诊断试剂在老年护理医护人员中的应用。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0276244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276244. eCollection 2023.
5
A Multicenter Clinical Diagnostic Accuracy Study of SureStatus, an Affordable, WHO Emergency Use-Listed, Rapid, Point-Of-Care Antigen-Detecting Diagnostic Test for SARS-CoV-2.一项关于 SureStatus 的多中心临床诊断准确性研究,SureStatus 是一种负担得起的、世界卫生组织紧急使用清单上列出的、快速的、即时抗原检测诊断 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断测试。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0122922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01229-22. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
6
SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test sensitivity and viral load in newly symptomatic hospital employees in Berlin, Germany, December, 2020 to February, 2022: an observational study.2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 2 月期间德国柏林新出现症状的住院员工中 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的敏感性和病毒载量:一项观察性研究。
Lancet Microbe. 2024 Jun;5(6):e538-e546. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00412-3. Epub 2024 May 14.
7
Bean Extract-Based Gargle for Efficient Diagnosis of Active COVID-19 Infection Using Rapid Antigen Tests.基于豆提取物的含漱液可用于使用快速抗原检测高效诊断活动性 COVID-19 感染。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0161421. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01614-21. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
8
Evaluation of a novel, rapid antigen detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2.评估一种新型的 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测试验。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 29;16(11):e0259527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259527. eCollection 2021.
9
Regional Evaluation of Two SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Diagnostic Tests in East Africa.东非地区两种 SARS-CoV-2 抗原快速诊断检测试剂的评估。
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0489522. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04895-22. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
10
Sars-Cov-2 Infection Screening Using Two Serological Testing Methods.采用两种血清学检测方法对 SARS-CoV-2 感染进行筛查。
Niger J Physiol Sci. 2020 Dec 31;35(2):117-121.

引用本文的文献

1
Laboratory Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 RT-LAMP Test.一种新型冠状病毒2019(SARS-CoV-2)逆转录环介导等温扩增(RT-LAMP)检测的实验室评估
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2023 Jun 13;8(6):320. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed8060320.