• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

逆时针全旋转运动学可增强根管内牙胶和生物陶瓷封闭剂的去除:一项计算机断层扫描研究。

Full counterclockwise rotary motion kinematics enhances the removal of gutta-percha and bioceramic sealer from root canals: A computed tomographic study.

作者信息

Varghese Aswathi, Nandini Suresh, Sundar Sathish, Natanasabapathy Velmurugan

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2022 Nov-Dec;25(6):672-677. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_352_22. Epub 2022 Oct 13.

DOI:10.4103/jcd.jcd_352_22
PMID:36591591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9795683/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Complete removal of gutta-percha and sealer is an important step during retreatment. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and time taken by full counterclockwise rotary motion of a reciprocating file in the removal of gutta-percha and BioRoot™ RCS bioceramic sealer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six extracted human mandibular premolars were instrumented with Mtwo rotary files and obturated using lateral condensation technique with gutta-percha and BioRoot™ RCS bioceramic sealer. The teeth were divided into three retreatment groups ( = 12) based on the kinematics used: Group I, Mtwo retreatment (Mtwo-R) files; Group II, Reciproc files used in reciprocation mode (Reciproc-R); and Group III, Reciproc files used in full counterclockwise motion (Reciproc-CCW). The efficacy of gutta-percha and bioceramic sealer removal was assessed by volume of gutta-percha removed using cone-beam computed tomography and area of remaining gutta-percha and bioceramic sealer using ImageJ software after longitudinal sectioning. Statistical analysis was done by one-way analysis of variance test and Tukey's multiple tests.

RESULTS

Reciproc-CCW motion was significantly efficient in the removal of gutta-percha and bioceramic sealer in comparison to Mtwo-R files and Reciproc-R. The time taken for gutta-percha and sealer removal was least for Reciproc-R (325.5 ± 101.68 seconds) and was statistically significant in comparison to the other groups.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of the study, Reciproc-CCW was an effective method of removal of gutta-percha and bioceramic sealer during retreatment.

摘要

背景与目的

在根管再治疗过程中,彻底去除牙胶和封闭剂是重要的一步。本研究的目的是评估往复锉全逆时针旋转运动在去除牙胶和BioRoot™ RCS生物陶瓷封闭剂方面的效果及所需时间。

材料与方法

三十六颗拔除的人下颌前磨牙用Mtwo旋转锉进行预备,采用侧向加压技术用牙胶和BioRoot™ RCS生物陶瓷封闭剂进行充填。根据所使用的运动方式将牙齿分为三个再治疗组(每组 = 12颗):第一组,Mtwo再治疗(Mtwo-R)锉;第二组,以往复模式使用的Reciproc锉(Reciproc-R);第三组,以全逆时针运动使用的Reciproc锉(Reciproc-CCW)。通过锥形束计算机断层扫描测量去除的牙胶体积以及使用ImageJ软件在纵向切片后测量剩余牙胶和生物陶瓷封闭剂的面积,来评估牙胶和生物陶瓷封闭剂的去除效果。采用单因素方差分析和Tukey多重检验进行统计分析。

结果

与Mtwo-R锉和Reciproc-R相比,Reciproc-CCW运动在去除牙胶和生物陶瓷封闭剂方面显著更有效。Reciproc-R去除牙胶和封闭剂所需时间最短(325.5 ± 101.68秒),与其他组相比具有统计学意义。

