Craighead William D
Department of Economics and Geosciences, United States Air Force Academy, 2354 Fairchild Hall, Suite 6k110, USAF Academy, CO 80840-5002 USA.
Atl Econ J. 2022;50(3-4):133-146. doi: 10.1007/s11293-022-09752-7. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
This paper examines two types of preference shocks, shocks to the disutility of working and to the demand for goods relative to services, in an otherwise standard New Keynesian model. Existing literature has primarily focused on productivity and monetary shocks as driving processes. The contribution of this paper is to construct model-based processes for both types of preference shocks using United States data over 1948-2022 from the Bureau of Economic Analysis and Bureau of Labor Statistics and investigate the resulting dynamics in the New Keynesian framework. Constructing historical processes for the shocks provides context for examining the shifts that occurred during the coronavirus pandemic. Both preference shocks show movements of unprecedented magnitude that coincide with the pandemic. In the model, the relative demand shock leads to opposite movements in inflation and labor between the two sectors, while the shock to labor disutility is stagflationary, with inflation rising and output decreasing. A pandemic-motivated experiment with simultaneous large shocks to both labor disutility and relative goods demand generates divergences between the sectors in inflation and labor, but higher inflation and reduced output overall. This demonstrates that preference shocks may be useful for understanding the pandemic-era economy and suggests that they deserve more attention from economists and policymakers.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11293-022-09752-7.
本文在一个其他方面均为标准的新凯恩斯模型中,考察了两种类型的偏好冲击,即工作负效用冲击和商品相对于服务的需求冲击。现有文献主要关注生产率和货币冲击作为驱动因素。本文的贡献在于利用美国经济分析局和劳工统计局1948 - 2022年的数据,为这两种偏好冲击构建基于模型的过程,并在新凯恩斯框架下研究由此产生的动态变化。构建冲击的历史过程为考察新冠疫情期间发生的转变提供了背景。两种偏好冲击都显示出与疫情同时出现的前所未有的幅度变动。在模型中,相对需求冲击导致两个部门的通货膨胀和劳动力出现相反变动,而劳动负效用冲击是滞胀性的,通货膨胀上升且产出下降。一个由疫情引发的同时对劳动负效用和相对商品需求进行大幅冲击的实验,在通货膨胀和劳动力方面各部门之间产生了差异,但总体上通货膨胀更高且产出减少。这表明偏好冲击可能有助于理解疫情时期的经济,并表明它们值得经济学家和政策制定者给予更多关注。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s11293 - 022 - 09752 - 7获取的补充材料。