De Troyer Marijke, Wissing Karl Martin, De Clerck Dieter, Cambier Marie-Laure, Robberechts Tom, Tonnelier Annelies, François Karlien
Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 14;9:1009748. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1009748. eCollection 2022.
Recommendations and practice patterns for heparin dosing during hemodialysis show substantial heterogeneity and are scantly supported by evidence. This study assessed the variability in unfractionated heparin (UFH) dosing during hemodialysis and its clinical and biological anticoagulatory effects, and identified explanatory factors of heparin dosing.
Cross-sectional study assessing UFH dosing, coagulation tests - activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and activated clotting time (ACT) before dialysis start, 1 h after start and at treatment end (4 h) - and measurement of residual blood compartment volume of used dialyzers.
101 patients, 58% male, with a median dialysis vintage of 33 (6-71) months received hemodialysis using a total UFH dose of 9,306 ± 4,079 (range 3,000-23,050) IU/session. Use of a dialysis catheter ( = 56, 55%) was associated with a 1.4 times higher UFH dose ( < 0.001) irrespective of prior access function. aPTT increased significantly more than ACT both 1 h and 4 h after dialysis start, independent of the dialysis access used. 53% of patients with catheter access and ACT ratio < 1.5, 1 h after dialysis start had simultaneous aPTT ratios > 2.5. Similar findings were present at 1 h for patients with AVF/AVG and at dialysis end for catheter use. No clinically significant clotting of the extracorporeal circuit was noted during the studied sessions. Dialyzer's blood compartment volume was reduced with a median of 9% (6-20%) without significant effect of UFH dose, aPTT or ACT measurements and vascular access type.
UFH dose adaptations based on ACT measurements frequently result in excessive anticoagulation according to aPTT results. Higher doses of UFH are used in patients with hemodialysis catheters without evidence that this reduces dialyzer clotting.
血液透析期间肝素剂量的推荐和实践模式存在很大差异,且证据支持不足。本研究评估了血液透析期间普通肝素(UFH)剂量的变异性及其临床和生物学抗凝效果,并确定了肝素剂量的解释因素。
横断面研究评估UFH剂量、凝血试验——透析开始前、开始后1小时和治疗结束时(4小时)的活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)和活化凝血时间(ACT)——以及用过的透析器残余血室容积的测量。
101例患者,58%为男性,透析中位时间为33(6 - 71)个月,每次血液透析使用的UFH总剂量为9306±4079(范围3000 - 23050)IU。无论先前的血管通路功能如何,使用透析导管(n = 56,55%)与UFH剂量高1.4倍相关(P < 0.001)。透析开始后1小时和4小时,aPTT的升高均显著高于ACT,与使用的透析血管通路无关。透析开始后1小时,53%导管通路且ACT比值< 1.5的患者同时aPTT比值> 2.5。动静脉内瘘/动静脉移植物患者在1小时时以及导管使用患者在透析结束时也有类似发现。在研究期间未观察到体外循环有临床显著的凝血情况。透析器血室容积减少,中位数为9%(6 - 20%),UFH剂量、aPTT或ACT测量值以及血管通路类型对此无显著影响。
根据ACT测量调整UFH剂量常常导致根据aPTT结果出现过度抗凝。血液透析导管患者使用更高剂量的UFH,但没有证据表明这能减少透析器凝血。