结论

在本研究的局限性范围内,Reciproc-CCW是根管再治疗过程中去除牙胶和生物陶瓷封闭剂的有效方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be07/9795683/ec8d813b456a/JCD-25-672-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be07/9795683/3f8a7cd46689/JCD-25-672-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be07/9795683/ec8d813b456a/JCD-25-672-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be07/9795683/3f8a7cd46689/JCD-25-672-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be07/9795683/ec8d813b456a/JCD-25-672-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Full counterclockwise rotary motion kinematics enhances the removal of gutta-percha and bioceramic sealer from root canals: A computed tomographic study.逆时针全旋转运动学可增强根管内牙胶和生物陶瓷封闭剂的去除:一项计算机断层扫描研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2022 Nov-Dec;25(6):672-677. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_352_22. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
2
Comparison of the effectiveness of various rotary and reciprocating systems with different surface treatments to remove gutta-percha and an epoxy resin-based sealer from straight root canals.比较不同表面处理的各种旋转和往复系统从直根管中去除牙胶和基于环氧树脂的密封剂的效果。
Int Endod J. 2019 Jan;52(1):105-113. doi: 10.1111/iej.12985. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
3
Efficacy of reciprocating and rotary techniques for removing filling material during root canal retreatment.根管再治疗期间使用往复式和旋转式技术去除充填材料的疗效。
Int Endod J. 2013 Oct;46(10):947-53. doi: 10.1111/iej.12085. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
4
Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal retreatment with several NiTi systems.评价几种镍钛系统在根管再治疗中根管内碎屑的推出情况。
Int Endod J. 2015 Dec;48(12):1194-8. doi: 10.1111/iej.12425. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
5
Efficacy of Reciprocating Instruments in the Removal of Bioceramic and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealers: Micro-CT Analysis.往复式器械去除生物陶瓷和环氧树脂类封闭剂的效果:显微CT分析
Materials (Basel). 2021 Nov 5;14(21):6670. doi: 10.3390/ma14216670.
6
An in vitro CT Comparison of Gutta-Percha Removal with Two Rotary Systems and Hedstrom Files.两种旋转系统与Hedstrom锉去除牙胶尖的体外CT比较
Iran Endod J. 2013 Spring;8(2):59-64. Epub 2013 May 1.
7
Comparative evaluation of three different rotary instrumentation systems for removal of gutta-percha from root canal during endodontic retreatment: An study.三种不同旋转器械系统用于根管再治疗期间从根管中去除牙胶的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2017 Sep-Oct;20(5):311-316. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_132_17.
8
The Comparative Efficacy of Different Files in The Removal of Different Sealers in Simulated Root Canal Retreatment- An In-vitro Study.不同锉在模拟根管再治疗中去除不同封闭剂的比较疗效——一项体外研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 May;10(5):ZC130-3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/17731.7845. Epub 2016 May 1.
9
Efficacy of protaper next and protaper universal retreatment systems in removing gutta-percha in curved root canals during root canal retreatment.Protaper Next和Protaper通用再治疗系统在根管再治疗过程中去除弯曲根管内牙胶的疗效。
J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017 Apr 3;51(2):7-13. doi: 10.17096/jiufd.97431. eCollection 2017.
10
Efficacy of ProTaper and Mtwo Retreatment Files in Removal of Gutta-percha and GuttaFlow from Root Canals.ProTaper和Mtwo再治疗锉在去除根管内牙胶和GuttaFlow方面的疗效
Iran Endod J. 2016 Summer;11(3):184-7. doi: 10.7508/iej.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the antibacterial and cytotoxic properties of TotalFill and NeoSEALER flo bioceramic sealers.TotalFill和NeoSEALER流动型生物陶瓷封闭剂的抗菌和细胞毒性特性评估
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 May;27(5):491-497. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_103_24. Epub 2024 May 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of CBCT images in the volumetric assessment of residual root canal filling material: Effect of voxel size.锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像在根管充填材料残留量体积评估中的准确性:体素大小的影响
Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Aug;22(8):1091-1098. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_678_18.
2
Efficacy and retrievability of root canal filling using calcium silicate-based and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers with matched obturation techniques.采用匹配的充填技术,使用硅酸钙基和环氧树脂基根管封闭剂进行根管充填的疗效及可取出性
Aust Endod J. 2019 Dec;45(3):337-345. doi: 10.1111/aej.12323. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
3
Evaluation of the efficacy of filling material removal and re-filling after different retreatment procedures.
不同再治疗程序后充填材料去除及重新充填的疗效评估。
Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e94. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0094. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
4
Evaluation of Effectiveness of Two Different Endodontic Retreatment Systems in Removal of Gutta-percha: An in vitro Study.两种不同根管再治疗系统去除牙胶效果的评估:一项体外研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jun 1;19(6):726-731.
5
Postoperative pain after removal of gutta-percha from root canals in endodontic retreatment using rotary or reciprocating instruments: a prospective clinical study.采用旋转或往复器械进行根管再治疗时,从根管中取出牙胶后的术后疼痛:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Sep;22(7):2623-2631. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2361-x. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
6
Comparative evaluation of three different rotary instrumentation systems for removal of gutta-percha from root canal during endodontic retreatment: An study.三种不同旋转器械系统用于根管再治疗期间从根管中去除牙胶的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2017 Sep-Oct;20(5):311-316. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_132_17.
7
Retreatability of three calcium silicate-containing sealers and one epoxy resin-based root canal sealer with four different root canal instruments.四种不同根管器械对 3 种含硅酸钙类根管封闭剂和 1 种环氧树脂类根管封闭剂的可取出性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Mar;22(2):811-817. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2156-5. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
8
Cleanliness of Canal Walls following Gutta-Percha Removal with Hand Files, RaCe and RaCe plus XP-Endo Finisher Instruments: A Photographic Analysis.使用手动锉、RaCe和RaCe plus XP-Endo Finisher器械去除牙胶后根管壁的清洁度:一项摄影分析。
Iran Endod J. 2017 Spring;12(2):242-247. doi: 10.22037/iej.2017.47.
9
Assessment of Root Canal Filling Removal Effectiveness Using Micro-computed Tomography: A Systematic Review.使用微型计算机断层扫描评估根管充填物去除效果:一项系统评价。
J Endod. 2017 Apr;43(4):520-526. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.12.008. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
10
Removal of Root Canal Fillings in Curved Canals Using Either Reciprocating Single- or Rotary Multi-instrument Systems and a Supplementary Step with the XP-Endo Finisher.使用往复式单器械系统或旋转多器械系统及XP-Endo Finisher补充步骤去除弯曲根管内的根管充填物
J Endod. 2016 Jul;42(7):1114-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 May 20.